| Literature DB >> 35799838 |
Gustavo Antonio Ramírez1,2, Jitendra Keshri1, Isabella Vahrson1, Arkadiy I Garber3, Mark E Berrang4, Nelson A Cox4, Fernando González-Cerón5,6, Samuel E Aggrey6, Brian B Oakley1.
Abstract
In chickens, early life exposure to environmental microbes has long-lasting impacts on gastrointestinal (GI) microbiome development and host health and growth, via mechanisms that remain uncharacterized. In this study, we demonstrated that administrating a fecal microbiome transplant (FMT) from adults to day-of-hatch chicks results in significantly higher body mass of birds and decreased residual feed intake (RFI), implying enhanced feed efficiency, at 6 weeks of age. To assess the potential mechanisms through which FMT affects adult bird phenotype, we combined 16 S rRNA gene amplification, metagenomic, and comparative genomic approaches to survey the composition and predicted activities of the resident microbiome of various GI tract segments. Early life FMT exposure had a long-lasting significant effect on the microbial community composition and function of the ceca but not on other GI segments. Within the ceca of 6-week-old FMT birds, hydrogenotrophic microbial lineages and genes were most differentially enriched. The results suggest that thermodynamic regulation in the cecum, in this case via hydrogenotrophic methanogenic and sulfur-cycling lineages, potentially serving as hydrogen sinks, may enhance fermentative efficiency and dietary energy harvest capacity. Our study provides a specific mechanism of action through which early-life microbiome transplants modulate market-relevant phenotypes in poultry and, thereby, may represent a significant advance toward microbiome-focused sustainable agriculture.Entities:
Keywords: agriculture; archaea; hydrogen; metagenome; methanogens; microbiome; microbiome transplant; poultry
Year: 2022 PMID: 35799838 PMCID: PMC9255636 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.904698
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Figure 1Phenotypes of FMT-inoculated vs. uninoculated control chickens. (A) Average body weight for inoculated and uninoculated male and female bird groups over a 6-week period. Chicks received a single inoculum at day of hatch and were reared in identical conditions as described in the Methods section. Groups with letter M and F refer to male and female chicks. (B) Residual feed index (RFI, actual feed intake relative to expected; lower values represent increased efficiency) for each experimental group. Black horizontal bars depict the mean of all observations and blue horizontal bars depict the mean for birds sampled for metagenomic sequencing. Differences of means were significant by Kruskal-Wallis or student's t-test as indicated on the figure.
Figure 2Cecal microbial community structure based on (A) 16S rRNA gene OTU frequencies and (B) metagenomic functional gene profiles. High and low RFI bird lines depicted as circles and triangles, respectively. Color depicts the inoculation state of the bird: coral = controls (not inoculated) and teal = inoculated. All inoculated samples are also labeled with the genetic line (L: low RFI and H: high RFI) of the FMT donor and recipient, respectively. For both 16 S rRNA-based microbial community structure and for functional profiles, differences between inoculated vs. uninoculated groups were significant (p < 0.01) as determined by Benjamini-Hochberg corrected PERMANOVA analysis as further described in the Supplemental Materials.
Figure 3Microbial community composition and relative abundance of taxa with significantly different relative abundances between inoculated and uninoculated groups. (A) Phylogenetic assignment of all contigs assembled from FMT metagenomes. (B) Phylogenetic assignment of all contigs assembled from control metagenomes. (C) Differentially enriched lineages in controls and FMT recipients. (D) Percent abundance of each significantly differentially abundant lineage in FMT inoculated and uninoculated controls.
Figure 4Predicted completion of KEGG metabolism modules for (A) all cecal metagenomic assemblies. (B) Predicted metabolism modules from (A) with significant (student t-test, p-value < 0.01) differences between FMT inoculated birds and controls.
Figure 5Hydrogenase gene survey. (A) pHMM-based hydrogenase survey of all cecal metagenomes. Circle size and color reflect the number of detected gene homologs per hydrogenase category. (B) Phylogenetic assignment and predicted function for hydrogenase gene homolog categories from FMT inoculated and control cecal metagenomes.
Figure 6Phylogenomic tree depicting the closest phylogenetic relatives of MAG Arch1. Side panel depicts percent completion prediction for various metabolism modules associated with fermentative and methanogenic activity. The schematics to the right depict the animal host source of each genome in the tree.