Literature DB >> 35804201

Differences in HADS and SF-36 scores 1 year after critical illness in COVID-19 patients.

Roberta Teixeira Tallarico1, Benjamin Deniau2,3,4, Nicholas Fong1,5, Jade Ghosn6,7, Matthieu Legrand8,9.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35804201      PMCID: PMC9267703          DOI: 10.1007/s00134-022-06797-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   41.787


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Long-term outcomes among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) survivors have been a cause for concern [1-3]. Similarly, patients surviving critical illness from other conditions have shown anxiety, depression and altered quality of life, contributing to post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). The specific contribution of COVID-19 beyond the non-specific contribution of critical illness, however, remains unknown. In this study, we matched and compared critically ill survivors admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for COVID-19 to critically ill patients admitted for pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome unrelated to COVID-19. We explored hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) scores 1 year after hospitalization. We used two cohorts of critically ill patients: the French-COVID cohort (COVID-19 cohort, clinical trial NCT04262921) [4] and the FROG-ICU cohort (control cohort, clinical trial NCT01367093) [5]. We selected patients who survived 12 months post-hospitalization and subsequently had HADS and SF-36 scores assessed. 40 patients from each cohort were matched based on age, sex, comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension, chronic heart failure, previous stroke, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, liver disease, smoking, asthma, and cancer), and treatments (renal replacement therapy, mechanical ventilation, and use of vasopressors/inotropes; Supplemental Table 1). At 1 year, the COVID-19 vs control group median scores for HADS depression were 3 [1, 6] vs 2 [0, 6] (p = 0.807); for HADS anxiety were 4.5 [2, 9] vs 2 [0, 6] (p = 0.213); for the SF-36 physical component were 62.5 [40.8, 75.8] vs 55.2 [37.3, 73.3] (p = 0.264) and for the SF-36 mental component were 70.1 [44.5, 87.1] vs 58.9 [44.4, 72.8] (p = 0.08) (Fig. 1). SF-36 domains significantly higher in the COVID-19 vs controls were the emotional well-being (80 [65, 88] vs 64 [52, 72], p = 0.004) and the social functioning (75 [62.5, 100] vs 62.5 [50, 87.5], p = 0.047). Other domains were not significantly different between groups.
Fig. 1

Domains of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)and Short Form 36 in 12 months (SF-36a), in the matched cohorts. The SF-36 Physical Components includes the physical function domain, bodily pain domain, general health domain, physical function domain. The SF-36 mental components includes the mental health domain, energy and fatigue domain, emotional wellbeing, and social function

Domains of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)and Short Form 36 in 12 months (SF-36a), in the matched cohorts. The SF-36 Physical Components includes the physical function domain, bodily pain domain, general health domain, physical function domain. The SF-36 mental components includes the mental health domain, energy and fatigue domain, emotional wellbeing, and social function This study has limits. The control cohort enrolled between 2011 and 2013, so changes in clinical practice over time may have occurred. It was carried out primarily in France and had a limited sample-size with substantial loss to follow up. In addition, the outcomes measured in this study are not exhaustive and other functional outcomes were not collected. Finally, patients were recruited primarily in the pre-vaccination pandemic phase and were infected with the alpha variant, so results may not be generalizable to other scenarios. Long-term outcomes of patients with COVID-19 and critically ill patients have been concerning [1-3], however the interaction between COVID-19 and critical illness 1 year post-COVID-19 diagnosis has not yet been explored. In this case–control study, we identified no statistically significant difference in HADS and the physical and mental components of the SF-36 scores between groups. Of note, depression and anxiety scores were low and within normal range, although emotional well-being and social functioning domains were higher in COVID-19 survivors, suggesting better outcomes. This study provides reassuring preliminary data on the specific impact of COVID-19 on outcomes after critical illness. Future work should confirm these findings in larger cohorts and identify potential risk factors and drivers of poor long-term functional outcomes after critical illness to better understand strategies that could mitigate these outcomes. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary file1 (PDF 177 KB)
  3 in total

1.  Long Covid in adults discharged from UK hospitals after Covid-19: A prospective, multicentre cohort study using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol.

Authors:  Louise Sigfrid; Thomas M Drake; Ellen Pauley; Edwin C Jesudason; Piero Olliaro; Wei Shen Lim; Annelies Gillesen; Colin Berry; David J Lowe; Joanne McPeake; Nazir Lone; Daniel Munblit; Muge Cevik; Anna Casey; Peter Bannister; Clark D Russell; Lynsey Goodwin; Antonia Ho; Lance Turtle; Margaret E O'Hara; Claire Hastie; Chloe Donohue; Rebecca G Spencer; Cara Donegan; Alison Gummery; Janet Harrison; Hayley E Hardwick; Claire E Hastie; Gail Carson; Laura Merson; J Kenneth Baillie; Peter Openshaw; Ewen M Harrison; Annemarie B Docherty; Malcolm G Semple; Janet T Scott
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2021-08-06

2.  Long-term outcomes following severe COVID-19 infection: a propensity matched cohort study.

Authors:  Joanne McPeake; Martin Shaw; Pamela MacTavish; Kevin G Blyth; Helen Devine; Gillian Fleming; Justine Griffin; Lisa Gemmell; Pauline Grose; Mark Henderson; Philip Henderson; Lucy Hogg; Kirstin King; Iain McInnes; Peter O'Brien; Kathryn Puxty; Callum Rainey; Varun Sharma; Malcolm Sim; Laura Strachan; Stefan Siebert; Tara Quasim
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2021-12

3.  Determinants of long-term outcome in ICU survivors: results from the FROG-ICU study.

Authors:  Etienne Gayat; Alain Cariou; Nicolas Deye; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Samir Jaber; Charles Damoisel; Qin Lu; Xavier Monnet; Isabelle Rennuit; Elie Azoulay; Marc Léone; Heikel Oueslati; Bertrand Guidet; Diane Friedman; Antoine Tesnière; Romain Sonneville; Philippe Montravers; Sébastien Pili-Floury; Jean-Yves Lefrant; Jacques Duranteau; Pierre-François Laterre; Nicolas Brechot; Karine Chevreul; Morgane Michel; Bernard Cholley; Matthieu Legrand; Jean-Marie Launay; Eric Vicaut; Mervyn Singer; Matthieu Resche-Rigon; Alexandre Mebazaa
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 9.097

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.