| Literature DB >> 35802165 |
M Ferrer-Quintero1,2,3, D Fernández4,5,6,7,8, R López-Carrilero4,5,6, I Birulés4,9, A Barajas10,11, E Lorente-Rovira5,12, A Luengo12, L Díaz-Cutraro4,13, M Verdaguer4,10,14, H García-Mieres4,5, A Gutiérrez-Zotes5,15, E Grasa5,16, E Pousa5,16,17,18, E Huerta-Ramos4,5, T Pélaez4,5, M L Barrigón19,20, J Gómez-Benito9,21, F González-Higueras22, I Ruiz-Delgado23, J Cid24, S Moritz25, J Sevilla-Llewellyn-Jones26, S Ochoa4,5.
Abstract
Deficits in social cognition and metacognition impact the course of psychosis. Sex differences in social cognition and metacognition could explain heterogeneity in psychosis. 174 (58 females) patients with first-episode psychosis completed a clinical, neuropsychological, social cognitive, and metacognitive assessment. Subsequent latent profile analysis split by sex yielded two clusters common to both sexes (a Homogeneous group, 53% and 79.3%, and an Indecisive group, 18.3% and 8.6% of males and females, respectively), a specific male profile characterized by presenting jumping to conclusions (28.7%) and a specific female profile characterized by cognitive biases (12.1%). Males and females in the homogeneous profile seem to have a more benign course of illness. Males with jumping to conclusions had more clinical symptoms and more neuropsychological deficits. Females with cognitive biases were younger and had lower self-esteem. These results suggest that males and females may benefit from specific targeted treatment and highlights the need to consider sex when planning interventions.Entities:
Keywords: Metacognition; Profiles; Psychosis; Schizophrenia; Sex differences; Social cognition
Year: 2022 PMID: 35802165 DOI: 10.1007/s00406-022-01438-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci ISSN: 0940-1334 Impact factor: 5.760