| Literature DB >> 35800142 |
Violeta D Jakovljević1, Ivana D Radojević2, Sandra M Grujić2, Aleksandar M Ostojić2.
Abstract
The goal of the current study was to examine the effects of pollutants (White color - CP; Metallic red color - FM; Thinner - CN; Thinner for rinsing paint - MF; Basic color (primer) - FH) originating from the automotive industry on the biofilm growth, matrix protein content, and activity of the hydrolytic enzymes of selected microbial strains in laboratory conditions that mimic the bioreactor conditions. The chosen microorganisms (bacteria, yeasts, and fungi) were isolated from automotive industry wastewater. Pure microbe cultures and their consortia were injected into AMB Media carriers and developed into biofilms. The use of AMB media carriers has been linked to an increase in the active surface area colonized by microorganisms. Afterwards, the carriers were transferred to Erlenmeyer flasks with nutrient media and pollutants at a concentration of 200 μL/mL. The current study found that, depending on the microbial strain, development phase, and chemical structure, the assessed pollutants had an inhibitory or stimulatory influence on the growth of single cultures and their consortia. Statistical analysis found positive correlations between the protein content in the matrix and the biofilm biomass of Rhodotorula mucilaginosa and consortia in CP and FH media, respectively. The proteolytic activity of Candida utilis was very pronounced in media with MF and CN. The best alkaline phosphatase activity (ALP) was achieved in the CN medium of R. mucilaginosa. Acid invertase activity was the highest in the FM and CP media of Escherichia coli and consortia, respectively, whereas the highest alkaline invertase activity was measured in the MF medium of E. coli. A positive correlation was confirmed between ALP and the biofilm biomass of R. mucilaginosa in CP and CN media, as well as between ALP and the biofilm biomass of Penicillium expansum in FM medium. The findings provide novel insights into the extracellular hydrolytic activity of the investigated microbial strains in the presence of auto paints, as well as a good platform for subsequent research into comprehensive biofilm profiling using modern methodologies.Entities:
Keywords: Biofilm; Invertase; Phosphatase; Pollutants; Protease
Year: 2022 PMID: 35800142 PMCID: PMC9253408 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.103347
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.052
The list of tested microorganisms used in the current study.
| Tested microbial strains | Code identification |
|---|---|
| PMFKG-F1 | |
| PMFKG-F8 | |
| PMFKG-F9 | |
| PMFKG-F11 | |
| PMFKG-F14 | |
| all species |
Fig. 1The microbial growth in control (a) and media with tested pollutants: FH (b), CP (c), FM (d), MF (e), and CN (f) determined on the 1st, 7th and 15th days.
Microbial biofilms detected at 24 h (bacteria), 72 h (yeast), and 96 h (fungi) of inoculation in control, FH, MF, CN, FM, and CP media.
Amount of EPS proteins (mg/mL) of microbial cultures measured in media with pollutants.
| Microorganisms | Proteins (mg/mL) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FM | MF | FH | CN | CP | |
| 0.47 ± 0.05 | 0.30 ± 0.05 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.22 ± 0.05 | |
| 0.52 ± 0.15 | 0.56 ± 0.18 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.03 | 0.26 ± 0.05 | |
| 0.22 ± 0.01 | 0.16 ± 0.02 | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 0.15 ± 0.05 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | |
| 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 0 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0 | |
| 0.19 ± 0.03 | 0.17 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.013 ± 0.01 | |
| Consortia | 0.16 ± 0.05 | 0.37 ± 0.06 | 0.33 ± 0.08 | 0.06 ± 0.20 | 0.18 ± 0.05 |
Note: The mean ± standard deviation of a representative experiment (n = 3) is used to express the data.
Hydrolytic enzyme activity (IU/mL) of biofilm matrix measured after 15 days of inoculation in media with pollutants.
| Alkaline protease activity | Acid invertase activity | Alkaline invertase activity | ALP activity (BGP substrate) | ALP activity (pNPP substrate) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH | 0.109 ± 0.240 | 0.004 ± 0.001 | 0 | 0.012 ± 0.003 | 0 |
| MF | 0 | 0 | 0.020 ± 0.005 | 0 | 0.421 ± 0.050 |
| CN | 0.005 ± 0.001 | 0.025 ± 0.002 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FM | 0.052 ± 0.015 | 0.043 ± 0.010 | 0.002 ± 0.001 | 0 | 0.037 ± 0.015 |
| CP | 0.002 ± 0.001 | 0 | 0.007 ± 0.003 | 0 | 0 |
| FH | 0.012 ± 0.003 | 0.005 ± 0.002 | 0 | 0.018 ± 0.009 | 0 |
| MF | 0 | 0 | 0.008 ± 0.002 | 0 | 0.146 ± 0.072 |
| CN | 0 | 0.025 ± 0.005 | 0 | 1.404 ± 0.158 | 0 |
| FM | 0.035 ± 0.010 | 0.012 ± 0.008 | 0 | 0 | 0.146 ± 0.056 |
| CP | 0.003 ± 0.001 | 0 | 0 | 0.012 ± 0.003 | 0 |
| FH | 0.002 ± 0.001 | 0 | 0 | 0.120 ± 0.065 | 0 |
| MF | 0.219 ± 0.076 | 0 | 0.011 ± 0.005 | 0 | 0.220 ± 0.048 |
| CN | 0.167 ± 0.042 | 0 | 0 | 0.006 ± 0.002 | 0 |
| FM | 0 | 0 | 0.005 ± 0.001 | 0 | 0.073 ± 0.032 |
| CP | 0.001 ± 0.000 | 0.007 ± 0.001 | 0.008 ± 0.001 | 0 | 0 |
| FH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MF | 0 | 0.022 ± 0.010 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.108 ± 0.050 | 0 |
| FM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FH | 0.003 ± 0.001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MF | 0 | 0.007 ± 0.002 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CN | 0.001 ± 0.000 | 0 | 0 | 0.006 ± 0.002 | 0 |
| FM | 0 | 0.020 ± 0.005 | 0 | 0.312 ± 0.026 | 0 |
| CP | 0 | 0 | 0.006 ± 0.001 | 0 | 0 |
| Consortia | |||||
| FH | 0.033 ± 0.018 | 0.011 ± 0.002 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MF | 0.002 ± 0.001 | 0 | 0.007 ± 0.002 | 0 | 0.128 ± 0.032 |
| CN | 0.004 ± 0.002 | 0.010 ± 0.001 | 0 | 0.006 ± 0.003 | 0 |
| FM | 0.004 ± 0.001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CP | 0.009 ± 0.005 | 0.043 ± 0.020 | 0.005 ± 0.001 | 0.004 ± 0.001 | 0 |
Note: The mean ± standard deviation of a representative experiment (n = 3) is used to express the data.