Rickard L Sjöberg1,2. 1. Department of Clinical Science, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. Rickard.sjoberg@umu.se. 2. Department of Clinical Science, Neurosciences, Umeå University, S901 85, Umeå, Sweden. Rickard.sjoberg@umu.se.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Since the late 1930s, electric brain stimulation (EBS) in awake patients has been known to occasionally elicit patient descriptions of a form of memory flashbacks, known as experiential phenomena. One understanding of these sensations are as caused by an augmentation of the capacity for memory retrieval. However, an alternative hypothesis holds that memory flashbacks during EBS are "synthetic constructions" in the form of mental events, falsely interpreted as memories. METHODS: A critical narrative review is used to discuss the false memory hypothesis in relation to the current empirical literature and source attribution theory. RESULTS: EBS as well as situational demands in the form of interaction between patient and neurosurgeon may both lead to the creation of mental events and influence their interpretation in a way that may create false memories. The false memory hypothesis provides a potential explanation for several apparent inconsistencies in the current literature such as (a) the fragmented nature of experiential reports, (b) the ability of EBS to induce memory retrieval errors in controlled studies, (c) that Penfield's elicitations of experiential phenomena are so rarely replicated in the modern era, and (d) the limited utility of techniques that elicit experiential phenomena in the treatment of memory disorders. CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis that experiential phenomena may largely be "synthetic constructions" deserves serious consideration by neurosurgeons.
BACKGROUND: Since the late 1930s, electric brain stimulation (EBS) in awake patients has been known to occasionally elicit patient descriptions of a form of memory flashbacks, known as experiential phenomena. One understanding of these sensations are as caused by an augmentation of the capacity for memory retrieval. However, an alternative hypothesis holds that memory flashbacks during EBS are "synthetic constructions" in the form of mental events, falsely interpreted as memories. METHODS: A critical narrative review is used to discuss the false memory hypothesis in relation to the current empirical literature and source attribution theory. RESULTS: EBS as well as situational demands in the form of interaction between patient and neurosurgeon may both lead to the creation of mental events and influence their interpretation in a way that may create false memories. The false memory hypothesis provides a potential explanation for several apparent inconsistencies in the current literature such as (a) the fragmented nature of experiential reports, (b) the ability of EBS to induce memory retrieval errors in controlled studies, (c) that Penfield's elicitations of experiential phenomena are so rarely replicated in the modern era, and (d) the limited utility of techniques that elicit experiential phenomena in the treatment of memory disorders. CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis that experiential phenomena may largely be "synthetic constructions" deserves serious consideration by neurosurgeons.
Authors: Wissam Deeb; Bryan Salvato; Leonardo Almeida; Kelly D Foote; Robert Amaral; Jurgen Germann; Paul B Rosenberg; David F Tang-Wai; David A Wolk; Anna D Burke; Stephen Salloway; Marwan N Sabbagh; M Mallar Chakravarty; Gwenn S Smith; Constantine G Lyketsos; Andres M Lozano; Michael S Okun Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-08-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jürgen Germann; Gavin J B Elias; Alexandre Boutet; Keshav Narang; Clemens Neudorfer; Andreas Horn; Aaron Loh; Wissam Deeb; Bryan Salvato; Leonardo Almeida; Kelly D Foote; Paul B Rosenberg; David F Tang-Wai; David A Wolk; Anna D Burke; Stephen Salloway; Marwan N Sabbagh; M Mallar Chakravarty; Gwenn S Smith; Constantine G Lyketsos; Michael S Okun; Andres M Lozano Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 21.566