| Literature DB >> 35804367 |
Meng Han1,2, Haoneng Wu3, Weiming Yang1, Juanjuan Chen4.
Abstract
AIMS: The purpose of this study is to elucidate the correlation between thyroid hormone, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), vitamin D and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT), and to seek the independent predictors affecting disease development.Entities:
Keywords: Glycosylated hemoglobin; Hashimoto’s thyroiditis; Parathyroid hormone; Risk factors; Thyroid-stimulating hormone; Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35804367 PMCID: PMC9264533 DOI: 10.1186/s12902-022-01092-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Endocr Disord ISSN: 1472-6823 Impact factor: 3.263
General data in the groups of type 2 diabetes with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, type 2 diabetes and healthy control
| Characteristics | T2DM with HT | T2DM | Healthy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 11 | 30 | 47 | 0.060 |
| Female | 33 | 64 | 65 | |
| Age, years | 57.00 ± 10.20 | 59.13 ± 10.57 | 59.13 ± 10.57 | 0.277 |
Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test
Comparison between T2DM with HT patients, T2DM patients and healthy people
| T2DM with HT | T2DM | Healthy | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25(OH)D (ng/mL) | 19.96 ± 7.82 | 21.68 ± 6.39 | 30.96 ± 5.55 |
| PTH (pg/mL) | 41.27 ± 15.16 | 55.71 ± 23.98b | 43.41 ± 14.02 |
| HbA1c (%) | 7.4 ± 1.66 | 9.30 ± 2.45b | 5.33 ± 0.46 |
| TSH (mIU/L) | 10.81 ± 18.98 | 2.05 ± 1.69 | 3.23 ± 3.66 |
| FT3 (pg/mL) | 3.21 ± 1.59b | 2.89 ± 0.45b | 3.07 ± 0.34 |
| FT4 (ng/dL) | 1.19 ± 0.39 | 1.28 ± 0.26 | 1.28 ± 0.21 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD; Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test
aTwo-sided P-value is statistical significant in T2DM with HT group compared with T2DM group, P < 0.05
bTwo-sided P-value is statistical significant when compared with healthy group respectively, P < 0.05
Logistic regression analysis of T2DM with HT prevalence by 25(OH)D, HbA1c and thyroid function factors
| Univariate | Multivariate | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposure | OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | ||
| 25(OH)D more than 20 ng/ml | 0.470 (0.227–0.973) | 0.042 | 0.285 (0.055–1.472) | 0.134 |
| PTH | 0.947 (0.919–0.975) | < 0.001 | 0.934 (0.878–0.994) | 0.076 |
| HbA1c | 0.630 (0.501–0.792) | < 0.001 | 0.575 (0.351–0.944) | 0.029 |
| TSH | 1.665 (1.313–2.110) | < 0.001 | 2.002 (1.270–3.155) | 0.007 |
| FT3 | 1.570 (0.787–3.134) | 0.201 | 21.102 (2.3131–192.548) | 0.201 |
| FT4 | 0.394 (0.99–1.564) | 0.185 | 0.201 (0.014–2.827) | 0.458 |
Sex and age were regarded as covariates in logistic regression model
Fig. 1The identification of TSH threshold values in ROC curve. ROC curve used to determine the TSH threshold values in T2DM patients with HT. The threshold value is 4 mIU/L in TSH concentration, sensitivity was 72.7%, specificity was 94.6%