| Literature DB >> 35800957 |
Abstract
Chengguan, the Urban Administrative Law Enforcement Bureau, has been criticized for its dismal public image and poor job performance. Based on an ethnographic case study in Z City, we analyzed the type of leadership that results in passive work performance in Chengguan, and we examined whether any leadership style can be used to improve Chengguan's image and performance. We developed a new leadership ontology of CNP (Cognition-Normalization-Performance) on this foundation, and ethnographic research was conducted in three phases: leader's cognition, followers' normalization, and organization performance. Several implications were drawn. Leader selection should be cautious and can be improved by studying the leader's traits and behavior. This is done by investigating candidates' leadership career paths, trait characteristics, motive profiles, and other qualities. It is useful to change leaders by strengthening followers' unity and cohesion by setting up a labor union, youth federation, women's federation, and other groups. A leader should be selected among individuals who have completed leadership training as opposed to appointing one from outside the organization. On the one hand, the superior should help to improve the leadership environment (context), supervise problems in the organization's operation and performance, and track changes over time. On the other hand, the leader can also provide the followers with a flexible and adaptive place of work.Entities:
Keywords: Chengguan; behavior; ethnographic; leadership; organization
Year: 2022 PMID: 35800957 PMCID: PMC9253826 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.857043
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1Leadership ontology Cognition–Normalization–Performance (CNP).
Metrics of Chengguan performance criteria.
| Law enforcement discipline | Article 8: Urban management law enforcement personnel shall perform their duties on the basis of the legally prescribed authority, scope, procedures, and time limits and must not have the following conduct: |
| Case-handling norms | Article 12: Urban management law enforcement personnel shall lawfully carry out evidence prior registration, preservation, or sealing of sites and facilities, and seizure of property. Urban management law enforcement personnel shall properly store property that has been registered for preservation or seizure in advance and must not use, intercept, damage, or dispose of it without authorization. |
| Specifications for the use of equipment | Article 15: When urban management law enforcement personnel carry out law enforcement, they shall turn on audio-visual equipment, record the law enforcement process without interruption, promptly and completely store law enforcement audio-visual materials, and must not delete, alter, or transmit the original records. |
| Norms of manners and language | Article 20: When urban management law enforcement personnel carry out law enforcement, they shall behave in a dignified manner, have good posture, and behave appropriately and must not eat or fan while walking; they must not smoke in public places or other places where smoking is prohibited; they must not have their hands behind their backs, sleeve their hands, pockets, shoulders, arms, or waists, and laugh or make loud noises. |
| Article 21: When urban management law enforcement personnel carry out law enforcement, they shall first raise their hands in salute to their administrative counterparts. | |
| Article 22: Urban management law enforcement personnel shall treat others with courtesy, use civilized and standardized language, and must not use vulgar, discriminatory, reprimanding, insulting, or threatening language against administrative counterparts. |
Analysis of the leadership, practices, and work performance of the seven directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First director (December 2001–May 2005) | December 2001: 2 vice directors and 8 clerks were transferred from the municipal government to create the bureau. May 2002: 20 college students were recruited as clerks. June 2003: 6 demobilized soldiers entered the bureau. May 2003: 15 college students were recruited as clerks. July 2013: 6 clerks were transferred to other departments of the municipal government through an exam. December 2014: 30 demobilized soldiers entered the bureau; when the first director stepped down, around 75 clerks were present in the bureau. | Trait characteristics: | 1. Line-up for counting | Municipal government appraisal was poor. Most clerks worked with a go-slow attitude. Some clerks escaped from the bureau; some of them accused the mayor. |
| Second director (May 2005–August 2009) | May 2005: 15 college students were recruited as clerks Normal staff entered or exited in single figures, and by the end of August 2009, the total clerks of the bureau were 100 or so. The main body still was college students; several troublemakers among the 30 demobilized soldiers consisted of a new section—inspection. There were no open objections from the clerks. The second director adopted a “carrot and stick” approach to treat the two main groups of clerks: it sets up some mid-level cadre positions to solicit potential troublemakers from among the demobilized soldiers, but it also intimidated the college students. | Trait characteristics: | 1. Strengthened the practice of line-up for counting | Municipal government appraisal was good at the beginning and poor finally: the director confessed that he was “unable to bring people together.” at the end. |
| Third director (August 2009–April 2011) | Six town law enforcement stations were approved, and around 20 clerks were enlisted. Most are demobilized soldiers and a few were transferred from other departments of municipal governments. About 120 clerks were in the bureau at this point. College students and demobilized soldiers had equal weight. | Trait characteristics: | 1. Weakened supervision of the practice of line-up for counting | Municipal government appraisal was good promotion to be a commissionar of Z Public Security Bureau. |
| Fourth director (April 2011–June 2014) | Personnel composition was constant. The bureau started to employ auxiliary clerks to assist work. The auxiliary clerks (first batch is 20 people; increased rapidly to around 100) were not the formal staff; they signed a contract with municipal government personnel bureau and worked under the arrangement of the Chengguan bureau. | Trait characteristics: | 1. Abolished the fine index for subordinate divisions | Municipal government appraisal was good at first, then mediocre. |
| Fifth director | Regular personnel flow without much change |
|
| |
| Sixth director (May 2015–June 2017) | Several batches of demobilized soldiers (Chengguan bureau was the main venue for their resettlement) enlisted with the bureau, now numbering 150. | Trait characteristics: | 1. Strengthened the practice of line-up for counting | Municipal government appraisal was mediocre |
| Seventh director (June 2017–June 2020) | 40 Municipal Patrol Brigade clerks, who belonged to the Municipal Public Security Bureau before, were allocated to Chengguan bureau. Most of the 40 Municipal Patrol Brigade clerks were demobilized soldiers; at this time, the portion of the demobilized soldiers accounted about 60% to the total numbers of clerks. Clerks united to push the seventh director abolish the line-up for counting practice, as well as address other honorable issues for clerks… As of June 2020, there were 186 members in the Z Chengguan bureau. | Trait characteristics: | 1. Abolished the practice of line-up for counting | Municipal government appraisal was good the Director promoted to be a director-equivalent leader of Z Public Security Bureau |
The work performance is according to the municipal government's assessment of its departments: percentage ranking 99–90 is excellent, 90–70 is good, 70–10 is mediocre, and 10–0 is poor. The percentage range may change slightly in different years.
The Maxwell style levels of leadership are (1) position, (2) permission, (3) production, (4) people development, and (5) pinnacle.