| Literature DB >> 35800030 |
Yuanzheng Pi1, Wenzhu Liu1,2, Jiani Wang1, Guanmin Peng1, Dabo Jiang2, Ruike Guo1, Dulin Yin2.
Abstract
With activated carbon as raw material, AC-Ph-SO3H was prepared after oxidation with nitric acid, modification with halogenated benzene and sulfonation with concentrated sulfuric acid. After modified by 10% bromobenzene with toluene as a solvent for 5 h, followed sulfonation with concentrated sulfuric acid at 150°C, the -SO3H content of prepared AC-Ph-SO3H was 0.64 mmol/g. Acid content test, infrared spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy detection proved that the surface of AC-Ph-SO3H was successfully grafted with -SO3H group. When used as a catalyst for the methylation of palmitate acid, the catalytic performance of AC-Ph-SO3H was explored. When the reaction time was 6 h, the amount of catalyst acid accounted for 2.5 wt% of palmitic acid, and the molar ratio of methanol/palmitic acid was 40, the esterification rate of palmitic acid was 95.2% and the yield of methyl palmitate was 94.2%, which was much better than those of its precursors AC, AC-O, and AC-Ph (both about 4.5%). AC-Ph-SO3H exhibited certain stability in the esterification reaction system and the conversion rate of palmitic acid was still above 80% after three reuses.Entities:
Keywords: activated carbon; biodiesel; halogenated benzene; palmitic acid; sulfonic acid catalyst
Year: 2022 PMID: 35800030 PMCID: PMC9253271 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.944398
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.545
Density of -COOH in AC-Ph modified with different halogenated benzene
| Sample | PhX | solvent | Temp. (oC) | -COOH (mmol/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC-O | / | / | / | 0.78 |
| AC-Ph | PhI | Cyclohexane | 80 | 0.62 |
| PhI | Toluene | 110 | 0.28 | |
| PhI | DMSO | 180 | 0.29 | |
| PhBr | Cyclohexane | 80 | 0.63 | |
| PhBr | Toluene | 110 | 0.30 | |
| PhBr | DMSO | 180 | 0.29 | |
| PhCl | Cyclohexane | 80 | 0.65 | |
| PhCl | Toluene | 110 | 0.53 | |
| PhCl | DMSO | 180 | 0.48 |
FIGURE 1Density of -SO3H in AC-Ph-SO3H prepared under different PhBr concentration.
FIGURE 2Density of -SO3H in AC-Ph-SO3H prepared under different PhBr treated time.
FIGURE 3Density of -SO3H of AC-Ph-SO3H under different sulfonation temperature.
Surface -COOH and -SO3H contents of AC-Ph-SO3H and its precursors
| Sample | Density of -SO3H (mmol/g) | Density of -COOH (mmol/g) |
|---|---|---|
| AC | / | 0.03 |
| AC-O | / | 0.78 |
| AC-Ph | / | 0.30 |
|
| 0.03 | 0.28 |
|
| 0.15 | 0.69 |
| AC-Ph-SO3H | 0.64 | 0.54 |
Sulfonation of unoxidized AC.
Sulfonation of AC-O, without bromobenzene treatment.
Stability of AC-Ph-SO3H in different solvents
| Solvent | Temp. (oC) | -SO3H (mmol/g) | Lost (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 h | 20 h | 10 h | 20 h | ||
| Non | / | 0.64 | 0.64 | / | / |
| Cyclohexane | 81 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 4.7 | 9.4 |
| Ethanol | 78 | 0.54 | 0.50 | 15.6 | 21.9 |
| Water | 100 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 23.4 | 25.0 |
| Acetic acid | 118 | 0.30 | 0.25 | 53.1 | 60.9 |
Note: Reaction conditions: 2 g AC-Ph-SO3H, was added into 20 ml solvents and refluxed under refluxed temperature.
FIGURE 4Raman spectrum of AC, AC-O, AC-Ph and AC-Ph-SO3H.
Raman spectrum ID/IG of AC, AC-O, AC-Ph and AC-Ph-SO3H
| Sample | AC | AC-O | AC-Ph | AC-Ph-SO3H |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID/IG | 1.029 | 1.256 | 1.191 | 1.174 |
FIGURE 5FT-IR spectrum of AC AC-O AC-Ph and AC-Ph-SO3H.
FIGURE 6N2 adsorption‑desorption isotherms and pore size distribution for AC-Ph-SO3H and its precursors.
BET surface area of AC-N of AC-Ph-SO3H and its precursors.
| Samples | BET surface area (m2/g) | Pore volume (cm3/g) | Pore size (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| AC | 1,286 | 0.77 | 2.4 |
| AC-O | 614 | 0.38 | 2.5 |
| AC-Ph | 528 | 0.31 | 2.5 |
| AC-Ph-SO3H | 472 | 0.30 | 2.5 |
FIGURE 7Effect of reaction conditions on methylation of palmitic acid.
FIGURE 8Conversion of palmitic acid catalyzed by AC-Ph-SO3H and its precursors.
FIGURE 9Recycle performance of AC-Ph-SO3H on methylation of palmitic acid.
Comparison of catalytic performance with the reported carbon-based solid acids.
| Entry | Solid acid catalyst | Density of -SO3H (mmol/g) | Catalyst amount (wt%) | Acid | Time (h) | Conv. in the first Cycle (%) | Reaction cycle | Conv. in the last cycle (%) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AC-Ph-SO3H | 0.64 | 2.5 | Palmitate acid | 6 | 95.2 | 3 | 81.7/N | This study |
| 2 | MLC-S | 0.91 | 5 | Oleic acid | 6 | 92.3 | 5 | 72.9/N |
|
| 3 | CS-SAC | 1.48 | 5 | Oleic acid | 24 | 93 | 3 | 56/N |
|
| 4 | CS-SAC | 0.85 | 7.5 | Oleic acid | 24 | 76 | 5 | 78/Y |
|
| 5 | AC108 | 0.93 | 10 | Oleic acid | 6 | 89 | 5 | 89/N |
|
| 6 | Heterogeneous acid catalyst synthesized from bamboo-AC | 1.17 | 12 | Oleic acid | 3 | 96 | 5 | 28/N; 94/Y |
|
| 7 | SO3H-KSC | — | 2 | palm fatty acid | 1.5 | 98.7 | 6 | 60/N |
|
| 8 | Bamboo-SO3H | — | 4 | palm fatty acid | 1 | 95.8 | 4 | 71/N |
|
| 9 | HTC-S | — | 3 | palm fatty acid | 2 | 92 | 3 | 82/N |
|
| 10 | ASHC-SO3H | 1.4 | 10 | Oleic acid | 3 | 96.4 | 4 | 55.1/N; 95.4/Y |
|
Note: N represents no regeneration; Y represents regeneration.