| Literature DB >> 35800418 |
Arpit Mitra1, Sangita Lad2, Sudeep Sahu2, Savita Kulkarni1,2,3.
Abstract
Objectives: Bacterial endotoxin test (BET) for detection and quantification of endotoxin in radiopharmaceuticals (RPs), used for therapy or diagnosis, is prerequisite to administration in patients. Out of the two established methods used for this purpose (Kinetic Chromogenic Assay: KCM and Gel Clot Bacterial Endotoxin Test: GC-BET), GC-BET is recommended by pharmacopeias to evaluate the interferences exhibited during the assay due to presence of various ingredients in samples. In the present study, the influence of excess of cations in [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE, used for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT), were studied and a protocol to negate the enhancement observed was developed. Additionally, a protocol for carrying out GC-BET for extremely viscous [131I]I-Lipiodol was standardized.Entities:
Keywords: Iodine-131-Lipiodol; Limulus Amebocyte Lysate Gel-Clot test; Lutetium-177-DOTATATE; Transglutaminase
Year: 2022 PMID: 35800418 PMCID: PMC9205850 DOI: 10.22038/AOJNMB.2021.59607.1416
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol ISSN: 2322-5718
EL, MVD and Sensitivity used in GC-BET assay for various RPs and APIs
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE | <4 | 30 | 0.125 |
| [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE | <4 | 30 | 0.125 |
| [131I]I-Lipiodol | <12 | 400 | 0.03 |
| [177Lu]LuCl3 | |||
| DOTATATE acetate (0.565 µmol) | <4 | 30 | 0.125 |
| Ammonium acetate buffer (0.1 M) | <4 | 30 | 0.125 |
| Gentisic acid (0.26 M) | <4 | 30 | 0.125 |
The detailed protocol for the GC-BET performed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Negative Water Control | 100 | … | … | 100 |
| 2 | Positive Water Control 2λ | 50 | 50 | … | 100 |
| 3 | Negative Product Control† | 50 | … | 50 | 100 |
| 4 | Positive Product Control 2λ† | … | 50 | 50 | 100 |
Test 3 and 4 were also performed initially for stock solution of CaCl2 solution, saline (0.9% sodium chloride) and also for ultrapure water to ensure absence of endotoxin in stock solutions.
*: Done at MVD for [131I]I-Lipiodol and [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE.
†: These tubes were set up for [131I]I-Lipiodol.
‡: First dilution tubes of test sample (MVD/2) were vortexed at 3000 rpm for 8 minutes for [131I]I-Lipiodol
§: 100 µl of excess CaCl2 (60 mM) was incorporated in first dilution tube (MVD/2) of test sample using LRW as diluents for [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE so the 2 mM concentration of CaCl2 was maintained in the final assay. Assay was also performed in same way with excess of Mg2+.
?: For [177Lu]LuCl3, ammonium acetate buffer and gentisic acid, pH of the test samples were adjusted using 0.25 M tris base at first dilution. pH adjustment prior to assay procedure, were not required for DOTATATE acetate.
The detailed protocol for the KCM BET
| Products | MVD | Test Samples (µL) | LRW (µL) |
|---|---|---|---|
| [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE ([177Lu]Lu3+: 0.226 µmol, RCP: 90 to <95%) | 30 | 20 | 580 |
| [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE ([177Lu]Lu3+: 0.226 µmol, RCP: ≥95 to 99%) | 30 | 20 | 580 |
| [177Lu]LuCl3* | 30 | 20 | 580 |
| Ammonium acetate buffer (0.1 M)* | 30 | 20 | 580 |
| DOTATATE acetate (0.565 µmol) | 30 | 20 | 580 |
*: pH of test Samples was adjusted with 0.25 M tris base prior KCM-BET
Results of [131I]I-Lipiodol at MVD in GC-BET
|
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| [131I]I-Lipiodol | ++ | ++ | -- | -- | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
NPC: Negative Product Control, PPC: Positive Product Control, rpm: rotation per minute
++: Firm Gel Clot, --: No Gel Clot
Results observed for GC-BET assay for different RL-RP and and APIs at MVD
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE | -- | -- | -- | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE | ++ | -- | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| [177Lu]LuCl3 | -- | -- | -- | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| DOTATATE acetate | -- | -- | -- | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| Ammonium acetate buffer (0.1 M) | ||||||
| Gentisic acid (0.26 M) | -- | -- | -- | ++ | ++ | ++ |
#Ca2+: 2 mM of Ca2+ (CaCl2 form) in the test sample at final assay.
$Mg2+: 2 mM of Mg2+ (MgCl2 form) in the test sample at final assay.
NPC: Negative Product Control, PPC: Positive Product Control
++: Firm Gel Clot, --: No Gel Clot
Results observed for KCM BET assay for different RL-RP and and APIs at MVD
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE ([177Lu]Lu3+: 0.226 µmol, RCP: 90 to <95%) | 125 | <1.5 | 30 |
| [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE ([177Lu]Lu3+: 0.226 µmol, RCP: ≥95 to 99%) | 118 | <1.5 | 30 |
| [177Lu]LuCl3* | 96 | <1.5 | 30 |
| DOTATATE acetate (0.565 µmol) | 109 | <1.5 | 30 |
| Ammonium acetate buffer (0.1 M)* | 90 | <1.5 | 30 |
*: 5 – 0.05 EU/ml is the sensitivity of KCM – BET
Results observed for GC BET assay performed at different standard endotoxin concentrations in the presence and absence of calcium chloride
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | -- | -- | -- |
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | -- | -- | -- | |
|
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | -- | -- | -- |
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | -- | -- | -- | |
|
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | -- | -- | -- |
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | -- | -- | -- | |
|
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | -- | -- | -- |
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | -- | -- | -- | |
|
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | -- | -- | -- |
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | -- | -- | -- | |
|
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | -- | -- | -- |
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | -- | -- | -- | |
|
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | -- | -- | -- |
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | -- | -- | -- | |
|
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | -- | -- | -- |
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | -- | -- | -- | |
|
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | -- | -- | -- |
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | -- | -- | -- | |
|
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | -- | -- | -- |
|
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | -- | -- | -- | |
A: with CaCl2 , B: without CaCl2 , λ: Sensitivity of lysate
T1, T2 and T3 are triplicates for each different standard endotoxin concentration