Literature DB >> 35802837

Supporting Structured Data Capture for Patients With Cancer: An Initiative of the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center Survivorship Program to Improve Capture of Malignant Diagnosis and Cancer Staging Data.

Hamid Emamekhoo1,2, Cibele B Carroll2, Chelsea Stietz3, Jeffrey B Pier3, Michael D Lavitschke3, Daniel Mulkerin4, Mary E Sesto1,2, Amye J Tevaarwerk5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Structured data elements within electronic health records are health-related information that can be entered, stored, and extracted in an organized manner at later time points. Tracking outcomes for cancer survivors is also enabled by structured data. We sought to increase structured data capture within oncology practices at multiple sites sharing the same electronic health records.
METHODS: Applying engineering approaches and the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle, we launched dual quality improvement initiatives to ensure that a malignant diagnosis and stage were captured as structured data. Intervention: Close Visit Validation (CVV) requires providers to satisfy certain criteria before closing ambulatory encounters. CVV may be used to track open clinical encounters and chart delinquencies to encourage optimal clinical workflows. We added two cancer-specific required criteria at the time of closing encounters in oncology clinics: (1) the presence of at least one malignant diagnosis on the Problem List and (2) staging all the malignant diagnoses on the Problem List when appropriate.
RESULTS: Six months before the CVV implementation, the percentage of encounters with a malignant diagnosis on the Problem List at the time of the encounter was 65%, whereas the percentage of encounters with a staged diagnosis was 32%. Three months after cancer-specific CVV implementation, the percentages were 85% and 75%, respectively. Rates had increased to 90% and 88% more than 2 years after implementation.
CONCLUSION: Oncologist performance improved after the implementation of cancer-specific CVV criteria, with persistently high percentages of relevant malignant diagnoses and cancer stage structured data capture 2 years after the intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35802837      PMCID: PMC9296185          DOI: 10.1200/CCI.22.00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform        ISSN: 2473-4276


  26 in total

1.  Practicing Clinicians' Recommendations to Reduce Burden from the Electronic Health Record Inbox: a Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Daniel R Murphy; Tyler Satterly; Traber D Giardina; Dean F Sittig; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Survivor and Clinician Assessment of Survivorship Care Plans for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients: An Engineering, Primary Care, and Oncology Collaborative for Survivorship Health.

Authors:  Colleen M Morken; Amye J Tevaarwerk; Amanda K Swiecichowski; James E Haine; Zachary T Williams; Kirsten Norslien; Natalia Arroyo; Xiao Zhang; Bethaney Campbell; Eneida A Mendonca; Mark B Juckett; Mary E Sesto
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Implementing an Electronic Data Capture System to Improve Clinical Workflow in a Large Academic Radiation Oncology Practice.

Authors:  Dario Pasalic; Jay P Reddy; Timothy Edwards; Hubert Y Pan; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2018-12

4.  A Hospital-Wide Intervention to Improve Compliance With TNM Cancer Staging Documentation.

Authors:  Jason H Lee; Tariq Mohamed; Celia Ramsey; Jihoon Kim; Shelly Kane; Kathryn A Gold; Farhoud Faraji; Joseph A Califano
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 11.908

5.  Chasm Between Cancer Quality Measures and Electronic Health Record Data Quality.

Authors:  Anna E Schorer; Richard Moldwin; Jacob Koskimaki; Elmer V Bernstam; Neeta K Venepalli; Robert S Miller; James L Chen
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2022-01

Review 6.  Moving beyond static survivorship care plans: A systems engineering approach to population health management for cancer survivors.

Authors:  Amye J Tevaarwerk; Jennifer R Klemp; Gijsberta J van Londen; Bradford W Hesse; Mary E Sesto
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Electronic Intervention to Improve Structured Cancer Stage Data Capture.

Authors:  Michael Cecchini; Kim Framski; Patricia Lazette; Teresita Vega; Michael Strait; Kerin Adelson
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Time Spent on Dedicated Patient Care and Documentation Tasks Before and After the Introduction of a Structured and Standardized Electronic Health Record.

Authors:  Erik Joukes; Ameen Abu-Hanna; Ronald Cornet; Nicolette F de Keizer
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.342

9.  Structured Data Capture for Oncology.

Authors:  Alexander K Goel; Walter Scott Campbell; Richard Moldwin
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2021-02

10.  SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.

Authors:  Greg Ogrinc; Louise Davies; Daisy Goodman; Paul Batalden; Frank Davidoff; David Stevens
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.852

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.