| Literature DB >> 35800425 |
Janyarut Srijumruen1, Sira Vachatimanont2, Usanee Techavijit3, Tawatchai Chaiwatanarat3.
Abstract
Objectives: The normal range of the frequency of antral contractions, similar to other gastric motility parameters, are different depending on the population and the test meal. We, therefore, conducted the analysis to establish the normal ranges for the frequency of antral contractions derived from dynamic antral scintigraphy (DAS) following an Asian-styled solid meal in Thai healthy volunteers.Entities:
Keywords: Antral contractility; Gastrointestinal Motility; Healthy volunteers; Radionuclide imaging
Year: 2022 PMID: 35800425 PMCID: PMC9205843 DOI: 10.22038/AOJNMB.2021.60453.1423
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol ISSN: 2322-5718
Figure 1A rectangular ROI drawn at the most horizontal part of the gastric antrum displayed on composite (a) and dynamic (b) images
Figure 2Image processing. (a) raw data with 3rd degree polynomial curve fitted. (b) ATC after normalization (c). ATC after autocorrelation and (d) result of fast Fourier analysis
Baseline characteristics of eligible subjects
| Demographic data | Total | Male | Female |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Gender; n (%) | 18 (100) | 10 (56) | 8 (44) |
| 2. Age; years (Mean±SD) | 40.67±13.32 | 39.30 ± 11.79 | 42.38±15.69 |
| 3. Weight; kg (Mean±SD) | 60.78±10.59 | 64.45±9.75 | 56.20±10.33 |
| 4. Height; cm (Mean±SD) | 162.56±7.06 | 167.00±5.10 | 157.00±4.90 |
| 5. BMI; kg/m2 (Mean±SD) | 22.99±3.85 | 23.06±3.07 | 22.91±4.89 |
| 6. Smoking | |||
| Non-smoker; n (%) | 13 (72%) | 5 (50%) | 8 (100%) |
| Smoker; n (%) | 4 (22%) | 4 (40%) | - |
| Ex-smoker; n (%) | 1 (6%) | 1 (10%) | - |
| 7. Menstrual status | |||
| Menopause; n (%) | - | - | 1 (13.5%) |
| Follicular phase; n (%) | - | - | 3 (38.5%) |
| Luteal phase; n (%) | - | - | 2 (25%) |
| Unclassified; n (%) | - | - | 2 (25%) |
Figure 3A Bland-Altmann plot showing average and difference between antral frequency from the first and the second analyses
Figure 4Box plots showing antral frequencies, compared between genders (a), menstruation (b) and smoking status (c)
Figure 5Simple linear regression between antral frequencies and ages