Literature DB >> 35800579

Bilateral mucinous ovarian carcinoma in a young female with tumor weighing 41.1 kg.

Kavita Khoiwal1, Payal Kumari1, Deepika Dhundi1, Om Kumari1, Anshu Gupta1, Priyanka Gupta2, Sonu Sama2, Pankaj Sharma3, Michael Anthony4, Amrita Gaurav1, Jaya Chaturvedi1.   

Abstract

Mucinous ovarian carcinoma is a less-prevalent subtype of epithelial tumors. We present a case of giant mucinous ovarian carcinoma weighing 41.1 kg in a 24-year-old Indian girl. Benign mucinous tumors have the potential to reach an enormous size but such a huge malignant mucinous tumor is very rare in literature and its occurrence in a young female is even rarer. Copyright:
© 2022 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  41.1 Kg; bilateral mucinous ovarian carcinoma; huge ovarian tumor; young Indian girl

Year:  2022        PMID: 35800579      PMCID: PMC9254784          DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_421_21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care        ISSN: 2249-4863


Introduction

Epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) is the most common histopathological variant of ovarian malignancy. It predominantly occurs in postmenopausal women; merely 10%–15% of EOCs are reported in premenopausal women.[1] Furthermore, <1% of them occur in women younger than 30 years.[1] Mucinous ovarian carcinoma is a comparatively less-prevalent subtype of EOCs (3%–5%) and only 10% of them are bilateral.[2] Mucinous ovarian tumors are slow-growing tumors and have the potential to grow enormously. Most of the reported cases of huge ovarian mass are benign, mucinous cystadenoma [Table 1].[3456789] It is quite uncommon for a malignant ovarian tumor to be presented as a huge abdominal mass; primary care physicians should be vigilant not to miss an ovarian malignancy as one of the possible causes and should not delay referral to the gynecologist or oncologist.
Table 1

Cases reported in the Literature of Huge Ovarian Tumor

Author, YearAge (years)Pre/postmenopausalTumor Weight (kg)HPEHPE type of ovarian tumorOutcome
Akhras et al. (2019)[3]72Postmenopausal27BenignMucinous cystadenomaFair
Gwanzura et al. (2019)[4]48PostmenopausalOccupying whole abdominal cavityBenignMucinous cystadenomaDied
de Lima et al. (2014)[5]57Postmenopausal40MalignantMucinous cystadenocarcinomaFair
Madhu YC, et al. (2013)[6]55Postmenopausal56.95BenignMucinous cystadenomaFair
Fobe D, et al. (2010)[7]24Premenopausal59BenignMucosal-serosal cystadenoma with borderline potentialFair
Hackethal et al. (2008)[8]60Postmenopausal60BenignMucinous cystadenomaFair
Yanazume Y, et al. (2007)[9]30Premenopausal100MalignantMucinous cystadenocarcinomaDied
Present Case24Premenopausal41.1MalignantMucinous cystadenocarcinomaFair

HPE - Histopathology

Cases reported in the Literature of Huge Ovarian Tumor HPE - Histopathology We present a case of giant mucinous ovarian carcinoma weighing 41.1 kg (90.61 pounds) in a young Indian girl.

Case Presentation

A 24-year-old unmarried girl presented with abdominal distension and dull aching pain abdomen for 6 years with difficulty in walking, standing, and breathing for 1 year. She was cachexic, anemic, and hypoproteinemic, weighing 78.8 kg on presentation. The abdomen was grossly distended from epigastrium to hypogastrium [Figure 1a]. A huge cystic to firm abdominopelvic mass with ill-defined borders was palpated. CECT abdomen and pelvis [Figure 1b] showed a large multiloculated cystic lesion (51 cm × 40 cm × 30 cm) occupying the whole abdominopelvic cavity with right gross hydroureteronephrosis. Tumor marker evaluation revealed raised CA-125 (160 U/L), CA19-9 (9314 U/mI), CEA (253 ng/mI), LDH (456 U/I), normal AFP, and Beta-HCG. Upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy and colonoscopy were normal, done in view of raised CA19-9, and to rule out primary GI malignancy.
Figure 1

(a) Grossly distended abdomen suggestive of huge abdominopelvic mass; (b) CECT Abdomen and pelvis (sagittal view); (c) Intraoperative image; (d) HPE image showing tumor cells with mucin, nuclear atypia and marked cellular stratification (H and E × 400)

(a) Grossly distended abdomen suggestive of huge abdominopelvic mass; (b) CECT Abdomen and pelvis (sagittal view); (c) Intraoperative image; (d) HPE image showing tumor cells with mucin, nuclear atypia and marked cellular stratification (H and E × 400) A multidisciplinary team was formed and planned for staging laparotomy with the consent of intraoperative and postoperative morbidity and mortality. Preoperative right-sided percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) was done in view of gross hydroureteronephrosis. Anemia and hypoproteinemia were corrected. On laparotomy, a 60 cm × 50 cm × 40 cm multiloculated mass adhered to the abdominal wall was noted with large omental feeding vessels. Mass was gradually decompressed as advised by the anesthetist to avoid sudden hemodynamic instability. During aspiration, cardiopulmonary parameters did not change. Precaution to avoid tumor spillage was taken. Approximately 36 liters of thick straw-colored mucinous fluid was drained. After adhesiolysis, mass was seen arising from the left ovary [Figure 1c]. Left adnexectomy was performed. The specimen weighed 5.1 kg, making the total weight of ovarian mass 41.1 kg. A 5 cm × 4 cm simple cyst in the right ovary and multiple tumor deposits (~1 cm) in Pouch of Douglas were also noted. The uterus was normal in size with no tumor deposits. Urinary bladder, omentum, undersurface of liver, diaphragm, spleen, large and small bowel were free of tumor. Bilateral pelvic and paraaortic lymph nodes were not palpable. The parietal and pelvic peritoneum was grossly normal. Intraoperative imprint cytology of left ovarian mass was suggestive of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. Therefore, complete cytoreductive surgery including total abdominal hysterectomy, right salpingo-ovariotomy, total omentectomy, bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection, appendicectomy, peritonectomy and removal of POD tumor deposits was performed. Estimated blood loss was 4.5 liters. The surgery lasted for 6 hours and patient was transferred to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for cardiopulmonary support. She received massive blood transfusion in the perioperative period and had a prolonged ICU stay. Approximately 60% of her bodyweight was removed in the form of tumor, and she took almost one muonth to recover. In immediate postoperative period, the patient was kept on ventilatory support and inotropes as she was not able to maintain intravascular volume. Broad-spectrum antibiotics were given to cover both aerobic and anaerobic organisms. On postoperative day (POD) 2, she developed sudden hypotension and bradycardia followed by asystole, prompt cardiopulmonary resuscitation was given and revived successfully. She had an episode of paroxysmal supra-ventricular tachycardia on POD 4, managed with amiodarone. She developed metabolic derangements i.e., hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, and hypomagnesemia; 2D echocardiography showed global left ventricular hypokinesia, LVEF-20%, mild MR, and mild TR. Electrolyte correction was given accordingly. Injection albumin was given daily for 10 days to correct hypoalbuminemia. On POD 7, patient was hemodynamically better and extubated and inotropic support was gradually weaned off. But next day only, she was not maintaining saturation on noninvasive ventilation and was electively intubated. Followed by this, she developed subcutaneous emphysema over her face and neck, airway injury was suspected; urgent CT thorax suggested left gross pneumothorax and gross pneumomediastinum [Figure 2a] for which emergency intercostal drain (ICD) insertion and CT guided pigtail insertion in pneumomediastinum was performed [Figure 2b]. Patient was restarted on inotropes. Tracheostomy was performed on POD 10 in view of prolonged intubation and difficulty in weaning off. Patient started improving gradually, inotropes weaned off on POD 15, ICD and pigtail were removed on POD 19. Tracheostomy tube was removed on POD 22. Repeat 2D echocardiography was suggestive of normal left ventricular function. PCN was removed as hydroureteronephrosis was resolved in review scan. Patient developed grade III/IV bed sores due to prolonged immobilisation which were recovered by daily dressing, improved diet and ambulation. Her body weight on the day of discharge was 31.3 kg.
Figure 2

(a) Axial CECT image showing gross pneumomediastinum with subcutaneous emphysema in anterior chest wall; (b) Axial CT image post pigtail insertion in pneumomediastinum

(a) Axial CECT image showing gross pneumomediastinum with subcutaneous emphysema in anterior chest wall; (b) Axial CT image post pigtail insertion in pneumomediastinum Final histopathology [Figure 1d] was suggestive of bilateral mucinous carcinoma of ovary with left parietal peritoneum and pouch of Douglas involvement - FIGO stage IIIA (immunohistochemistry; ER and PR - negative, p53 - diffuse nuclear positivity, CDX2 - nuclear positivity, CK20 and CK7 - positive). She is currently on platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy and received 9 weekly cycles uneventfully. Institutional Ethical Board approval (AIIMS/IEC/20/643) and consent from the patient was obtained for publication.

Discussion

Our case was unique due to the occurrence of bilateral mucinous ovarian carcinoma in a young female with a tumor weighing 41.1 kg. A similar case of giant mucinous ovarian malignancy was reported in a 30 years old woman by Yanazume (2007) but unfortunately, patient could not withstand surgery and died 12 hours postoperatively due to massive blood loss and DIC.[9] Giant ovarian tumors alter the patient’s anatomy, physiology and psychology. Pressure symptoms, elevation of diaphragm, compromised lung capacity, impaired venous return and decreased cardiac output are caused by such huge intra-abdominal masses. Furthermore, removal of these tumors are associated with innumerable complications. Cardiovascular problems are the most common followed by respiratory complications and splanchnic shock. In our case too, patient developed sudden hypotension followed by cardiac arrest on POD 2, fortunately she could revived successfully. Monitoring in ICU, early recognition of complications and immediate management are pivotal for optimum outcome. Ideally in such cases, an attempt should be made to remove the mass intact to avoid dissemination of tumor but we decompressed the tumor gradually to avoid sudden hemodynamic instability. Guraslan H, et al.[10] contemplated controlled fluid aspiration before or during surgery to prevent risk associated with sudden intraabdominal pressure changes. In early stage, prognosis remains good but advanced staged tumors have a poor prognosis as mucinous tumors are relatively chemoresistant. Hence, cytoreduction should be optimum. Fertility sparing surgery should be considered in young patients in stage I but not beyond stage Ic3.[11] It was not an option in our case as intraoperative findings were suggestive of stage IIb and moreover, patient and her mother were keen for complete surgery in one go and not willing for a second surgery. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest malignant ovarian tumor being reported from India and the first of its kind in the world being presented at such a young age with a 41.1 kg ovarian malignancy and survived after the surgery. Preoperative optimisation, anticipation of complications and monitoring in intensive care unit are crucial for a fair outcome.

Key points

Rare histopathological type: Mucinous ovarian carcinoma is a less prevalent subtype of Epithelial ovarian carcinoma (3%–5%). Bilaterality: It was a case of bilateral mucinous ovarian carcinoma, only 10% of mucinous ovarian malignancies are bilateral. Age of presentation: Most of the mucinous ovarian cancers present in postmenopausal women but in our case it was presented in a young 24 year old female. Size: Most of the large ovarian tumors reported in literature are benign in nature (mucinous cystadenoma) but it was malignant in our case (mucinous cystadenocarcinoma). Prognosis: This is the largest malignant ovarian tumor being reported from India and the first of its kind in the world being presented at such a young age with a 41.1 kg ovarian malignancy and survived after the surgery.

Ethical committee approval

The study has been approved by the Institutional Ethical Board - AIIMS/IEC/20/643.

Declaration of patient consent

Consent for publication was obtained from the patient.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  9 in total

1.  A successful management of a giant mucinous ovarian tumor with intraoperative controlled fluid aspiration.

Authors:  H Güraslan; L Yaşar; M Ekin; C Kaya; H Cengiz; M Gonenc
Journal:  Eur J Gynaecol Oncol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.196

2.  Giant ovarian cancer weighing 100 kg with poor prognosis.

Authors:  Yumi Yanazume; Mitsuhiro Yoshinaga; Shintaro Yanazume; Tetsuya Kamikihara; Makoto Tokunaga; Masaki Kamio; Tsutomu Douchi
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.730

3.  Removal of enormous bilateral mucinous cystadenomas of the ovaries with abdominal plastic reconstruction.

Authors:  Andreas Hackethal; Doerthe Brueggmann; Maxim Turovets; Birgit Bassaly; Anika Stein; Eva-Louise Gerber; Karsten Muenstedt
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 4.  Fertility-sparing treatment for early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: Contemporary oncologic, reproductive and endocrinologic perspectives.

Authors:  Rachel S Mandelbaum; Maximilian Klar; Tsuyoshi Takiuchi; Liat Bainvoll; Shinya Matsuzaki; Richard J Paulson; Koji Matsuo
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 1.730

5.  Giant mucinous cystadenoma: a case report.

Authors:  Chipo Gwanzura; Annie Fungai Muyotcha; Thulani Magwali; Zvavahera Mike Chirenje; Mugove Gerald Madziyire
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2019-06-14

6.  A 57-year-old Brazilian woman with a giant mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the ovary: a case report.

Authors:  Sergio Henrique Mattioda de Lima; Vitorino Modesto Dos Santos; Andersen Charles Darós; Victor Paranaíba Campos; Fabiana Ruas Domingues Modesto
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2014-03-04

7.  Complete resection of a giant ovarian tumour.

Authors:  Y C Madhu; K Harish; Pipara Gotam
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Case Rep       Date:  2013-05-10

8.  Therapeutic options for mucinous ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Kylie L Gorringe; Dane Cheasley; Matthew J Wakefield; Georgina L Ryland; Prue E Allan; Kathryn Alsop; Kaushalya C Amarasinghe; Sumitra Ananda; David D L Bowtell; Michael Christie; Yoke-Eng Chiew; Michael Churchman; Anna DeFazio; Sian Fereday; C Blake Gilks; Charlie Gourley; Alison M Hadley; Joy Hendley; Sally M Hunter; Scott H Kaufmann; Catherine J Kennedy; Martin Köbel; Cecile Le Page; Jason Li; Richard Lupat; Orla M McNally; Jessica N McAlpine; Jan Pyman; Simone M Rowley; Carolina Salazar; Hugo Saunders; Timothy Semple; Andrew N Stephens; Niko Thio; Michelle C Torres; Nadia Traficante; Magnus Zethoven; Yoland C Antill; Ian G Campbell; Clare L Scott
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  A 27-kg Giant Ovarian Mucinous Cystadenoma in a 72-Year-Old Postmenopausal Patient: A Case Report.

Authors:  Lama Nathem Akhras; Lana Nathem Akhras; Saifudheen Faroog; Lamiaa AlSebay
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2019-11-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.