| Literature DB >> 35804032 |
Amir Atapour1, Parisa Vosough2, Somayeh Jafari3, Gholamreza Anani Sarab4.
Abstract
Malaria is a complex disease caused by parasites of the genus Plasmodium and is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The most severe form of malaria disease is caused by Plasmodium falciparum. Thus, a combination of different approaches is needed to control malaria. Resistance to first-line drugs and insecticides, on the other hand, makes the need for an effective vaccination more urgent than ever. Because erythrocyte parasites cause the most clinical symptoms, developing a vaccination for this stage of infection might be highly beneficial. In this research, we employed various bioinformatics methods to create an efficient multi-epitope vaccine that induces antibodies against the blood stage of malaria infection. For this purpose, we selected the malaria PfGARP protein as the target here. The B, HTL epitopes, and epitope conservation were predicted. The predicted epitopes (including 5 B and 5 HTL epitopes) were connected using suitable linkers, and the flagellin molecule was used as an adjuvant to improve its immunogenicity. The final construct vaccine with 414 amino acids long was designed. The vaccine's allergenicity, antigenicity, solubility, physicochemical characteristics, 2D and 3D structure modeling, molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation, in silico cloning, and immunological simulation were tested. In silico immune simulation results showed significantly elevated IgG1 and IgM and T helper cells, INF γ, IL 2, and B-cell populations after the injection of the designed vaccine. These significant computational analyses indicated that our proposed vaccine candidate might activate suitable immune responses against malaria. However, in vitro and in vivo studies are essential for further validation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35804032 PMCID: PMC9266094 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-15956-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
List of the five B-cell epitopes from PfGARP protein by ABCpred Server.
| Rank | Sequence | Start position | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HGEENLYEEMVSEINN | 162 | 0.93 |
| 2 | HETSNDTKDNDKENIS | 204 | 0.91 |
| 3 | AEEDDDDAEEDDDDAE | 596 | 0.89 |
| 4 | CEEQHITVESRPLSQP | 441 | 0.89 |
| 5 | GCGIISSVHETSNDTK | 186 | 0.89 |
List of the top predicted MHC class II peptide from (PfGARP) protein, by IEDB MHC-II server.
| Allele | HTL epitopes | Method | Percentile | Smm_ic50 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
2-16 HLA-DRB1*01:03 | FSNGLLKNQNILNKS | NetMHCIIpan | 20.00 | N/A |
234-248 HLA-DRB1*01:05 | TLDKKERKQKEKEMK | NetMHCIIpan | 100.00 | N/A |
91-105 HLA-DRB1*01:03 | SVDKKKDKKEKKHKK | Consensus (comb.lib./smm/nn | 100.00 | N/A |
401-415 HLA-DRB1*01:03 | DKGKHKKAKKEKVKK | NetMHCIIpan | 82.00 | N/A |
12-26 HLA-DPA1*01/DPB1*04:01 | ILNKSFDSITGRLLN | Consensus (comb.lib./smm) | 11.35 | 1257.00 |
Epitope conservancy degrees were analyzed using the tool (http://tools.iedb.org/conservancy).
| Epitope | Epitope name | Epitope sequence | Epitope length | Percent of protein sequence matches at identity < = 100% | Minimum identity (%) | Maximum identity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Epitope 1 | HGEENLYEEMVSEINN | 16 | 55.00% (11/20) | 31.25 | 100.00 |
| 2 | Epitope 2 | HETSNDTKDNDKENIS | 16 | 55.00% (11/20) | 31.25 | 100.00 |
| 3 | Epitope 3 | AEEDDDDAEEDDDDAE | 16 | 30.00% (6/20) | 25.00 | 100.00 |
| 4 | Epitope 4 | CEEQHITVESRPLSQP | 16 | 55.00% (11/20) | 18.75 | 100.00 |
| 5 | Epitope 5 | GCGIISSVHETSNDTK | 16 | 45.00% (9/20) | 25.00 | 100.00 |
| 6 | Epitope 6 | FSNGLLKNQNILNKS | 15 | 75.00% (15/20) | 26.67 | 100.00 |
| 7 | Epitope 7 | TLDKKERKQKEKEMK | 15 | 70.00% (14/20) | 40.00 | 100.00 |
| 8 | Epitope 8 | SVDKKKDKKEKKHKK | 15 | 45.00% (9/20) | 46.67 | 100.00 |
| 9 | Epitope 9 | DKGKHKKAKKEKVKK | 15 | 45.00% (9/20) | 53.33 | 100.00 |
| 10 | Epitope10 | ILNKSFDSITGRLLN | 15 | 55.00% (11/20) | 20.00 | 100.00 |
Epitopes are present in all homologous sequences with a conservancy degree from 20 to 100 percent. Epitope 7 is the most abundant.
Figure 1The schematic map of the final vaccine construct. In this construct, the adjuvant sequence was placed at the N-terminal and joined a multi-epitope sequence with the EAAAK linker (Black). GPGPG (Red) and AYY linkers (Blue) were used to bond B and HTL epitopes. The 414-amino acid long multi-epitope sequence was constructed. 6x-His-tag was placed at the C-terminal of the multi-epitope sequence to identify and purification aims.
Figure 2The PSIPRED server predicted a graphical demonstration of secondary structure properties of the final designed vaccine. Our vaccine's protein sequence comprised 60% alpha-helices, 39% beta strands, and 0.4% coils.
Figure 3The 3D model of the final designed vaccine was obtained after homology modeling on Phyre2.
Figure 4The validation of the final 3D model. (A) PROCHECK's Ramachandran plot illustrates that the residues are placed in the allowed (96%) and favored (4%) regions. (B) ProSA Z-score plot shows a -2.84 score in the range of conformation of the native protein. (C) ERRAT plot showed the overall quality factor to be 98.06%.
Predicted conformational epitopes of the final designed vaccine by the ElliPro server.
| No | Residues | Number of residues | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | E143, :A144, :K145, :E146, :K147, :D148, :E149, :D150, :T151, :D152, :E153 | 11 | 0.934 |
| 2 | :S8, :L9, :L10, :T11, :Q12, :N13, :N14, :L15, :N16, :K17, :S18, :Q19, :S20, :A21, :L22, :G23, :T24, :A25, :I26, :E27, :R28, :L29, :S30, :S31, :G32,:R34, :I35, :A38, :D41, :E257,:E258, :D260, :D261, :D262, :A263, :E264, :G265, :P266, :G267, :P268, :G269, :C270, :E271, :E272, :Q273, :H274, :I275, :T276, :V277, :E278, :S279 | 51 | 0.773 |
| 3 | :E119, :R122, :G125, :Q126, :K133, :V134, :L135, :A136, :Q137, :D138, :N139, :T140, :E141, :E142, :E154, :A155, :A156, :V157, :E158, :E159, :E160, :D161, :E162, :E163, :K164, :K165, :P166, :K167, :T168, :K169, :V171, :E172, :V175, :W176 | 34 | 0.749 |
Figure 53D demonstration of the predicted conformational or discontinuous B-cell epitopes in the final designed vaccine construct. A yellow surface indicates the conformational or discontinuous B cell epitopes, and the rest of the residues is illustrated in grey sticks.
Figure 6The docked model between the TLR5 receptor and the final designed vaccine using the ClusPro server. The vaccine protein is blue, and the rest of the residues are the TLR5 receptor. The lowest energy score of this docked model is − 1353.6, showing good binding affinity.
The interaction site between two proteins (TLR5 and designed vaccine) is defined as the hotspot residues in the protein complex.
| Residue number | Residue name | Chain |
|---|---|---|
| 569 | VAL | A (TLR5) |
| 598 | ASN | A |
| 596 | HIS | A |
| 180 | LEU | B (designed vaccine) |
| 640 | PHE | A |
| 178 | TRP | B |
| 177 | ASP | B |
| 655 | MET | A |
| 188 | TRP | B |
The hotspot residues are represented.
Figure 7The interaction site of the designed vaccine and toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5) was analyzed by the PPCheck tool. The TLR5 is represented as cyan ribbons (chain A), the designed vaccine is illustrated as green color (chain B), and the interacting residues are in magenta. The residues are labeled, indicating the actual residue number of the structures and the relative chains.
Figure 8The molecular dynamics simulation of the vaccine-TLR5 docked complex. (A) The Root Mean Square Fluctuation (RMSF) plot of the protein vaccine structure demonstrates the fluctuations of MEV residues during the fast simulations. High degree fluctuation was identified in the residues at positions 219 and 617 in 4.58 Å and 3.57 Å. (B). The identified stable protein vaccine structure with fast flexibility simulations using the CABS-Flex server.
Figure 9In silico cloning of multi-epitopes vaccine sequence into pET28a (+) expression vector using SnapGene software free-trial (https://www.snapgene.com/free-trial/), the red and gray semicircles represent the multi-epitopes vaccine sequence and the pET28a (+) backbone, respectively.
Figure 10In silico immune simulation results of the designed vaccine from C-ImmSim server. (A) The titer of immunoglobulins was produced after the injection of the designed vaccine. (B) High titers of IFN-g and IL-2 were induced after vaccine administration. (C) B-cell populations prediction with a significant increase in the memory, non-memory cells, and IgM isotype. (D) The T-helper cell population per state (cells per mm3) levels increased after the injection.