| Literature DB >> 35800349 |
Beza Tayachew1,2, Heidi Vanden Brink1,3, Yesenia Garcia-Reyes1, Haseeb Rahat1, Angelo D'Alessandro2, Daniel N Frank2, Charles E Robertson2, Lori Silveira4,5, Megan Kelsey1,6, Laura Pyle4,5, Melanie Cree-Green1,6.
Abstract
Background: The gut microbiome is altered in obese adolescents with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and is associated with free testosterone, metabolic markers, and insulin resistance. Combined oral contraceptives (OCP) are a primary treatment for PCOS and decrease testosterone, but the effect on the serum metabolome or gut microbiome in obese adolescents with PCOS is unknown. Objective: Contrast gut microbiome profiles, targeted serum metabolomics, hormone levels, and metabolic measures in adolescents with PCOS and obesity with and without OCP treatment.Entities:
Keywords: POCS; adolescent; combined oral contraceptives; metabolomics; microbial diversity; obesity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35800349 PMCID: PMC9255376 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.887077
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.755
Participant demographic, physical characteristics and laboratory measurements comparing girls with obesity and PCOS with (N = 8) and without (N = 21) oral contraceptive treatment. PCOS untreated had significantly higher hirsutism score, free testosterone, and free androgen index and lower SHBG and platelets. All other variables were similar between groups.
| Variables | PCOS, untreated (N = 21) | PCOS OCP-treated (N = 8) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics and History | |||
| Age (years) | 16 (15.5, 17) | 15.5 (15, 17) | 0.82 |
| Race (Caucasian, Black, Asian %) | 76, 14, 10 | 100, 0, 0 | 0.32 |
| Ethnicity (Hispanic, Non-Hispanic) | 57, 43 | 50, 50 | 0.73 |
| Menarche Age (years) | 11.5 ± 1.3 | 11.9 + 1.4 | 0.54 |
| Physical Characteristics | |||
| Acne | 2 (1, 2) | 1 (0.3, 1.8) | 0.78 |
| Hirsutism (FGS score) |
|
| 0.01 |
| Waist:hip ratio | 0.91 (0.86, 0.95) | 0.92 (0.84, 0.98) | 0.12 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 36.5 (33.0, 39.5) | 32.5 (31.1,39.8) | 0.45 |
| BMI (%ile) | 98.8 (97.5, 99.1) | 97.6 (96.6, 99.1) | 0.29 |
| BMI Z-score | 2.1 (2.0, 2.4) | 2.0 (1.8, 2.4) | 0.29 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 120 (155,125) | 117 (112, 125) | 0.91 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 71 (68, 77) | 71 (67, 76) | 0.99 |
| % body fat by DEXA | 45.4 ± 3.9 | 46.4 ± 4.0 | 0.56 |
| % lean mass by DEXA | 52.0 ± 3.8 | 51.1 ± 3.8 | 0.54 |
| 7 Day Dietary Intake Recall | |||
| Fat intake (%) | 41 (37, 48) | 41 (36, 43) | 0.37 |
| Protein intake (%) | 16 (14, 18) | 15 (13, 16) | 0.59 |
| Carbohydrate intake (%) | 43 (35, 49) | 44 (41, 49) | 0.37 |
| Physical Activity | |||
| Activity from recall survey (METS) | 55.3 ± 8.7 | 51.6 ± 10.2 | 0.34 |
| Accelerometer % Sedentary | 51 ± 14 | 55 ± 7 | 0.47 |
| Accelerometer % Light | 36 ± 10 | 35 ± 4 | 0.75 |
| Accelerometer % Moderate or Vigorous | 7 ± 7 | 6 ± 7 | 0.87 |
| Laboratory Measurements | |||
| Free testosterone (ng/dl) |
|
|
|
| Total testosterone (ng/dl) | 41 (33, 51) | 30 (24, 49) | 0.288 |
| SHBG (mmol/L) |
|
|
|
| Free Androgen Index |
|
|
|
| Estradiol (pg/ml) | 53 (45, 80) | 35 (28, 49) | 0.09 |
| AST(IU/mL) | 50 (38, 79) | 32 (30, 48) | 0.14 |
| ALT (IU/ml) | 35 (30, 46) | 37 (31, 41) | 0.54 |
| WBC (109 cells/L) | 8.5 ± 1.9 | 8.5 ± 2.7 | 0.99 |
| hs-CRP (mg/dl) | 2.4 (1.1, 7.1) | 9.5 (2.9, 12.7) | 0.09 |
| Adiponectin (ng/ml) | 6.4 (4.9, 10.4) | 5.7 (5.1, 8.0) | 0.57 |
| Platelets (108 cells/L) |
|
|
|
| Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 140 (133, 175) | 162 (137, 180) | 0.41 |
| HDL (mg/dl) | 35 (29, 44) | 41 (38, 46) | 0.19 |
| LDL (mg/dl) | 103 (91, 127) | 121 (100, 137) | 0.35 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 112 (105, 150) | 144 (93, 195) | 0.63 |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.6 (5.3, 5.8) | 5.5 (5.3, 5.7) | 0.85 |
| Fasting glucose (mg/dl) | 86 (80, 92) | 88 (83, 93) | 0.57 |
| Fasting insulin (μU/mL) | 23 (19, 42) | 26 (18, 36) | 0.68 |
| Fasting C-peptide (ng/ml) | 2.3 (1.8, 3.4) | 2.6 (2.0, 3.1) | 0.99 |
| 2 h glucose (mg/dl) | 127 ± 26 | 151 ± 38 | 0.08 |
| 2 h insulin (μU/mL) | 185 (86, 649) | 167 (107, 314) | 0.65 |
| HOMA-IR | 5.1 (3.3, 7.9) | 5.0 (4.6, 11.5) | 0.62 |
| Matsuda Index | 1.4 (0.8, 1.9) | 1.6 (0.9, 2.5) | 0.89 |
Values are mean ± standard error of the mean, or median (25%, 75%). BMI, body mass index; METS, metabolic equivalents; SHBG, sex hormone binding globulin; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c. AST, aspartate transferase; ALT, alanine transferase; hsCRP, highly sensitive c-reactive protein. HOMA-IR, homeostatic assessment insulin resistance. Significant values highlighted in bold.
FIGURE 1Bacterial α-Diversity. Measures of α-biodiversity including: (A) Richness (Chao1) (B) Evenness (Shannon H/Hmax), (C) Shannon Diversity (Shannon H). There were no statistical differences in α-diversity between groups. Shannon diversity, Shannon evenness, and richness (Sobs) (measures of α-diversity) were calculated using rarefaction and compared across groups using linear models adjusting for batch effects. Girls with obesity and PCOS with (N = 8) and without (N = 14) oral contraceptive treatment were included.
FIGURE 2(A) Phyla; (B) Genus; (C) Family Microbiome differences between OCP and untreated. Partial Least Square-Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) of bacterial % relative abundance between groups at the (A) Phyla (B) Genus and (C) Family level. Only taxa with > 1% RA are included. For Phyla, principle component 2 explained 15.7% of the total variance; for genus, Principle component 1 explained 8.8% of total variance; for family, Principle Component 1 explained 11.2% of the variance. Girls with obesity and PCOS with (N = 8) and without (N = 14) oral contraceptive treatment were included.
FIGURE 3Partial least-square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) of target Metabolomics by group. (A) PLS-DA of targeted metabolomics including free fatty acids, bile acids, and branched chain amino acids was different between groups, PLS-DA showed discrimination between the two groups across principal component 1, which explained 21.1% of the total metabolic variance across samples (B) Heatmap of top 25 metabolites (C) 6 serum metabolites were different between the groups with unadjusted p-value. Only Tyrosine marked *, remained so with False Discovery Rate adjustment for multiple comparisons. Girls with obesity and PCOS with (N = 8) and without (N = 14) oral contraceptive treatment were included.
Variables from Table 1 were run for unadjusted correlation with α-diversity indices and phyla and family bacterial taxa. All participants including girls with obesity and PCOS with (N = 8) and without (N = 21) oral contraceptive treatment were included. Free testosterone, HOMA-IR, and fatty acids, bile acids, branched chain amino acids were significantly correlated with Evenness, Shannon diversity and Ruminococcaceae. When significant, results are shown with R value, (p-value).**NS = not significant, p-values >0.06.
| Variables* (targeted metabolomics, hormonal and glucose measures) | Evenness (R, | Shannon diversity (R, | Ruminococcaceae (R, | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free testosterone | −0.58 (0.005) | −0.55 (0.008) | ||
| HOMA-IR | −0.43 (0.043) | |||
| Linoleate | −0.51 (0.014) | −0.53 (0.010) | ||
| 7Z-10Z-13Z-16Z-19Z (Pentaenoic acid) | −0.49 (0.020) | −0.51 (0.015) | NS | |
| acyl-C8 L-octanoyl | −0.45 (0.035) | −0.47 (0.026) | NS | |
| Dihomo-g-linolenic | −0.46 (0.029) | −0.50 (0.018) | −0.43 (0.044) | |
| Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) | NS | NS | −0.48 (0.022) | |
| Taurocholate (TCA) | NS | NS | 0.45 (0.036) | |
| Taurolithocholate (TLCA) | NS | NS | 0.44 (0.040) | |
| Taurodeoxycholate (TDCA) | NS | NS | 0.60 (0.003) | |
| Alanine | −0.53 (0.011) | −0.55 (0.008) | −0.52 (0.012) | |
| L-Valine | −0.49 (0.021) | −0.50 (0.016) | NS | |
| L-Isoleucine | −0.41 (0.061) | −0.40 (0.060) | NS | |
| L-Leucine | −0.43 (0.042) | −0.43 (0.043) | NS | |
| Glycine | NS | NS | −0.45 (0.033) | |
| Acyl-C8 L-octanoyl | −0.45 (0.035) | −0.47 (0.026) | NS | |
*Variables from Table 1 were run for correlation with α-diversity indices and phyla and family bacterial taxa (N = 22). When significant, results are shown with R value, (p-value); NS, not significant, p-values >0.06.; ***p-values are unadjusted for multiple comparison.