Arshad Altaf1, Muhammad Safdar Kamal Pasha2, Ayesha Majeed3, Wajid Ali4, Ahmed Sabry Alaama5, Muhammad Shahid Jamil1. 1. Global HIV, Hepatitis and STIs Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. 2. World Health Organization Country Office, Islamabad, Pakistan. 3. National AIDS Control Programme, Islamabad, Pakistan. 4. Pireh Male Health Society, Larkana, Pakistan. 5. World Health Organization Regional Office for Eastern Mediterranean, Cairo, Egypt.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: HIV self-testing (HIVST) is an innovative HIV testing approach that effectively reaches those who do not otherwise test, including key populations (KPs). Despite potential benefits, HIVST is not currently implemented in Pakistan. The high risk of HIV among transgender (TGs) persons is among the highest risk group for HIV in Pakistan, yet knowledge of HIV status remains low in this key population group. We conducted a pilot project to assess the acceptability and feasibility of distributing HIVST to TGs in Larkana. METHODS: Eligible participants were 18 years or above and self-identified as transgender ("hijra"). One oral fluid HIVST kit per person was distributed free of cost in the community by trained transgender peer outreach workers (ORW). Participants could request a demonstration of the HIVST procedure before performing self-testing which was provided by the trained ORW. Demographic characteristics of participants were collected. The ORW followed up with phone calls two days later to record if HIVST kits were used, the results, and whether assistance was required. RESULTS: Between November 2020 and February 2021, 150 HIVST kits were distributed to eligible TGs. The average age of participants was 25.5 years (standard deviation: 7.0). Over a third (52, 34.7%) had no formal education, while (16, 10.6%) had attended at least five years of schooling. Over one-third (58, 38.6%) of participants were first-time testers. One hundred and thirty-nine (92.7%) participants reported their results within two days. For the remaining 11 participants, ORWs had to contact them. All participants reported using HIVST kits within three days. A majority (141, 94%) used the kit in their homes, and the remaining nine (6%) used it at the community-based organization's office. Overall, a small proportion (11, 7.3%) of participants requested a demonstration of the test procedure before performing HIVST. Four (2.7%) participants who had performed unsupervised self-tests reported reactive HIVST results; all were linked to treatment within five working days once their HIV result was confirmed. The majority (136, 90.6%) of participants felt that self-testing was easy to perform independently, and 143 (95%) reported that they would recommend HIVST to their peers. CONCLUSION: HIVST is acceptable among TGs and identified by first-time testers as undiagnosed infections. Peer-led distribution appears to be a feasible approach for implementation in this setting. HIVST should be considered for routine implementation and scale up to reduce testing gaps among Pakistan's key population, particularly TGs.
BACKGROUND: HIV self-testing (HIVST) is an innovative HIV testing approach that effectively reaches those who do not otherwise test, including key populations (KPs). Despite potential benefits, HIVST is not currently implemented in Pakistan. The high risk of HIV among transgender (TGs) persons is among the highest risk group for HIV in Pakistan, yet knowledge of HIV status remains low in this key population group. We conducted a pilot project to assess the acceptability and feasibility of distributing HIVST to TGs in Larkana. METHODS: Eligible participants were 18 years or above and self-identified as transgender ("hijra"). One oral fluid HIVST kit per person was distributed free of cost in the community by trained transgender peer outreach workers (ORW). Participants could request a demonstration of the HIVST procedure before performing self-testing which was provided by the trained ORW. Demographic characteristics of participants were collected. The ORW followed up with phone calls two days later to record if HIVST kits were used, the results, and whether assistance was required. RESULTS: Between November 2020 and February 2021, 150 HIVST kits were distributed to eligible TGs. The average age of participants was 25.5 years (standard deviation: 7.0). Over a third (52, 34.7%) had no formal education, while (16, 10.6%) had attended at least five years of schooling. Over one-third (58, 38.6%) of participants were first-time testers. One hundred and thirty-nine (92.7%) participants reported their results within two days. For the remaining 11 participants, ORWs had to contact them. All participants reported using HIVST kits within three days. A majority (141, 94%) used the kit in their homes, and the remaining nine (6%) used it at the community-based organization's office. Overall, a small proportion (11, 7.3%) of participants requested a demonstration of the test procedure before performing HIVST. Four (2.7%) participants who had performed unsupervised self-tests reported reactive HIVST results; all were linked to treatment within five working days once their HIV result was confirmed. The majority (136, 90.6%) of participants felt that self-testing was easy to perform independently, and 143 (95%) reported that they would recommend HIVST to their peers. CONCLUSION: HIVST is acceptable among TGs and identified by first-time testers as undiagnosed infections. Peer-led distribution appears to be a feasible approach for implementation in this setting. HIVST should be considered for routine implementation and scale up to reduce testing gaps among Pakistan's key population, particularly TGs.
There has been an 84% increase in new HIV infections in Pakistan between 2010 and 2020 [1]. Despite the increase, less than a quarter (22%) of all people living with HIV (PLHIV) were aware of their HIV status in 2020, and only 12% of PLHIV were on antiretroviral treatment (ART) [1]. Transgender people (TGs), known locally as “hijra,” “zenana,” or “khusra,” are a key population group as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) [2] and are among the highest risk groups for HIV in Pakistan. According to UNAIDS estimates, [3] HIV prevalence among TGs in 2020 was estimated to be 5.5%. Awareness of and access to HIV services, including HIV testing, remain low among TG. According to national behavioral surveillance, in 2016–2017, only a third (34%) of all TGs reported having ever tested for HIV, and less than half (43%) know where to get tested for HIV [4]. In addition to structural barriers, stigma, and discrimination toward key populations in the society and health settings, criminalization of their behaviors contributes to low uptake of services [3, 5].Currently, community-based HIV testing services and mobile outreach by non-governmental and community-based organizations are the primary HIV testing approach used for key populations in Pakistan, including TGs. Typically, outreach workers offer rapid testing to key populations in the community through mobile outreach in hotspots. Those with reactive rapid test results are referred to HIV testing sites or ART centers for further testing and linkage. National programmes focusing specifically on TGs are non-existent and limited to small projects funded mainly by the Global Fund (GF).HIV self-testing (HIVST) is a process in which a person collects their specimen (oral fluid or blood) using a simple, rapid HIV test and then performs the test and interprets their result at the place and time of their convenience [6]. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended HIVST as an HIV testing approach first in 2016 and an updated recommendation in 2019 [6]. Most lay users can perform HIVST accurately without the need for additional support [7]. However, where needed, a range of support options are available such as video-based demonstrations, in-person observation or supervision, or real-time virtual support through digital platforms [6]. HIVST is an effective approach for reaching undiagnosed people and first-time testers among the general and key population elsewhere [8, 9]. However, TGs are underrepresented in HIVST research globally, with limited lessons on optimal ways to implement this intervention among TGs. Globally, 94 countries had supportive HIVST policies in 2020, and half of them (48) are now routinely implementing HIVST. In the WHO’s Eastern Mediterranean Region, only four countries have reported adopting HIVST policies as of 2020, namely Iran, Lebanon, Morocco, and Pakistan. Three of these are piloting HIVST on a small scale to inform broader implementation, and only one country (Lebanon) is routinely implementing it [10]. During the COVID-19 epidemic, HIVST has emerged as an important approach to maintaining HIV testing services [11].Although HIVST has been included in the national policy in Pakistan since 2018, to date, neither implementation has taken place, nor have any products registered. HIVST response in Pakistan is primarily externally donor funded. In 2018, the national programme and other partners organized a national consultation on HIVST, which supported the introduction of HIVST and led to the developing of a roadmap in this direction. However, there has been no progress to date, given the lack of resources. The national programme and other partners are now working collectively to introduce HIVST in 2022.To support the process and selection of optimal models, we conducted a pilot project in Pakistan to assess the acceptability and feasibility of peer-led HIVST distribution among TGs. This is the first HIVST pilot in Pakistan, focusing on a priority population with limited access to services and no evidence of formative research conducted within this key population group.
Methods
Study design
This was a cross sectional descriptive study conducted among TGs residing in Larkana, Pakistan. This study was designed as a pilot in consultation with the National AIDS Control Programme (NACP), so the lessons could inform the future more comprehensive programmatic implementation of HIVST in this population. A convenience sample of 150 TGs was recruited using oral fluid HIVST kits. OraQuick HIV Self-Test (OraSure Technologies Inc., Pennsylvania, US) was used in this study. The kits were donated free of cost by the manufacturer for this study.
Study setting
Larkana is a rural district in Sindh province of Pakistan located on the right bank of River Indus and close to the ruins of the Indus Valley Civilization famously called, Mohen jo Daro [12]. The area’s economy is largely based on rice cultivation. The estimated population of Larkana is around 500,000 [13]. The town has a tertiary level public teaching hospital which also has an HIV testing and treatment center and there are two other secondary level government health centers, one for women and the other one for children. There are a number of secondary level private health centers. Many trained and untrained private practitioners also provide health care services to the locals of the town. ARTs and HIV testing is offered at the tertiary level public hospital in Larkana and second level health facility in Ratodero. In 2019, Larkana was the center of an HIV outbreak that primarily affected children. Children (ages 5 to 16 years) accounted for 86% of all HIV infections, with unsafe injection practices being a major source of transmission [14]. Given the rural nature of the town, education level is low and public transport is limited making health facilities less accessible for those living at a distance.The Integrated Behavioral and Biological Survey (IBBS) Round V in 2016–17 reported an HIV prevalence of 14% among TGs in Larkana [15].
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria were adults aged 18 years or above, self-identifying as TG and residing in Larkana. All enrolled participants reported that they were HIV negative or had not been tested in the past six months. Participants were excluded if they were HIV positive or on ART, unable to provide consent, unable to read instructions in the Urdu language, or reported prior HIVST use.
Study procedures
The study was implemented by a community-based organization (CBO) in Larkana called Pireh Male Health Society. This CBO has been implementing a Global Fund (GF) supported service delivery project among TGs in this town since 2016.The study procedures were implemented by peer outreach workers who routinely conduct field visits and outreach to offer HIV prevention services to TGs. The peer outreach workers visited hotspots such as a tea stall, main bus stand, market area or in the streets where TGs solicit sex. They also visited leaders of the TG community (”Guru”) in places where TGs reside or gather on a daily basis.For this study, eight peer outreach workers (ages between 25 and 55 years) with previous experience working in HIV and AIDS related research were provided two half day-long training sessions in Karachi. The training was led by AA and an HIV physician with experience in working with the key population (not an author). The training material was based on WHO Consolidated Guidelines on HIV Testing Services (2019), WHO HIVST strategic framework, and manufacturer instructions for use [2]. The training covered study procedures, including the distribution and use of HIVST kits, steps to take after receiving results, supporting participants in completing study procedures, ethical considerations, data collection, and follow up of participants. The first half of the training focused on providing background information in an interactive plenary session. In contrast, the second half was hands-on and included mock exercises on participant recruitment, describing the study, administering the consent, questionnaire, and data collection. In addition, all peer outreach workers received training in performing HIVST kits on themselves, interpreting of results, and steps to take according to the results.During their routine outreach activities, peer outreach workers informed potential participants about the study. Those who were interested were provided detailed information regarding available HIV prevention services and HIV testing including HIV self-testing and benefits of antiretroviral therapy (ART).The HIV prevention services routinely offered include:Free condom and lubricant distribution.HIV testing services using the rapid diagnostic kits in the CBO office.Information about the HIV testing offered at the HIV testing center in the main hospital.The CBO also provides information, education, and communication material on HIV and AIDS.If someone is HIV positive, the CBO staff facilitates clinical visits for confirmatory testing and ART initiation at the treatment center.As a part of their services, the ORWs of the CBO also offer to accompany the HIV positive TGs to the treatment center in the town.At the time of study, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) was not available in Larkana or elsewhere in Pakistan.Those who were eligible and agreed to participate were given a package that included:An HIVST kit;An illustrative leaflet in local language (Urdu) providing step-by-step instructions to perform the test, read and interpret the result and steps to take for negative, reactive and invalid HIVST results. The translation was provided by the manufacturer which was carefully reviewed by the study team and improved for flow and context;Every participant was sent a short instructional video in local language (Urdu) via WhatsApp;A 90 second video of the manufacturer (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlldduI79ic&t=17s) performing the HIVST and explaining the steps on how to perform the test, how to read the result, how to discard the kit and what to do in case of a reactive result;A leaflet with information about other HIV prevention services.The participants could either take HIVST kit with them for later use or conduct the test at the CBO office in a private room. An optional demonstration of HIVST use by an ORW prior to HIVST distribution at home and in the CBO office was offered to all participants. The demonstration included the outreach worker explaining the HIVST process to the study participant in person using the HIVST kit. The ORW then placed the sealed test kit on the table for the study participant to perform the test in private.Each participant was administered a two part questionnaire. The first part was completed at the time of enrolment and included quantitative questions related to demographics, risk behavior, and prior testing history. The second part which was completed after participants performed HIVST included three open ended questions related to HIVST acceptability (overall experience and ease of use; perceived ability to perform HIVST) and preferences for accessing HIVST in the future.
Defining acceptability and feasibility
The definition of acceptability in this study was how the TGs received HIVST, and feasibility was if a peer led approach is practically possible to implement.The open ended questions were:How was your experience of participating in this project?Do you think MSM and TGs can do HIVST on their own in Pakistan? What difficulties do you foresee and how can those be fixed?In your opinion, how should HIVST kits be distributed among key population in Pakistan.Those completing HIVST at home were asked these questions during follow up (see later).Participants were asked to contact ORW after using the test kit to report their results and completion of second part of questionnaire. For those who did not contact the ORW within two days after distribution, a follow up phone call was made. If the first phone call led to no answer, another call was made the same day. In case there was no response then no further follow up was done on that day. During the follow up call, participants were asked about their HIVST results and offered support to link to post-test services.When someone had a reactive result, these steps were taken:The study participant was counseled over the phone and invited to come to the CBO office for a posttest counseling sessionThe study participant was transported to the testing center by CBO vehicle or rikshaw (fair paid by CBO)All confirmed cases were enrolled in the ART treatment and support services
Data management and analysis
A trained data entry operator entered data from the paper-based questionnaires into an MS Excel spreadsheet. Quantitative variables (demographics, risk behaviors, testing history) were analyzed descriptively in Excel and reported as frequencies and percentages for categorical variables and as means and standard deviations for continuous variables (age). HIVST results and linkage outcomes were described as narrative text with frequencies and percentages.Responses to the open-ended questions were manually analyzed using content analysis: common responses were grouped, and key themes were identified. Content analysis was used because the research team was familiar with this technique.
Ethical considerations
Ethical clearance for the study was obtained from the Ethical Review Committee (ERC) of Bridge Consultants Foundation on 26th October 2020. Each participant was given a written information sheet and study procedures were explained to them. All participants provided a written informed consent. A onetime mobile credit of Pakistani rupees 300 (equivalent USD = 1.97 at the time of study) was provided to each study participant to compensate for their time completing study procedures.
Results
Between November 2020 and February 2021, 156 TGs were approached for participation. Of these 150 eligible participants were recruited. There were six refusals. The average age of participants was 25.5 years (standard deviation: 7.0).Out of 150, 52 (34.7%) had no formal education. Participants reported an average of 11 sexual partners in the last month and an average of 12 receptive anal sex acts in the last three months. Thirty-eight (23.5%) participants reported condom use at last sexual act (Table 1). Of all participants, 58 (38.6%) were first time testers and 67 (42.9%) had an HIV test less than three months ago (Table 2).
Table 1
Demographic details of TGs in Larkana.
Variable
Result (%) n = 150
Mean age
25.5 years
Age range
16–50 years
Ethnicity
Sindhi
144 (96%)
Urdu
1 (0.7%)
Saraiki
5 (3.3%
Education
No formal education
52 (34.7%)
12 years of schooling
17 (11.3%)
10 years of schooling
21 (14.0%)
5 years of schooling
16 (10.6%)
Others (two, three and four years of schooling)
44 (29.3%)
Table 2
Sexual behaviors, HIV perception and HIV testing and acceptability of HIVST.
Variable
Result (%)
Average number of sexual partners in the last month
11
Average number of anal sex receptive in the last three months when you were at the bottom
12
Condom use in last sexual act
38 (25.3%)
HIV risk perception
At risk
117 (78%)
Not at risk
14 (9.3%)
Not sure
19 (12.7%)
Last HIV test
Never tested
58 (38.6%)
Less than three months ago
67 (42.9%)
More than three months ago
25 (16.6%)
Place of last HIV test
At the ARV center
78 (52%)
At CBO office
7 (4.7%)
By ORW in the community
3 (2%)
At a private lab
9 (6%)
Did not respond
53 (35.3%)
Acceptability of HIVST
HIVST is easy to perform
136 (90.6%)
HIVST instructions easy to use
141 (94%)
Will recommend HIVST to peers
143 (95%)
All participants reported using their HIVST kit within three days, with 134 (89%) reported they used it within two days. Majority of the participants 141 (94%) performed HIVST at their homes while remaining 9 (6%) performed HIVST kit at the CBO office. Majority of participants 139, 92.6%) were able to perform HIVST with instructions for use and video provided, and 11 (7.3%) requested assistance during testing.Four participants (2.6%) reported reactive HIVST result. All four were accompanied to a testing center by a peer outreach worker and all were confirmed HIV positive. All four were linked to HIV treatment at the ART Center within five working days.In response to open ended follow up questions related to HIVST use and acceptability, 139 (92.6%) reported oral HIVST to be an acceptable HIV testing approach. Seventeen (11.3%) participants had expressed initial concerns and anxiety about the use of self-testing but found the overall HIVST process to be satisfactory. On further probing it was informed that their concern was related to their ability to use the self-test kit on their own. All respondents had later informed that they were able to use the HIVST kits without much difficulty.Majority of participants (94%) found instructions for use easy to understand. Many 137 (91.3%) preferred oral fluid based HIVST as being the preferred type of test. Most of the participants145 (96.6%) found peer outreach worker based model to be acceptable.We had also inquired from the ORWs and the head of CBO about the feasibility of implementing a peer led approach for HIVST among TGs and other key population groups and the unanimous response was that it is quite feasible to implement it.
Discussion
This is the first HIVST research in Pakistan where participants performed HIVST. This is also one of the few HIVST studies conducted among TGs. Peer-based HIVST distribution was found to be feasible and acceptable among TGs in a non-urban setting. The majority of participants could perform HIVST with instructions provided without the need for additional assistance. Many participants were first time testers, and four new HIV infections were diagnosed and linked to ART.The idea to adopt HIVST in Pakistan is not new. In 2018, a national stakeholder workshop was held under the leadership of national AIDS programme which supported the introduction of innovative interventions including HIVST and PrEP to address the growing epidemic and a roadmap was developed [16]. However, implementation lagged. Our findings can inform the future roll out of HIVST in the country. HIVST introduction needs to be prioritized in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. WHO EMR reviewed the impact of COVID-19 on HIV testing in the region and found that the number of HIV tests performed in 2020 were 3,552,819 compared to 8,844,382 in 2019 [17]. The COVID-19 pandemic played a key role in reducing the number of tests because of lockdown measures, conversion of testing infrastructure in the countries towards COVID-19 testing and also reallocation of resources. HIVST has emerged as one of key strategies to address HTS disruptions during COVID-19 and many programmes successfully scaled it to ensure service continuity [11]. Key stakeholder such as the National AIDS Control Programme needs to proactively pursue registration of HIVST kits with Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan (DRAP) which will pave the way for the availability of the product across the country.Our findings support peer-delivered HIVST kits as an acceptable and feasible approach for reaching TG population. Many TGs had expressed their preference for oral based HIVST. They were of the view that a finger prick causes pain, and they would not like to go through the pain even if for a few seconds.Peer outreach workers are an integral part of routine community based service delivery in Pakistan. Peer and community led approaches for HIVST have been successfully implemented among the key population in different parts of the world. Okoboi [18], Wirtz [19] and Adeagbo [20] have used this approach for HIVST distribution in Uganda, Myanmar and South Africa. In Pakistan, with additional training they can be capacitated to distribute HIVST kits in the community and support linkage. In our study a total of five trained outreach workers who received a nominal allowance, mobile phone credit and transportation (for clients) successfully reached out to 150 peers in a relatively short time period. For routine implementation they should be adequately renumerated, or it could be part of their core function to ensure sustainability.After the 2019 HIV outbreak, a mass testing campaign was initiated [21] where a number of factors related to HIV testing were overlooked [22] ranging from lack of pre and posttest counseling and ethical considerations related to privacy and confidentiality (also from personal communication with AAS, field manager of an NGO based community engagement project in Ratodero). The availability of HIVST in such a scenario would have helped in alleviating some of those concerns.Global evidence suggests that linkage to care among those diagnosed HIV-positive after HIVST is similar to standard HTS [8, 9]. In our study, with support from peer outreach workers, all those who had a reactive HIVST result received confirmatory testing and were linked to care. These findings are consistent with evidence from other settings showing peer navigation can improve linkage to care with HIVST compared to HIVST alone [8, 23]. Where feasible such approaches can be considered to improve linkage. Nevertheless, delayed initiation of ART and challenges related to access to treatment and care by PLHIV and key population have been documented in Pakistan [24-26]. It is only prudent to timely address these issues in order to increase the number of HIV positive persons receiving treatment and care. HIVST can also help in increasing the testing rates, particularly among the key population who are residing in rural settings such as Larkana and its adjoining areas.Our study has some limitations. First, we recruited a small convenience sample of TGs, second, the setting was a non-urban one. Thus findings may not be directly applicable to all settings or key populations. We are also mindful of the selection and response bias that a convenient sample can cause. We provided free HIVST kits and a small incentive to participants as well as to peer workers. The element of self-reporting bias also exists. We are not sure if results will be similar in real world setting in the absence of incentives or if key populations have to pay for HIVST kits. A key concern related to HIVST is social harm and the possibility of committing suicide after receiving a reactive result. Unfortunately, we were unable to assess for suicidal ideation in our study. To maximize the uptake and benefit of HIVST kits to the key population it is pertinent that these kits are affordable, preferably free of cost.In summary, this demonstration project has provided much-needed local and context specific evidence which supports HIVST availability to key populations and its acceptability among TGs. National programmes and implementers can use the information for effective programming especially the peer or community based approach for HIVST distribution. HIVST availability should be prioritized for key populations in Pakistan. Further implementation can generate lessons for other populations and relevant delivery models.(ZIP)Click here for additional data file.(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.16 Feb 2022
PONE-D-22-01177
Acceptability and feasibility of HIV self-testing among transgender people in Larkana, Pakistan: results from a demonstration project
PLOS ONE
Dear Dr. Altaf,Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 02 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.
A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.Kind regards,Dylan A Mordaunt, MB ChB, MPH, MHLM, FRACP, FAIDHAcademic EditorPLOS ONEJournal Requirements:When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found athttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf andhttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf2.Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.3. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.Additional Editor Comments:Thank you for your submission. We have had thorough reviewer input and so I will summarise the decision with reference to the criteria for publication:1. The study appears to present the results of original research.2. Results do not appear to have reported have not been published elsewhere- please include a reference to any preprints (which are allowed by PLoS).3. Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail. There are relatively minor issues addressed in detail by reviewer 1.4. Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data. Reviewer 1 has provided additional detail and valuable interpretation which the authors should consider and respond to.5. The article is presented in an intelligible fashion although one of the reviewers has commented on the standard of English. I don't see any major issues with the standard of English but it would be helpful to have this checked again prior to resubmission.6. The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity.7. The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability, although reviewer 1 comments on the use of some non-standard terms. Where possible it would be helpful to use reporting guidelines, standard terminology or clearly describe any non-standard terms.[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]Reviewers' comments:Reviewer's Responses to Questions
Comments to the Author1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: YesReviewer #2: Partly********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: N/AReviewer #2: Yes********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: YesReviewer #2: No********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: YesReviewer #2: No********** 5. Review Comments to the AuthorPlease use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: I think this is an interesting and important paper sharing the considerations on HIVST in Pakistan among transgender populations. This paper could be framed in a way that acknowledges the HIVST knowledge gaps in EMRO and among transgender people more so. Throughout the term demonstration project is used - and it is unclear how the authors define this and differentiated it from a pilot study or implementation science research. It is unclear how the national programme was involved and will be involved moving forward, though there are statements about this study informing policy work and providing evidence to support implementation. This needs to be supported more fully in the paper.1. Abstract. I would clarify from the beginning you are focusing on transgender people and be clear this is because of their risk and being key populations. I don't know if you need the brand name (OraQuick) in the abstract - just say oral fluid. Clarify if distribution was one kit per person. You note a (as in 1) follow-up call placed indicate that this was indeed just one and improve clarity on language as results indicates there was other follow-up time points and mechanisms. Felt like you could have noted the estimated PLHIV aware of status and TG testing coverage. Could make your results read more compelling on the potential benefits given the substantial testing and treatment gaps in Pakistan.2. Introduction- Unclear what you mean by Pakistan's data showing 84% increase in infections. Need reference and clarity.- I would mention KP briefly and directly focus on TG from the beginning in the intro - you can mention applicability for other KP in discussion. Data on other groups not as informative and confusing if trying to prioritize TG as a unique contribution of this paper. Globally there hasn't been as much data on HIVST use among TG - and this is important to capture insights and preferences for this group in addition to translating to broader understanding on HIVST in Pakistan. How are TG reached or not reach currently that should be explained - so the gaps and potential comes out more in addition to the general programme needs overall.- Clarify what you mean by new now - HIVST has been recommended since 2016 so it isn't new globally so adjust that point on "new approaches". Reasons why the product hasn't been introduced could be addressed more and how this study address gaps. Could be addressed in aims and objectives. With the country aiming to implement in 2022 - how this informs anything in addition to WHO guidance needs to be clearer. It seems like the country should have been able to implement the guidelines without research on acceptability - should be more the how to implement. So some background on why this study was needed should be clearer.- I don't think you need to say "Global Fund grant" and should acknowledge national programme leadership.- The history of the outbreak and testing in Larkana may be useful to note more - as there were many challenges with testing reported during this time.3. Methods- The sentence should read "A convenience sample of 150 TGs was recruited using oral fluid HIVST kits. OraQuick HIV Self-Test (OraSure Technologies Inc., Pennsylvania, US) was used in this study." The limited resources should be addressed separately and may be better placed in limitations and discussion for justifying why you used the methods you did.- Make this sentence into two sentences "The inclusion criteria were adults aged 18 years or above, self-identifying as TG and residing in Larkana. All enrolled participants reported that they were HIV negative or had not been tested in the past six months."- Points on consent should be in the ethics section for clarity on how participants were consented into the study and with ethical approval section explained.- Was consent written or verbal? Clarify how you ascertained the information about their ability to read instructions.- Acknowledging some role and support of national programme in addition to CBO would be valuable - as they should have some role or role in future that needs to be noted.- Further clarify if participants always provided just 1 kit. Efforts to document if anyone who took a kit home gave it to someone else.- What happened if the phone call led to no answer - was that the last attempt of contact? clarify.- The way data was captured doesn't come out clearly and leaves questions in results - was this a questionnaire that people filled in - were asked - some semi-structured questions? Greater clarity needed.4. Results- clarify oral fluid HIVST preference - this seems to be compared to professional fingerstick. So that should be revised in results and clarified if this is result or more of authors discussion point.5. Discussion- This is one of few HIVST studies in TG. Suggest highlighting hat - and the importance of this.- Registration and access to products should be raised as a key point for moving forward with the results - as well as the national programme aims and ability to move this CBO model forward.- Address the context of Larkana and community testing challenges in the recent outbreaks and how HIVST applicability specifically here when there were issues documented on efforts to scale-up testing in the district using existing models.- Linkage to ART in Pakistan is going to be a broader issue - i wouldnt say that the findings alleviate concern but confirm what has been found in other studies that people who test positive want to link. But access to ART and easier ways for KP to link remain a gap and a priority in Pakistan. Strategies to overcome this challenge in scaling up ART access and uptake need to continue to be prioritized. How does HIVST fit into this and other references to work in the country for addressing this?- We have seen literacy and education be a difference in urban vs rural, that could be worth noting that it is likely urban areas would have better feasibility. However some preferences for facility-based and blood testing have been observed in urban settings. Given limited access to testing in less urban areas, HIVST interest could be higher in Larkana.- Limitation on the incentive / compensation and relying on self-report means that they might not have been reporting accurately and self-report has a bias.- The concluding statements should focus on relevance for TG and KP, engaging with national programme, but it isnt clear that this evidence was "much needed" and will change things in Pakistan. Can that be addressed? Anything on what this work has helped inform and progress that it is true an 150 person study is leading to some policy changes and action should be added, otherwise it seems like it remains unclear why Pakistan hasnt implemented WHO guidelines that have been in place since 2016 and it's 2022.Reviewer #2: The final manuscript should be written in standard English with correction of typographic and gramatic errors.I do not have additional comments for the author, including concerns about research ethic********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: NoReviewer #2: No[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
Submitted filename: PlosONE_REVIEWER COMMENTS_BN_.edited.pdfClick here for additional data file.9 Jun 2022Two detailed files are attached.Submitted filename: Responses to reviewer 1_Arshad Altaf.docxClick here for additional data file.20 Jun 2022Acceptability and feasibility of HIV self-testing among transgender people in Larkana, Pakistan: results from a pilot projectPONE-D-22-01177R1Dear Dr. Altaf,We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.Kind regards,Dylan A Mordaunt, MD, MPH, FRACPAcademic EditorPLOS ONEAdditional Editor Comments (optional):Thank you for your resubmission. This now meets the criteria for publication.Reviewers' comments:30 Jun 2022PONE-D-22-01177R1Acceptability and feasibility of HIV self-testing among transgender people in Larkana, Pakistan: results from a pilot projectDear Dr. Altaf:I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.Kind regards,PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staffon behalf ofAssociate Professor Dylan A MordauntAcademic EditorPLOS ONE
Authors: Andrea L Wirtz; Soe Naing; Sandra Hsu Hnin Mon; Aung Zayar Paing; Ei Khine Mon; Kaung Htet Thu; Jasmine M Truong; Belinda Jivapong; Emily Clouse; Stefan D Baral; Chris Beyrer Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2021-11-22
Authors: Peter MacPherson; David G Lalloo; Emily L Webb; Hendramoorthy Maheswaran; Augustine T Choko; Simon D Makombe; Anthony E Butterworth; Joep J van Oosterhout; Nicola Desmond; Deus Thindwa; Stephen Bertel Squire; Richard J Hayes; Elizabeth L Corbett Journal: JAMA Date: 2014 Jul 23-30 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Muhammad S Jamil; Ingrid Eshun-Wilson; T Charles Witzel; Nandi Siegfried; Carmen Figueroa; Lastone Chitembo; Busisiwe Msimanga-Radebe; Muhammad S Pasha; Karin Hatzold; Elizabeth Corbett; Magdalena Barr-DiChiara; Alison J Rodger; Peter Weatherburn; Elvin Geng; Rachel Baggaley; Cheryl Johnson Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2021-07-07