| Literature DB >> 35802370 |
Satoko Fujimoto1,2, Atsuya Miki1,3, Kazuichi Maruyama1,4, Song Mei5, Zaixing Mao5, Zhenguo Wang5, Kinpui Chan5, Kohji Nishida1,6.
Abstract
Purpose: Intrachoroidal cavitations (ICCs) are peripapillary pathological lesions generally associated with high myopia that can cause visual field (VF) defects. The current study aimed to evaluate a three-dimensional (3D) volume parameter of ICCs segmented from volumetric swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) images processed using deep learning (DL)-based noise reduction and to investigate its correlation with VF sensitivity.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35802370 PMCID: PMC9279919 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.11.7.1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol ISSN: 2164-2591 Impact factor: 3.048
Figure 1.(A) The flowchart for 3D ICC detection. CSI, choroidal–sclera interface. (B) A late-phase indocyanine green angiography image of an ICC; no blood flow can be seen in the ICC. (C) An image of the measurement of 2D parameters of ICCs by every 30° (dotted and continuous white lines) around the disc center. (D) A B-scan image of the continuous white line in (C). ICC depth and length were measured at each location.
Figure 2.(A) Representative 3D image of an ICC. (B) Fundus photograph. (C) Schema of the spatial relationship between ICCs and the edge of the BMO (the blue circle indicates the edge of the BMO, and the red zone indicates the ICC zone). (D) Upper image shows the visual field defect, and the lower image shows total deviation. (E) Data distribution plots between ICC volume and VFMD. ICC volume was correlated negatively with VFMD. (F) Data distribution plots between ICC volume and the superior mean total deviation. ICC volume was correlated negatively with the superior mean total deviation.
Baseline Characteristics and Correlation With ICC Volume
| Characteristic | Mean (SD) | Standardized Coefficient |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 52.5 (6.3) | −0.003 | 0.95 |
| Refractive error (D) | −8.4 (3.2) | −0.34 | 0.26 |
| Axial length (mm) | 27.1 (1.4) | 0.53 | 0.0611 |
| Intraocular pressure (mmHg) | 13.6 (2.8) | 0.037 | 0.91 |
| Optic disc ovality index | 1.30 (0.18) | −0.30 | 0.32 |
| Humphrey field analyzer medial division (dB) | −2.61 (3.16) | −0.64 | 0.0197 |
P < 0.05.
Figure 3.All 13 overlay images between ICCs and ONHs. (A–M) All ICCs are in direct contact with the edges of the BMO. (L) and (M) show two of the 13 cases that had overlap between ICCs and ONHs. The blue circles indicate the edges of the BMO, the red zones indicate the ICC zones, and the pink zones indicate the ONH–ICC overlay zone.
Figure 4.Representative cases of direct contact between ICCs and edges of the BMO. (A) There is no overlap in this case between the ICC and ONH. (B) A case with overlap; the blue circles indicate the edges of the BMO, the red zones indicate the ICC zones, the pink zone indicates the ICC–ONH overlay zone, and the yellow lines indicate slices of the OCT scans. (C) The disc photograph in (A). (D) The disc photograph in (B). (E) The OCT B-scan image of the yellow line in (A). (F) The OCT B-scan image of the yellow line in (B); the yellow arrowheads indicate the tissue of Jacoby. The ONH and ICC are separated by the tissue of Jacoby.