| Literature DB >> 35800947 |
Abstract
The detection and prevention strategies for drug control have gained significant attention from the drug control committees globally and need the researchers' attention to improve these strategies worldwide. Hence, this research investigates the impact of the status quo (SQ) and resistance to the innovative nature of the drug control committee on the failure of detection and prevention strategies (FDPS) in Malaysia. This article also analyzes the mediating role of poor team performance (PTP) among the SQ and resistance to the innovative nature of the drug control committee and the FDPS in Malaysia. This study has employed the primary data collection ways such as questionnaires to gather the data from selected respondents. The researchers also applied the SPSS-AMOS to check the association among variables and testing of hypotheses. The results revealed that the SQ and resistance to the innovative nature of the drug control committee have a positive association with the FDPS in Malaysia. The findings have also exposed that PTP significantly mediates between the SQ and resistance to the innovative nature of the drug control committee and the FDPS in Malaysia. This study guides the policymakers that they should develop the policies that eliminate the SQ nature and motivate the committee to adopt innovations that enhance the team performance and success of detection and prevention strategies in Malaysia.Entities:
Keywords: drug control committee; failure of detection and prevention strategies; poor team performance; resistance to the innovative nature; status quo
Year: 2022 PMID: 35800947 PMCID: PMC9255556 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.922785
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1The value of Pharma products exported from Malaysia.
FIGURE 2Theoretical model.
Convergent validity.
| Constructs | Items | Loadings | CR | AVE |
|
| SQ6 | 0.624 | 0.889 | 0.584 |
| SQ5 | 0.643 | |||
| SQ4 | 0.604 | |||
| SQ3 | 0.619 | |||
| SQ2 | 0.981 | |||
| SQ1 | 0.995 | |||
| Resistance to innovation nature | RTIN5 | 0.645 | 0.843 | 0.527 |
| RTIN4 | 0.527 | |||
| RTIN3 | 0.639 | |||
| RTIN2 | 0.860 | |||
| RTIN1 | 0.892 | |||
| Poor team performance | PTP5 | 0.807 | 0.945 | 0.775 |
| PTP4 | 0.923 | |||
| PTP3 | 0.975 | |||
| PTP2 | 0.815 | |||
| PTP1 | 0.870 | |||
| Failure of detection and prevention strategies | FDPS4 | 0.923 | 0.783 | 0.513 |
| FDPS3 | 0.946 | |||
| FDPS2 | 0.405 | |||
| FDPS1 | 0.380 |
Discriminant validity.
| FDPS | SQ | RTIN | PTP | |
| FDPS | 0.716 | |||
| SQ | 0.531 | 0.764 | ||
| RTIN | 0.615 | 0.435 | 0.726 | |
| PTP | 0.385 | 0.468 | 0.504 | 0.880 |
Direct path.
| Relationships | Beta | S.E. | C.R. |
| ||
| Poor team performance | ← |
| 0.409 | 0.054 | 7.597 |
|
| Poor team performance | ← | Resistance to innovation nature | 0.283 | 0.05 | 5.626 |
|
| Failure of detection and prevention strategies | ← |
| 0.362 | 0.047 | 7.629 |
|
| Failure of detection and prevention strategies | ← | Resistance to innovation nature | 0.461 | 0.043 | 10.744 |
|
| Failure of detection and prevention strategies | ← | Poor team performance | 0.086 | 0.043 | 1.987 | 0.047 |
***Show significant at 1%.
FIGURE 3Measurement model assessment.
Mediation analysis.
| SQ | RTIN | |||
|
|
| |||
| Beta | Beta | |||
| Total effects | 0.453 | 0.000 | 0.254 | 0.000 |
| Direct effects | 0.292 | 0.023 | 0.282 | 0.000 |
| Indirect effects | 0.325 | 0.003 | 0.022 | 0.013 |
FIGURE 4Structural model assessment.