Literature DB >> 35800028

Identification of nuc nuclease and sea enterotoxin genes in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from nasal mucosa of burn hospital staff: a cross-sectional study.

R Karimzadeh1, R Karimzadeh Ghassab2.   

Abstract

Background: Staphylococcus aureus is one of the main causes of nosocomial infections. The hospital staff as carriers of Staphylococcus aureus have an important role in spreading it among patients. This study aimed to isolate and identify the sea and nuc genes that encode enterotoxin in Staphylococcus aureus isolates, isolated from the Nasal mucosa of staff in Sari Burn hospital by PCR method.
Methods: A gene nasal mucosa of Sari Burn hospital staff. In this cross-sectional study, a nasal swab of 40 staff of Burn hospital of Sari was collected and isolated. The S. aureus was detected by biochemical tests such as Gram stain, catalase, and coagulase. Then nuc and sea genes were identified after the extraction of DNA, by PCR technique and gel electrophoresis with a specific primer.
Results: From the 40 strains obtained from nasal carriers, 20 S. aureus strains were isolated, and all of them included the nuc gene, while 6 samples included the sea gene. Given that every 20 samples had the nuc gene, therefore this gene is a strong marker for S. aureus. Also, the presence of sea genes in some samples suggested the presence of enterotoxin A in hospital staff as a healthy carrier. Conclusions: PCR techniques can be used to detect the genes encoding enterotoxins in S. aureus. Given that hospital staff can be carriers of Staphylococcus aureus and spread nosocomial infections, therefore identification of the carriers to prevent the spread of infection is essential.
© 2022 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hospital staff; Nuc nuclease gene; PCR; Sea enterotoxin; Staphylococcus aureus

Year:  2022        PMID: 35800028      PMCID: PMC9253491          DOI: 10.1016/j.nmni.2022.100992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Microbes New Infect        ISSN: 2052-2975


Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is an opportunistic pathogen that produces numerous exotoxins and is the most common cause of infection in hospitals after Pseudomonas aeruginosa [1]. Various studies show that 15%–80% of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from different sources can produce enterotoxin [[1], [2], [3]]. Among staphylococcal enterotoxins, the sea (enterotoxin A) type is more resistant to heat and gastrointestinal proteolytic enzymes such as pepsin and trypsin [4]. The nuc gene acts as a marker and also the presence of heat resistant nuclease gene (nuc) is strongly associated with the production of enterotoxin and it can be considered an indicator of infection with enterotoxin producer Staphylococcus aureus [5]. There are several methods for detecting toxins in this bacterium, including latex agglutination, ELISA immunochromatography, latex immunoassay, and magnetic immunoassay. In all these methods, it is necessary to provide conditions for the expression of the staphylococcal enterotoxin gene to identify these toxins. Molecular detection methods are also used to identify staphylococcal enterotoxin genes that not only do not require these conditions but are also able to identify staphylococci that have secreted low levels of the toxin, which cannot be detected by immunological methods [6]. PCR can detect the susceptibility of enterotoxin-producing strains, especially when enterotoxin genes are not expressed due to different conditions. In these cases, it is important to search for Staphylococcus aureus strains containing the classic enterotoxin genes SEA-SEE; Because these enterotoxins in very small amounts can also cause severe food poisoning. For this reason, many researchers today use this method to identify strains of Staphylococcus aureus that produce enterotoxins [7]. Nosocomial infections are secondary infections that a patient acquires during hospitalization. One of the most common bacteria causing nosocomial infections is Staphylococcus aureus, which due to various virulence factors can play an important role in the transmission of seemingly healthy carriers to patients in various departments, including burns and intensive care units [8]. According to the colonization ability of S. aureus on the human mucosal membrane, a wide range of hospital infections are associated with this microorganism [9]. S. aureus is defined as the second reason for nosocomial infections [10]. Hospital staff nasal carriers are considered the main source of nosocomial infections in patients [11]. Due to the importance of Staphylococcus aureus strains in nosocomial infections and the role of enterotoxins as superantigens in various diseases, the present study aimed to isolate and identify the sea and nuc genes that encode enterotoxin in Staphylococcus aureus isolates, isolated from the Nasal mucosa of staff in Sari burn hospital by PCR method.

Materials and methods

In this descriptive cross-sectional study 40 samples were collected from the nasal mucosa of Sari Burn hospital staff by a simple sampling method, and cultured on the nutrient agar medium (Merck, Germany). In the next step, colonies suspected of Staphylococcus aureus were tested using gram staining, catalase, oxidase, and coagulase tests. Colonies suspected of Staphylococcus aureus were cultured in mannitol salt agar medium (Merck, Germany). After culturing the bacteria in the mannitol salt agar medium, after 24 hours of culturing the bacteria, a colony loop was inoculated into the nutrient broth medium (Merck, Germany). After 24 hours of incubation at 37 ° C, glycerol was added to the mixture of bacteria and broth medium in a ratio of 70 to 30. The resulting suspension was transferred to the Eppendorf and stored at -80 ° C.

DNA extraction

DNA extraction was done with DNA extraction Kit (CinnaGene Co., Iran). 1.5 ml of microbial suspensions were centrifuged at 4500 rpm for 4 min. 100 μl of the precipitant was mixed with 400 μl of the lysis solution and vortexed for 15 to 20 seconds. In the next step, 300 μl of the precipitating solution was added to the mixture and mixed for 3 to 5 s, and placed at 20 ° C for 20 min. It was then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min and gently emptied by inverting the tube and placing it on paper for 2 to 3 s. One ml of wash buffer was added to the resulting precipitate and vortexed for 3–5 s. It was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 min, then the wash buffer was completely evacuated and placed at 65 ° C for 5 min to dry. The precipitate was completely dissolved in 30 μl of the solvent buffer by gentle shaking and placing at 65 ° C for 5 min. The insoluble material was centrifuged at 12,000 RPM for 30 s. The supernatant contains pure DNA.

Identification of sea and nuc nuclease genes by PCR

In the PCR of the sea and nuc nuclease genes, their specific primers were used after blasting in NCBI to ensure their specificity. These primers were provided by Pishgam Company, Iran. Table 1 lists the specifications for the primers used. The amount and volume of materials required for the PCR and temperature program of the Thermal cycler device (BIO-RAD, USA) are mentioned in Table 2.
Table 1

The specifications for the primers

NameSequence (5-3)Amplitude size
Nuc FGCGATTGATGGTGATACGGTT279
Nuc RAGCCAAGCCTTGACGAACTAAAGC279
Sea FGGAGTTGGATCTTCAAGCAAGAC86
Sea RCCCTCTGAACCTTCCCATCAAA86
Staphylococcus aureus FAGTTTGATCCTGGCTC500
Staphylococcus aureus RCCTACGTATTACCGCGGC500
Table 2

Thermal cycling device temperature program, and the amount and concentration of materials required for PCR

Cycles
Steps
Temperature
Time
Materials
Staphylococcus aureusMaterialsAmounts
First step: 1 cycleDenaturation944 min10X buffer solution2.5 ml
Second step: 35 cyclesDenaturation9545 sNTPs (10 mM)0.5 ml
Annealing571 min
Extension721 min
Third step: 1 cycleExtension7210 minMagnesium chloride (50 mM)0.75 ml
sea geneForward primer1
First step: 1 cycleDenaturation955 minReverse Primer1
Second step: 35 cyclesDenaturation9450 sTemplate5
Annealing59.540 s
Extension7250 s
Third step: 1 cycleExtension725 minDNA polymerase0.2 ml
nuc geneDouble-distilled water14.05 ml
First step: 1 cycleDenaturation955 minTotal volume25 ml
Second step: 37 cyclesDenaturation941 min
Annealing5540 s
Extension721.5 min
Third step: 1 cycleExtension721 min
The specifications for the primers Thermal cycling device temperature program, and the amount and concentration of materials required for PCR

Electrophoresis of PCR products

PCR products were electrophoresed using 1 % agarose gel (Merck, Germany). A mixture of 1 λ DNA loading Dye and 5 λ PCR product was loaded in the gel. Electrophoresis was performed in voltage from 120 to 90 v.

Statistical analysis

SPSS v19 (SPSS Inc. Released 2009. PASW Statistics for Windows, Version 18.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc.) was used to analyze the data. The frequency of genes is reported as a percentage frequency.

Results

The results of biochemical tests showed that 20 out of 40 samples were positive for Staphylococcus aureus. The results of the PCR tests showed that all 20 positive samples had nuc nuclease genes and 6 (30%) of 20 Staphylococcus aureus positive samples had sea genes. Fig. 1 shows the results of PCR product electrophoresis.
Fig. 1

Electrophoresis of PCR products. A) all samples (1–7) were positive for Staphylococcus aureus, M: Marker; B) All samples were positive for nuc gene; C) Sample 3 was positive for sea gene.

Electrophoresis of PCR products. A) all samples (1–7) were positive for Staphylococcus aureus, M: Marker; B) All samples were positive for nuc gene; C) Sample 3 was positive for sea gene.

Discussion

Because of the significance of Staphylococcus aureus strains in nosocomial infections and the role of enterotoxins as superantigens in various diseases, in the present study we evaluated the sea and nuc genes that encode enterotoxin in Staphylococcus aureus isolates, isolated from Nasal mucosa of staff in Sari burn hospital by PCR method. According to the results, all 20 positive samples had nuc nuclease genes, and 6 (30%) of 20 Staphylococcus aureus positive samples had sea genes. In a study by Asgarpoor et al. among the 136 nasal swab samples, 46 (33.8%) were positive for S. aureus, and from 46 isolates, the sea, seb, and sec genes were found in 11 (23.9%), 6 (13%) and 5 (10.8%) isolates, respectively [12]. In the Rall et al. study 82 nasal and hand, swabs were evaluated in food handlers and found that the most common gene was the sea (35.4%), followed by seh and sej (29.2%) [11]. Amini et al. evaluated the Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin genes using multiplex PCR in 60 clinical samples and showed that 50% of Staphylococcus aureus samples contained the enterotoxin gene. The most frequent gene was the sea (30%) and sed (10%), see (3.8%), and sec respectively [13]. Baz et al., evaluated the prevalence of five staphylococcal enterotoxin encoding genes including sea, seb, sec, sed, and see in isolates from clinical specimens collected from patients admitted to Assiut hospital in Egypt, and using the PCR method found that most isolates (39.1%) were related to enterotoxin A genes [14]. In da Silva et al. work, out of 58 Staphylococcus spp. 29 (50%) were positive for one or more enterotoxin genes, and the main genes were seg and sei (29.3%) [15]. In a study by Udo et al. in Kuwait, samples of nasal swabs, feces, and hands of 250 restaurant employees were evaluated to detect staphylococcal enterotoxin genes. From 200 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from people working in restaurants, the frequency of sea, seb, and sec genes were reported to be 11%, 12.5%, and 23%, respectively [16]. Avila-Novoa et al. evaluated the prevalence of the toxin-encoding gene in S. aureus isolates from food contact surfaces. They demonstrated that 35.7% of the S. aureus isolates had at least one enterotoxin gene. In addition, 8 3.3% of S. aureus isolates were positive for amplification of the nuc gene [17]. Peck et al.'s study in Korea showed that the sea gene was the most abundant among enterotoxin genes and out of 95 strains of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from the nose of individuals, 47.4% carried this gene [18]. In the study of Saadati et al., from 95 strains of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from the noses of carriers, the frequency of sea, seb, and sec genes were 25.3%, 15.8%, and 9.5%, respectively [19]. Mohammad et al. assessed the prevalence of five s. aureus enterotoxin encoding genes in isolates from different clinical and environmental sources in hospitals and reported that 66% of enterotoxin gene was sea gene followed by seb (38%), sec (23%), see (19%) and seg (5%) [20]. Diab et al. in a study on 680 milk samples and 43 human hand swabs and 43 human nasal swabs reported that 21.6% of milk samples, 44.2% of the hand swaps, and 32.6% of the nasal swaps were positive for S. aureus. Enterotoxin profile genes were found in 64.7% of the milk samples, 63.2% of the hand samples, and 64.3% of the nasal samples. Sea was the most prevalent gene in all sample types [21]. In Goudarzi et al. study, Among 100 isolates from nasal and clinical sources from Khorramabad hospitals, 35% present sea gene and 8% seb gene [22]. Due to differences in sample size, geographical location, the race of individuals, and level of personal and general health, the frequency patterns of Staphylococcus aureus vectors are different. It seems that Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated in the above studies have different enterotoxinizing power and this important issue is also effective in increasing or decreasing the pathogenicity of this bacterium. It can be said that the location of bacterial colonization can affect the frequency of enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus. Due to the importance of the pathogenicity of Staphylococcus bacteria and its role in nosocomial infections in this study, it was found that hospital staff can be considered a source of the spread of infection in the hospital. The identification of enterotoxin A itself acknowledges the important role of these toxins in the development of secondary infections in patients. The high prevalence of the gene encoding this toxin, as well as the expression of this gene in isolates studied in hospitals, can be a warning and a serious threat to public health. Therefore, using the PCR method, the foci of danger can be identified quickly and possible poisoning can be prevented. Controlling the spread of such microorganisms is very important. It is very necessary for the health care system of any society to correctly identify the important and common pathogens in the hospital. Regional studies aimed at obtaining information about the species and type of Staphylococcus as well as their resistance can provide physicians with the right solutions in choosing the appropriate treatment guidelines. It is better to collect data from other hospitals and other cities as well. Other Staphylococcus aureus genes should be evaluated as well. Various physicochemical factors that affect the growth and production of Staphylococcus aureus toxin have been extensively studied. However, the effect of these physicochemical factors on the genes responsible for the pathogenicity of this bacterium should be studied.

Ethics approval

The study is performed according to Helsinki's principles of ethics. The ethics committee of Islamic Azad University, Ayatollah Amoli Branch approved the study. All participants signed written consent.

CRediT author statement

Roxana Karimzadeh: Conceptualization, Methodology, Sample collection, Visualization, Investigation and performing the tests; Romina Karimzadeh Ghassab: Study design, Data collection and analysis, performing the laboratory tests, Writing- Original draft preparation.

Conflicts of interest

There is no conflict of interest for the present study.
  15 in total

1.  A superantigen bioassay to detect staphylococcal enterotoxin A.

Authors:  Timothy Hawryluk; Irvin Hirshfield
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.077

2.  Detection of genes for enterotoxins, exfoliative toxins, and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 in Staphylococcus aureus by the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  W M Johnson; S D Tyler; E P Ewan; F E Ashton; D R Pollard; K R Rozee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Authors:  A Conde
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-12-31       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Authors:  E Tacconelli; M Tumbarello; R Cauda
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-12-31       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Detection of Staphylococcus aureus by polymerase chain reaction amplification of the nuc gene.

Authors:  O G Brakstad; K Aasbakk; J A Maeland
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Staphylococcal enterotoxins.

Authors:  Irina V Pinchuk; Ellen J Beswick; Victor E Reyes
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 4.546

7.  Detection of genes involved in biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus isolates.

Authors:  Fahimeh Nourbakhsh; Amirmorteza Ebrahimzadeh Namvar
Journal:  GMS Hyg Infect Control       Date:  2016-03-22

8.  The prevalence of antimicrobial resistance and carriage of virulence genes in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from food handlers in Kuwait City restaurants.

Authors:  Edet E Udo; Siham Al-Mufti; M John Albert
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-06-16

9.  Detection of enterotoxin genes of Staphylococcus SP isolated from nasal cavities and hands of food handlers.

Authors:  V L M Rall; J M Sforcin; V C M Augustini; M T Watanabe; A Fernandes; R Rall; M G Silva; J P Araújo
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.476

10.  Nosocomial Infections: Multicenter surveillance of antimicrobial resistance profile of Staphylococcus aureus and Gram negative rods isolated from blood and other sterile body fluids in Iran.

Authors:  Bahman Poorabbas; Jalal Mardaneh; Zahra Rezaei; Mehdi Kalani; Gholamreza Pouladfar; Mohammad Hasan Alami; Jafar Soltani; Ahmad Shamsi-Zadeh; Shahram Abdoli-Oskooi; Mohammed Jafar Saffar; Abdolvahab Alborzi
Journal:  Iran J Microbiol       Date:  2015-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.