| Literature DB >> 35800215 |
Jianhua Wang1, Yuhang Liu1, Yongming Zhang1, Bin Liu1, Zhijian Wei2.
Abstract
Muscle atrophy caused by long-term denervation leads to the loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength, resulting in a poor recovery of functional muscles and decreasing quality of life. Increasing differentially expressed microRNAs (DEMs) have been reported to be involved in the pathogenesis of denervated muscle atrophy. However, there is still insufficient evidence to explain the role of miRNAs and their target genes in skeletal muscle atrophy. Therefore, an integrative exploration of the miRNA-mRNA regulatory network in denervated muscle atrophy is necessary. A total of 21 (16 upregulated and 5 downregulated) DEMs were screened out in the GSE81914 dataset. Med1, Myod1, Nfkb1, Rela, and Camta1 were predicted and verified to be significantly upregulated in denervated muscle atrophy, from which 6 key TF-miRNA relationship pairs, including Med1-mir-1949, Med1-mir-146b, Myod1-mir-29b, Nfkb1-mir-21, Rela-mir-21, and Camta1-mir-132, were obtained. 60 target genes were then predicted by submitting candidate DEMs to the miRNet database. GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis showed that target genes of DEMs were mainly enriched in the apoptotic process and PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Through the PPI network construction, key modules and hub genes were obtained and potentially modulated by mir-29b, mir-132, and mir-133a. According to the qRT-PCR results, the expression of COL1A1 and Ctgf is opposite to their related miRNAs in denervated muscle atrophy. In the study, a potential miRNA-mRNA regulatory network was firstly constructed in denervated muscle atrophy, in which the mir-29b-COL1A1 and mir-133a-Ctgf pathways may provide new insights into the pathogenesis and treatment.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35800215 PMCID: PMC9256438 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6042591
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.246
Primer sequences.
| Gene | Forward primer sequence (5′-3′) | Reward primer sequence (5′-3′) |
|---|---|---|
| Col1a1 | GGGTCTAGACATGTTCAGCTTTG | GGCAGTGGCCCCTAAGAG |
| Pten | CATGAGCGAGTTGGTCAAGA | CCATGCTGTGCTGGTTCA |
| Mmp2 | GCACCGTCGCCCATCA | GCACTGCCAACTCTTTGTCTGTT |
| Vegfa | CGA AAC CAT GAA CTT TCT GC | CCT CAG TGG GCA CAC ACT CC |
| Ctgf | CAGGGAGTAAGGGACACGA | ACAGCAGTTAGGAACCCAGAT |
| FOXO3 | GCTAAGCAGGCCTCATCTCA | TTCGGTCAGTTTGAGGGTCT |
| Hnf4a | TGCCAACCTCAACTCATCCAACAG | TCCTCACGCTCCTCCTGAAGAATC |
| Mlxipl | CGACACTCACCCGCCTCTTC | TTGTTCAGCCGAATCTTGTC |
| Med1 | AGGAGAAGCGGCAGGATAAAC | GTACACGTTGACTTCATGTCCTT |
| Nkx2-2 | TCTACGACAGCAGCGACAAC | CTTGGAGCTTGAGTCCTGAG |
| Myod1 | CCCTGTTGTTTGTGGAGACA | CTGTGGGAAAGAGTGGGTGT |
| Nfkb1 | TTCCTGATCCCGACAAGAACTG | CCCCCAGAGACCTCATAGTTGT |
| Rela | CCATCAGGGCAGATCTCAAACC | GCTGCTGAAACTCTGAGTTGTC |
| Nr3c1 | CTTGAGAAACTTACACCTCGATGACC | AGCAGTAGGTAAGGAGATTCTCAACC |
| Camta1 | CTGGGAGATGACCTTCACG | GGACAAGCTCCCCATCACAG |
| Mecp2 | CAGCTCCAACAGGATTCCATGGT | AGGCAGGCAAAGCAGAGACATCA |
| Ep300 | AAAAATAAGAGCAGCCTGAG | AGACCTCTTTATGCTTCTTCC |
| Sox10 | ATCCAGGCCCACTACAAGAGC | ATGTCCACGTTGCCGAAGT |
| Gh1 | CATGCCCTTGTCCAGTCTGT | AATGTAGGCACGCTCGAACT |
| Brd4 | TGAGCAGATATTGCAGTTGGTT | CCTCCCAAATGTCTACAACGC |
| GAPDH | GACATGCCGCCTGGA GAAAC | AGCCCAGGATGCCCTTTAGT |
Figure 1Identification of the candidate DEMs. (a) Heatmap of the candidate DEMs. Hierarchical clustering heatmap of DEMs screened based on |logFC|≥1 and P value <0.05. Color gradient from red to green indicates that the differential gene expression value is from high to low. (b) Volcano plot of DEMs. The X-axis is log2 (fold-change) and Y-axis is -log10 (P value). Red points (fold change >2) indicate upregulated miRNAs and blue points (fold change <-2) indicate downregulated miRNAs. The black points represent genes with no significant difference.
Figure 2Potential transcription factors of DEMs. (a) Potential tf-miRNA regulatory network predicted and constructed by TransmiR. (b) qRT–PCR analysis showed Hnf4a, Nkx2-2, Mlxipl, and Med1 expressions in gastrocnemius muscle from denervation rats compared to controls. Error bars, s.e.m. An unpaired, two-tailed Student's t-test was used for comparisons between the two groups. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
Potential target genes of the DEMs.
| DEMs | Expression | Count | Target genes |
|---|---|---|---|
| mir-132 | Up | 10 | Arhgap32, Capn8, Cyp2e1, Foxo3, Grin2a, Lrrfip1, Mecp2, Mmp9, Pten, Rasa1 |
| mir-133a | Down | 5 | Casp9, Ctgf, Hcn2, Klf15, Slc2a4 |
| mir-138 | Up | 3 | Lypla1, Rhoc, Vim |
| mir-203 | Up | 2 | Trpv4, Vegfa |
| mir-21 | Up | 15 | Capn8, Elavl4, Faslg, Kcnj16, Nqo1, Pdcd4, Pdpn, Peli1, Pten, Rad23, Rela, RGD1565591, Tagln, Tiam1, Tpm1 |
| mir-212 | Up | 4 | Cyp2e1, Foxo3, Pten, Rasa1 |
| mir-221 | Up | 3 | Bcl2l11, Cdkn1b, Cdkn1c |
| mir-222 | Up | 3 | Bcl2l11, Cdkn1b, Cdkn1c |
| mir-223 | Up | 4 | Aqp4, Cntn4, Scn3a, Vim |
| mir-29b | Up | 19 | Cav2, Col12a1, Col16a1, Col18a1, Col1a1, Col3a1, Col4a1, Col4a2, Col5a1, Col5a2, Col5a3, Col7a1, Col8a1, Dnmt3b, Insig1, Itgb1, Mmp2, Stx1a, Vegfa |
| mir-672 | Up | 2 | Fndc1, Tnfsf10 |
Figure 3Potential target genes of DEMs predicted by miRNet.
Figure 4The GO enrichment and KEGG pathway analysis of the target genes. (a)–(c) The top 10 GO enrichment terms of the target genes based on biological processes (BP), cell compositions (CC), and molecular functions (MF). (d) The top 10 KEGG pathways analysis terms of the target genes. The three parameters of gene ratio, gene count, and -log10 (P value) were used to evaluate enrichment items.
Figure 5Construction of PPI and module analysis. (a) The first module and nodes. (b) The enrichment GO term of module 1. (c) The second module and nodes. (d) The enrichment GO term of module 2.
Figure 6Identification and validation of hub gene expression. (a) PPI network of the top 18 hub genes. (b) The mRNA expression of the hub genes was validated by qRT–PCR. Error bars, s.e.m. An unpaired, two-tailed Student's t-test was used for comparisons between the two groups. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001.