Background: We used a dual energy computed tomography (DECT) based scoring system in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and correlated it with functional and hemodynamic parameters. Methods: This was a retrospective study on 78 patients with CTEPH who underwent DECT. First, clot burden score was calculated by assigning a following score: pulmonary trunk-5, each main pulmonary artery-4, each lobar-3, each segmental-2, and subsegmental-1 per lobe; sum total was then calculated. Perfusion defect (PD) score was calculated by assigning 1 point to each segmental PD. Combined score was calculated by adding the clot burden and PD score. All three scores were correlated with clinical and hemodynamic parameters that included New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, 6-minute walk distance (6MWT) in feet, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) [systolic PAP (sPAP), diastolic PAP (dPAP) and mean PAP (mPAP)], pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), right atrial pressure, cardiac output, and cardiac index. Results: Clot burden score, PD score, and combined score all positively correlated with sPAP (0.25, 0.34, 0.34), PVR (0.27, 0.30, 0.34), and mPAP (0.28, 0.31, 0.36). There was no statistically significant correlation of clot burden score, PD score and combined score with 6MWT, % predicted 6MWT, FEV1, FEV1%, FVC, FVC%, DLCO% and NYHA functional class. Conclusions: DECT based scoring in CTEPH is feasible and correlates positively with sPAP, mPAP and PVR. Combined score has the highest magnitude of correlation. 2022 Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. All rights reserved.
Background: We used a dual energy computed tomography (DECT) based scoring system in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and correlated it with functional and hemodynamic parameters. Methods: This was a retrospective study on 78 patients with CTEPH who underwent DECT. First, clot burden score was calculated by assigning a following score: pulmonary trunk-5, each main pulmonary artery-4, each lobar-3, each segmental-2, and subsegmental-1 per lobe; sum total was then calculated. Perfusion defect (PD) score was calculated by assigning 1 point to each segmental PD. Combined score was calculated by adding the clot burden and PD score. All three scores were correlated with clinical and hemodynamic parameters that included New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, 6-minute walk distance (6MWT) in feet, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) [systolic PAP (sPAP), diastolic PAP (dPAP) and mean PAP (mPAP)], pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), right atrial pressure, cardiac output, and cardiac index. Results: Clot burden score, PD score, and combined score all positively correlated with sPAP (0.25, 0.34, 0.34), PVR (0.27, 0.30, 0.34), and mPAP (0.28, 0.31, 0.36). There was no statistically significant correlation of clot burden score, PD score and combined score with 6MWT, % predicted 6MWT, FEV1, FEV1%, FVC, FVC%, DLCO% and NYHA functional class. Conclusions: DECT based scoring in CTEPH is feasible and correlates positively with sPAP, mPAP and PVR. Combined score has the highest magnitude of correlation. 2022 Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. All rights reserved.
Authors: Edward T D Hoey; Saeed Mirsadraee; Joanna Pepke-Zaba; David P Jenkins; Deepa Gopalan; Nicholas J Screaton Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Gérald Simonneau; David Montani; David S Celermajer; Christopher P Denton; Michael A Gatzoulis; Michael Krowka; Paul G Williams; Rogerio Souza Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2019-01-24 Impact factor: 16.671