Cigdem Alev Ozel1, Fatma Unal2, Ece Avuloglu-Yilmaz3, Esra Erikel2, Semra Mirici4, Deniz Yuzbasioglu2. 1. Faculty of Gazi Education, Department of Biology Education, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey. cigdemozel@gazi.edu.tr. 2. Science Faculty, Department of Biology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey. 3. Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Amasya University, Amasya, Turkey. 4. Faculty of Gazi Education, Department of Biology Education, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many genotoxicity tests allow us to understand the mechanism of damages on genetic material occurring in living organisms against various physical and chemical agents. One of them is the Comet test. The current study aimed to evaluate genotoxic caused by picloram and dicamba to root meristems of Allium cepa utilizing comet assay. METHODS: Two different protocols were used for rooting and auxin/pesticide application. (i) A. cepa bulbs were rooted in MS medium and then treated with Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium (control) and 0.67, 1.34, 2.01, 2.68, 3.35, 4.02, and 8.04 mg/L of picloram and dicamba using aseptic tissue culture techniques. (ii) A. cepa bulbs were then rooted in bidistilled water and treated with 0 (control), 0.67, 1.34, 2.01, 2.68, 3.35, 4.02, and 8.04 mg/L of picloram and dicamba in distilled water. The A. cepa root tip cells in both treatment groups were examined using comet test to find the possible DNA damaging effects of picloram and dicamba. RESULTS: The results obtained at all the concentrations were statistically compared with their control groups. Almost at all the concentrations of Picloram and dicamba increased comet tail intensity (%) and tail moment in roots treated in MS medium. Two highest concentrations revealed toxic effect. On the other hand, DNA damaging effect of both auxins was only noted on the highest (> 4.02 mg/L) in roots treated in distilled water. CONCLUSIONS: This study approve and confirm genotoxic effects of how growth regulators on plants. These findings give an evidence of DNA damage in A. cepa. Therefore, both picloram and dicamba should only be used in appropriate and recommended concentrations in agriculture to conserve ecosystem and to pose minimum threat to life.
BACKGROUND: Many genotoxicity tests allow us to understand the mechanism of damages on genetic material occurring in living organisms against various physical and chemical agents. One of them is the Comet test. The current study aimed to evaluate genotoxic caused by picloram and dicamba to root meristems of Allium cepa utilizing comet assay. METHODS: Two different protocols were used for rooting and auxin/pesticide application. (i) A. cepa bulbs were rooted in MS medium and then treated with Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium (control) and 0.67, 1.34, 2.01, 2.68, 3.35, 4.02, and 8.04 mg/L of picloram and dicamba using aseptic tissue culture techniques. (ii) A. cepa bulbs were then rooted in bidistilled water and treated with 0 (control), 0.67, 1.34, 2.01, 2.68, 3.35, 4.02, and 8.04 mg/L of picloram and dicamba in distilled water. The A. cepa root tip cells in both treatment groups were examined using comet test to find the possible DNA damaging effects of picloram and dicamba. RESULTS: The results obtained at all the concentrations were statistically compared with their control groups. Almost at all the concentrations of Picloram and dicamba increased comet tail intensity (%) and tail moment in roots treated in MS medium. Two highest concentrations revealed toxic effect. On the other hand, DNA damaging effect of both auxins was only noted on the highest (> 4.02 mg/L) in roots treated in distilled water. CONCLUSIONS: This study approve and confirm genotoxic effects of how growth regulators on plants. These findings give an evidence of DNA damage in A. cepa. Therefore, both picloram and dicamba should only be used in appropriate and recommended concentrations in agriculture to conserve ecosystem and to pose minimum threat to life.
Authors: Catherine C Lerro; Jonathan N Hofmann; Gabriella Andreotti; Stella Koutros; Christine G Parks; Aaron Blair; Paul S Albert; Jay H Lubin; Dale P Sandler; Laura E Beane Freeman Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Justin G P Miller; Ankur Jamwal; Yaroslav Ilnytskyy; Alice Hontela; Steve B Wiseman Journal: Comp Biochem Physiol Part D Genomics Proteomics Date: 2020-09-14 Impact factor: 2.674
Authors: J F Fairchild; K P Feltz; L C Sappington; A L Allert; K J Nelson; J Valle Journal: Arch Environ Contam Toxicol Date: 2008-09-11 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Ahmed A Ismail; Kai Wang; James R Olson; Matthew R Bonner; Olfat Hendy; Gaafar Abdel Rasoul; Diane S Rohlman Journal: J Toxicol Environ Health A Date: 2017-09-07
Authors: Claudine Samanic; Jennifer Rusiecki; Mustafa Dosemeci; Lifang Hou; Jane A Hoppin; Dale P Sandler; Jay Lubin; Aaron Blair; Michael C R Alavanja Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 9.031