| Literature DB >> 35800934 |
Pinglei Xu1,2, Ying Jiang2.
Abstract
Despite the growing trend of Information and communication technology (ICT), little is known about its impact on job satisfaction and the mechanisms through which ICT operates. This study aimed to investigate new generation teachers' ICT use on efficacy and job satisfaction. We conducted a cross-sectional survey on 234 new generation teachers in China. The Results revealed that ICT use had a positive direct impact on job satisfaction of new generation teachers. Teachers' efficacy plays a partial mediating role and error aversion culture moderates the relationship between ICT use and teachers' efficacy. This study complements our attempt to understanding the effect, mechanism and boundary condition of ICT use on new generation teachers' work outcomes. It also provides a new direction for studying ICT use on employees belonging to other generations.Entities:
Keywords: efficacy; error aversion culture; information and communication technology; job satisfaction and psychological emotion; new generation teachers
Year: 2022 PMID: 35800934 PMCID: PMC9255551 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.941218
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1The proposed model of ICT use and job satisfaction.
Sample characteristics and distribution (N = 234).
| Demographics | Categories | Number | % |
| Gender | Male | 98 | 41.9 |
| Female | 136 | 58.1 | |
| Age | 22–25 years | 79 | 33.8 |
| 25–30 years | 66 | 28.2 | |
| 30–40 years | 81 | 34.6 | |
| 40–43 years | 8 | 3.4 | |
| Education | Junior college or below | 19 | 8.1 |
| University | 171 | 73.1 | |
| Graduate school | 44 | 18.8 | |
| Teaching tenture | Blow 3 years | 89 | 38 |
| 3–6 years | 62 | 26.5 | |
| 6–9 years | 61 | 26.1 | |
| 9–15 years | 18 | 7.7 | |
| 15 years or above | 4 | 1.7 |
Comparison of the goodness-of-fit indices of alternative models.
| model | χ2 | df | χ2/df | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | SRMR |
| Four factor model: ICT, JS, EF, and ER | 793.195 | 489 | 1.622 | 0.904 | 0.897 | 0.052 | 0.059 |
| Three-factor model: ICT, JS + EF, and ER | 872.662 | 492 | 1.773 | 0.880 | 0.872 | 0.058 | 0.062 |
| Two-factor model: ICT + ER and JS + EF | 1,330.432 | 494 | 2.693 | 0.737 | 0.719 | 0.085 | 0.145 |
| Single factor model: ICT + ER + JS + EF | 1,949.873 | 495 | 3.939 | 0.543 | 0.512 | 0.112 | 0.122 |
ICT, ICT use; JS, job satisfaction; EF, teachers efficacy; ER, error aversion culture.
Mean, standard deviation, and correlation coefficient of all variables.
| Variable | Mean | S.D. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| (1) ICT use | 5.609 | 0.689 | 1 | |||||||
| (2) Job satisfaction | 5.665 | 0.691 | 0.538 | 1 | ||||||
| (3) Teachers efficacy | 5.814 | 0.564 | 0.579 | 0.673 | 1 | |||||
| (4) Errors aversion culture | 3.094 | 1.261 | −0.190 | −0.210 | −0.124 | 1 | ||||
| (5) Gender | 0.419 | 0.494 | 0.073 | 0.123 | 0.102 | 0.075 | 1 | |||
| (6) Teaching tenure | 2.085 | 1.049 | 0.273 | 0.319 | 0.495 | 0.129 | 0.096 | 1 | ||
| (7) Education level | 2.107 | 0.509 | 0.109 | 0.151 | 0.228 | 0.251 | 0.146 | 0.176 | 1 | |
| (8) Work values | 5.986 | 0.467 | 0.507 | 0.494 | 0.628 | −0.123 | 0.03 | 0.183 | 0.041 | 1 |
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, n = 234.
Results of regression analysis.
| Variable | Job satisfaction | Self-efficacy | ||||
|
|
| |||||
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | |
| Control variables | ||||||
| Gender | 0.107 | 0.091 | 0.076 | 0.035 | 0.024 | 0.034 |
| Teaching tenure | 0.142 | 0.103 | −0.004 | 0.197 | 0.173 | 0.189 |
| Education level | 0.114 | 0.089 | 0.005 | 0.151 | 0.136 | 0.177 |
| Work value | 0.664 | 0.429 | 0.105 | 0.670 | 0.524 | 0.521 |
| | ||||||
| ICT use | 0.338 | 0.208 | 0.211 | 0.191 | ||
| | ||||||
| Teacher efficacy | 0.619 | |||||
| | ||||||
| Errors aversion culture | −0.045 | |||||
| ICT use | −0.062 | |||||
| R2 | 0.312 | 0.392 | 0.492 | 0.564 | 0.61 | 0.627 |
| Adjusted R2 | 0.300 | 0.379 | 0.479 | 0.556 | 0.602 | 0.616 |
| 26.004 | 29.449 | 36.660 | 73.956 | 71.391 | 54.363 | |
Non-standard regression coefficient, ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.
FIGURE 2Moderating effect of error aversion culture.