| Literature DB >> 35800535 |
Vikas Kumar Panwar1, Jyoti Mohan Tosh1, Ankur Mittal1, Tushar Aditya Narain2, Arup Kumar Mandal1, Harkirat Singh Talwar1.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess various etiologies, diagnosis and management. This rare entity is a neglected condition which should always be under clinical suspicion by broad speciality of practitioners for early treatment. Retrospective data collected from 2018 to 2021 in the All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh was used. All patients diagnosed with the small contracted bladder in the given period were included. The primary outcome of the study was to find out the common causes, early tests used for diagnosis and management done in the patients of small contracted bladder attending this tertiary care centre. Between 2018 and 2021, a total of 12 patients were diagnosed to have small capacity bladder (SCB). The most common symptom was frequency (75%). On cystoscopy, 33.33% (n = 4) had less than 50 ml and 66.66% (n = 8) had 50-100 ml bladder capacity respectively. 37.5% (n = 3) were diagnosed by urine AFB culture, 62.5% (n = 5) were diagnosed by urine for PCR, 62.5% (n = 5) were diagnosed by radiological investigations. Eight patients (66.66%) underwent surgical treatment in cases diagnosed as tuberculosis like augmentation cystoplasty and supra-trigonal cystectomy. Other rare causes found were eosinophilic cystitis, radiation induced contracture and BCG induced contracture. Small capacity bladder is an unusual condition, with still dilemma on the definition of small capacity and only few literature mentioning the causes, diagnosis and treatment. Even though tuberculosis is a common cause of SCB, still rare causes should always be kept in mind for relieving patient symptoms at the earliest. Copyright:Entities:
Keywords: Augmentation cystoplasty; small contracted bladder; tuberculosis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35800535 PMCID: PMC9254857 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1926_21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Family Med Prim Care ISSN: 2249-4863
Demographic and clinical profile
| Parameters | Value |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 50.83 (17-65) |
| Sex | Male 9 (75%) |
| Female 3 (25%) | |
| Time of initial presentation (months) | 9 months |
| <6 months | 5 (41.66%) |
| >6 months | 7 (58.33%) |
| Previous history of ATT | 6 (50%) |
| Pulmonary TB | 5 |
| GUTB | 1 |
| Abdominal TB | 0 |
| Initial presentation | |
| Frequent urination | 9 (75%) |
| Burning micturition | 7 (58%) |
| Hematuria | 5 (42%) |
| Flank pain | 1 (8%) |
| Fever | 1 (8%) |
| Incontinence | 1 (8%) |
| Additional risk factors | |
| BCG Therapy | 2 |
| Radiation | 1 |
Figure 1a: MCU of a patient of small capacity bladder (approx. 80 mL) with Left VUR. b: MCU of a patient with small capacity bladder (approx. 60 mL) with Left Grade V VUR and right grade IV VUR
Investigations and treatment
| Investigations | Value |
|---|---|
| Positive urine culture | 4 (33.33%) |
| E. coli | 3 (75%) |
| Pseudomonas | 1 (25%) |
| Urine for PCR | 5 (62.5%) |
| Urine for AFB culture | 3 (37.5%) |
| Serum adenosine deaminase (ADA) | 1 (12.5%) |
| MCU | |
| Contracted bladder with reflux | 7 (58.33%) |
| Contracted bladder with no reflux | 5 (41.66%) |
| Cystoscopy | |
| Capacity (<50 mL) | 4 (33.33%) |
| Capacity (50-100 mL) | 8 (66.66%) |
| CT Urography | |
| Cystitis with VUR | 7 (58.33%) |
| Pyelonephritis/pyonephrosis | 2 (16.66%) |
| Others (ureteric stricture, small capacity bladder) | 2 (16.66%) |
| Treatment | |
| 1. Medical treatment | 5 (41.66%) |
| Oral antihistaminic, corticosteroids, and antibiotics (Eosinophilic Cystitis) | 1 |
| BCG withdrawn | 2 |
| Anticholinergics | 1 |
| Intravesical botulinum | 1 |
| 2. Surgical treatment | 8 (75%) |
| Augmentation cystoplasty | 5 |
| Supratrigonal cystectomy with diversion | 1 |
| Early cystectomy with diversion | 2 |
Figure 240 × microscopic image of patient of eosinophilic cystitis who underwent punch biopsy, showing inflammatory infiltrate of eosinophil (red arrow)
Figure 3Cystoscopic image showing feature of radiation cystitis, with multiple hyperemic telangiectatic areas. (white arrow)
Figure 4a, b: CT scan showing gross asymmetric wall thickening of bladder with hydronephrosis
Figure 5Post-operative MCU a patient demonstrating a bladder capacity of 200 mL
Review on the most important causes, diagnosis and management
| Author | Year | Case study | Causative agent | M/c symptom | Investigation | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gupta et al.[ | 2006 | Retrospective study | GUTB | Irritative symptom (70.54%) | Increased ESR (83.81%) | Antitubercular drug |
| Teegavarapu et al.[ | 2005 | Review | Eosinophilic cystitis | Frequency, dysuria, hematuria, and suprapubic pain | Cystoscopy: erythematous, polypoid velvety red lesions and gross mucosal oedema | 1. NSAIDS |
| Huan et al.[ | 2015 | Case report | Malakoplakia | LUTS with asthma | Cystoscopy + biopsy: Lamina propria infiltrated by foamy macrophages- containing Michaelis-Gutmann bodies | 1. Antibiotics (Quinolones + trimethoprim + /-rifampicin) |
| Liu et al.[ | 2019 | Review | Intravesical therapy | Chemical cystiti (35%) with irritative LUTS (M/C) | Microbiological studies)- 48% Tissue biopsy -65.5% Histopathological examination of specimen- 86.3% | 1. Hydrodistension |
| Srirangam et al.[ | 2012 | Case report | Ketamine | LUTS microhematuria | Cystoscopy - ulceration and active bleeding with a significantly reduced functional bladder capacity. | Discontinue medications |
| Rajaganapathy et al.[ | 2013 | Review | Radiation | Dysuria, frequency and urgency | Cystoscopy -Erythema, edema, and telangiectasia, bleeding ulcers, fistulas or fibrosis with reduction in bladder capacity | Intravesical botulinum |
| Ferrara et al.[ | 2018 | Case report | Schistosomiasis | Irritative LUTS with hematuria | Radiological: diffuse thickening of bladder wall with pseudo polypoid lesion | Medical treatment- Praziquantel |