| Literature DB >> 35800013 |
Yu Zhou1, Bin Chen1, Yiqiang Xiong1, Xiangdi Yu2.
Abstract
Background: In the current study, we assessed the effect of the ultrasound-guided internal branch of the upper laryngeal nerve (USG-guided iSLN) block combined with general anesthesia on perioperative sore throat (POST), cough, hoarseness of voice, intraoperative hemodynamic changes, and the quality of early recovery for the patients undergoing suspension laryngoscopy vocal cord polypectomy (SLVCP).Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35800013 PMCID: PMC9256407 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1594829
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Figure 1Patient recruitment, randomization, and follow-up in the trial.
Figure 2The figure shows ultrasound images. The red line in (a) shows the area of the thyrohyoid membrane, and the red circle in (a) shows the area of the internal branch of the superior laryngeal nerve and the superior laryngeal artery. The arrow in (b) shows the puncture needle.
Scoring system for severity of cough, sore throat, and hoarseness.
| Score |
|---|
|
|
| Grade 0: no cough |
| Grade 1: light or single cough |
| Grade 2: more than one episode of unsustained (65 s) coughing |
| Grade 3: sustained (65 s) and repetitive cough with the left head |
|
|
|
|
| Grade 0: no sore throat |
| Grade 1: mild (complained of sore throat only upon inquiry) |
| Grade 2: moderate (complained of sore throat on his/her own) |
| Grade 3: severe (severe pain associated with a marked change in voice) |
|
|
|
|
| Grade 0: none |
| Grade 1: noted by the patient |
| Grade 2: obvious to the observer |
| Grade 3: aphonia |
Characteristics and surgical details of the study population.
| Characteristics | Group C | Group S |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 45.73 ± 12.19 | 45.60 ± 12.16 | 0.964 |
| Gender (M/F) | 19/21 | 16/24 | 0.499 |
| Height (cm) | 163.73 ± 7.65 | 161.00 ± 8.75 | 0.142 |
| Weight (kg) | 63.43 ± 12.51 | 61.10 ± 10.95 | 0.379 |
| ASA status (I/II) | 0/40 | 0/40 | |
| Hypertension (%) | 3 (7.5) | 3 (7.5) | 1.000 |
| Duration of surgery (min) | 19.20 ± 11.42 | 18.98 ± 10.66 | 0.928 |
| Postoperative silence time (min) | 65.25 ± 70.97 | 59.70 ± 63.70 | 0.714 |
| Hospital stay (days) | 4.13 ± 1.44 | 4.08 ± 1.33 | 0.872 |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Sufentanil (ug) | 23.63 ± 5.77 | 23.50 ± 6.91 | 0.930 |
| Remifentanil (mg) | 0.05 ± 0.09 | 0.04 ± 0.09 | 0.592 |
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD.
Comparison of the QoR-9 scores (x ± s) of patients in the two groups.
| Group C | Group S |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 11.38 ± 2.47 | 13.05 ± 1.80 | 0.001∗∗ |
|
| 15.10 ± 1.61 | 16.75 ± 1.50 | 0.000 |
=P < 0.01. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD.
Incidence of severe cough (grades 2 and 3).
| Group C | Group S |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Just before extubation(bucking) | 19 (47.5%) | 9 (22.5%) | 0.016 |
|
| |||
| Postextubation | |||
| 10 min | 11 (27.5%) | 5 (12.5%) | 0.028 |
| 1 h | 5 (12.5%) | 1 (2.5%) | 0.054 |
| 4 h | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0.062 |
=P < 0.05. Data are expressed as the number (% of total).
Incidence of severe postoperative sore throat (POST) (grades 2 and 3).
| Group C | Group S |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30 min | 23 (57.5%) | 6 (15%) | ≤0.001∗∗ |
| 2 h | 14 (35%) | 1 (2.5%) | ≤0.001∗∗ |
| 4 h | 7 (17.5%) | 0 (0%) | ≤0.001∗∗ |
| 24 h | 2 (5%) | 0 (0%) | ≤0.001∗∗ |
=P < 0.01. Data are expressed as number (% of total).
Incidence and severity of postoperative hoarseness of voice.
| Group C | Group S |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 2 | Grade 3 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 | ||
| 30 min | 24 (60%) | 16 (40%) | 15 (37.5%) | 25 (62.5%) | 0.024 |
| 2 h | 22 (55%) | 13 (32.5%) | 20 (50%) | 16 (40%) | 0.041 |
| 4 h | 17 (42.5%) | 11 (27.5%) | 17 (42.5%) | 10 (25%) | 0.021 |
| 24 h | 11 (27.5%) | 7 (17.5%) | 15 (37.5%) | 2 (5%) | ≤0.001∗∗ |
=P < 0.05; =P < 0.01. Data are expressed as number (% of total).
Figure 3Mean arterial pressure (MAP) comparison of two groups at different time points. =P < 0.05 vs. group C.
Figure 4Heart rate (HR) of two groups at different time points. =P < 0.05 vs. group C.
MAP comparison of two groups at different time points.
| Group C | Group S |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | 98.58 ± 14.63 | 98.13 ± 12.45 | 0.883 |
|
| 98.73 ± 16.39 | 88.93 ± 17.98 | 0.013 |
|
| 94.43 ± 18.89 | 85.28 ± 14.54 | 0.017 |
|
| 101.03 ± 14.99 | 87.75 ± 12.32 | ≤0.001 |
|
| 92.80 ± 13.23 | 84.70 ± 11.31 | 0.004 |
=P < 0.05; =P < 0.01. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
HR comparison of two groups at different time points.
| Group C | Group S |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 76.45 ± 13.46 | 75.35 ± 12.73 | 0.708 |
|
| 84.75 ± 17.04 | 74.28 ± 13.54 | 0.003∗∗ |
|
| 71.15 ± 12.69 | 67.78 ± 10.48 | 0.042 |
|
| 80.48 ± 17.12 | 72.53 ± 12.42 | 0.020 |
|
| 75.53 ± 13.80 | 70.20 ± 9.66 | 0.049 |
=P < 0.05; =P < 0.01. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD.