Liang Li1, Peipei Cheng2, Jiwei Zhang3, Guang Wang4, Tiemin Hu5, Fan Sun6. 1. Liang Li, Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College, Chengde 067000, Hebei Province, P.R. China. 2. Peipei Cheng Department of Pediatrics, The Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College, Chengde 067000, Hebei Province, P.R. China. 3. Jiwei Zhang, Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College, Chengde 067000, Hebei Province, P.R. China. 4. Guang Wang, Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College, Chengde 067000, Hebei Province, P.R. China. 5. Tiemin Hu, Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College, Chengde 067000, Hebei Province, P.R. China. 6. Fan Sun, Department is Neurology. The Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College, Chengde 067000, Hebei Province, P.R. China.
Acute ischemic stroke is a common cerebrovascular disease with high mortality and disability rates. About 75.0% of the surviving patients have varying degrees of disability, which seriously affects their quality of life.1,2 At present, intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy are mostly used to treat acute ischemic stroke. Although intravenous thrombolysis has good curative effect and can effectively recanalize the occluded vessels, it has extremely strict requirements for the time window. The rate of intravenous thrombolysis in China is only 1.6% ~ 1.9%. Even if intravenous thrombolysis is successfully performed, the disability rate within 90 days is still as high as 60.0% ~ 80.0%.3Mechanical thrombectomy can directly remove the thrombus at the occluded vessel, successfully recanalize the occluded vessel and improve the prognosis of patients. Studies show that in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke, compared with simple intravenous thrombolysis and conservative medical treatment, mechanical thrombectomy may result in 66.0%~88.0% recanalization rate of occluded vessels, and effectively reduce the disability rate of this disease.4 Acute ischemic stroke is characterized by acute onset and the treatment time window is short. Even if the treatment time window can be prolonged by six to eight hours after mechanical thrombectomy, the time from onset to femoral artery puncture will be delayed by one minute, which may cause a significant loss of thrombectomy benefits and increase the degree of disability in patients after the treatment.5 In recent years, treatment protocols for acute ischemic stroke have been continuously improved, leading to the improvement of the treatment success rate to a certain extent. However, in the actual clinical treatment process, there is marked variability in the clinical benefits for different patients receiving mechanical thrombectomy. It is very important, therefore, to evaluate the treatment of acute ischemic stroke by mechanical thrombectomy. A comprehensive analysis of prognostic factors can provide a reliable basis for the selection of treatment schemes and for evaluation of prognosis.6 In recent years, our hospital has mostly selected mechanical thrombectomy to treat acute ischemic stroke.The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of mechanical thrombectomy in promoting recanalization of occluded vessels in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke, and the impact of ASPECT score and other factors on the prognosis of patients.
METHODS
Medical records of patients with acute ischemic stroke treated in our hospital from April 2020 to April 2021 were selected. Out of 65 patients, 35 were males and 30 were females.
Inclusion criteria:
Meet the diagnostic criteria in the guidelines for early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke7 issued by the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association in 2018;The modified Rankin Scale (MRS) score before onset was≤1;Onset time<24 hour;Complete clinical data available;Patients aware of the study and cooperate with informed consent.
Exclusion criteria:
Bleeding or bleeding tendency;Severe organ dysfunction or failure;Other intracranial diseases;There was uncontrollable hypertension before treatment;Incomplete medical records.This study has been approved by the medical ethics committee of our college (approval number: CYFYLL2021103, date: 2018-Nov-13).For the mechanical thrombectomy, patients were in the supine position, ECG monitoring, disinfection, towel laying and local anesthesia were carried out. 18G puncture was carried out for the left or right femoral artery by Seldinger wire technique, and 6F arterial sheath (11 cm) was inserted through guide wire. Cerebral angiography was done through 5F single curved catheter to evaluate the specific situation of occluded vessels. Under the guidance of Synchro-14 micro guide wire, angiography was performed on the distal end through Rebar-18 micro catheter across the occluded segment, the branches of occluded arteries were observed, and then the guide wire was withdrawn. The stent (4×20mm Solitaire) was crossed over the thrombus segment through the microcatheter, and released according to the length of the thrombus segment. Angiography showed that after the stent was in place, it was withdrawn slowly, and about 20ml of blood in the catheter was withdrawn after success. Angiography was performed again to observe the opening of the artery, and angiographic intracranial flow was evaluated by Thrombosis In Cerebral Ischemia (TICI) score8, with Grade≥2B indicating successful recanalization of the blood vessel. For those with grade<2B, stent thrombectomy was performed again. After operation, CT examination was performed immediately to evaluate the intracranial condition. Those with fresh bleeding were transferred to ICU, and those without fresh bleeding were transferred to general ward.
Observation Index: Vascular recanalization, neurological function and prognosis:
Vascular recanalization was evaluated by TICI9,10: grade 0 - no blood perfusion at the distal end of occluded vessels; Grade-1- a small amount of blood perfusion can be seen in the distal branches of occluded vessels; Grade 2A- blood flow perfusion in the distribution area of occluded artery≤50.0%; grade 2B- blood flow perfusion in the distribution area of occluded artery>50.0%; Grade-3- complete blood perfusion can be seen in the distribution area of occluded artery. Grade≥2B indicated successful recanalization. The prognosis was evaluated by MRS score11: 0 for asymptomatic; one point for mild symptoms but no obvious disability; two points for mild disability but able to handle personal affairs; Moderately disabled, requiring some assistance,three points; Severe disability, walking and physical care need assistance,four points; Severely disabled and bedridden, five points; Death, six points. From onset to admission, vascular recanalization, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS) score before thrombectomy, Alberta stroke program early CT Score(ASPECT) score before thrombectomy, occlusion site, collateral circulation, thrombectomy times, procalcitonin(PCT) Leukocyte count12, hemoglobin level, for statistically significant factors, logistic regression analysis was carried out. Among them, NIHSS ranges from 0~45 points. The higher the score, the higher the degree of neurological deficit13; ASPECT scores ranged from 0~14. The lower the score, the more severe the degree of ischemia.14
Statistical Analysis:
The data of this study were processed by spss22.0, [n(%)] represents the counting data. The test method is x2, (x̄ ± s) represents the measurement data. Normal distribution was tested by t-test, □=0.05 was the test level, the non-normal distribution was tested by rank sum test, and the risk factors were analyzed by logistic regression. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
A total of 65 patients met the inclusion criteria, 35 males and 30 females. The mean age was (63.09±8.99) years. The patency rate of occluded vessels was 96.92% (63/65). The TICI classification showed that two cases were grade 2A (3.08%),18 cases were grade 2B (27.69%), and 45 cases were Grade-3 (70.77%). There were no serious complications of thrombectomy. The time from femoral artery puncture to vascular recanalization was (84.68±23.45) minutes, and the number of thrombectomy times was (2.12±0.46). Follow up to three months after operation showed that the MRS scores of 23 cases were 3~6 and of 42 cases- 0~2.Based on the MRS scores after treatment, patients were divided into poor prognosis group and good prognosis group. there was no statistical difference in general information between the two groups (P>0.05), Table-I. By comparing and analyzing the prognostic factors of the two groups, it was found that the time from onset to admission in the good prognosis group was shorter than that in the poor prognosis group (P<0.05), the NIHSS score before thrombectomy was lower than that in the poor prognosis group (P<0.05), the ASPECT score was higher than that in the poor prognosis group (P<0.05), the vascular recanalization grade was better than that in the poor prognosis group (P<0.05), and the PCT level was lower than that in the poor prognosis group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in occlusion site, collateral circulation, thrombus removal times, PCT, leukocyte count and hemoglobin level between the two groups (P>0.05) (Table-II). Logistic regression analysis was carried out for time from onset to admission, NIHSS before thrombectomy, ASPECT score, vascular recanalization grade and PCT level. It was found that the time from onset to admission, NIHSS before thrombectomy and ASPECT score were the prognostic factors of mechanical thrombectomy in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (Table-III).
Table I
Comparison of general information between the two groups.
Group
n
Sex ratio (M/F)
Age (year)
Occlusion of blood vessels (n)
Causes of stroke (n)
Pre-circulation
Posterior circulation
Aorta
Mezzanine
Psychogenic
Control group
23
13/10
61.22±10.59
18
5
15
1
7
Observation group
41
22/20
64.12±7.94
34
8
30
3
9
x2/t
-
0.103
1.149
0.067
0.761
P
-
0.749
0.258
0.795
0.683
Table II
Comparison of prognostic factors between the two groups.
Factor
Control group (n=21)
Observation group (n=44)
x2/t
P
Time from onset to admission (h)
9.52±3.10
5.40±3.97
4.296
<0.001
Recanalization of blood vessels (n)
Class 2b
8
10
5.129
0.077
Class3
13
32
NIHSS score before thrombus removal (Score)
21.22±5.35
18.71±4.15
2.095
0.04
ASPECT score before thrombus removal (Score)
9.13±2.56
11.78±3.00
3.585
0.001
Occlusion of blood vessels (n)
Pre-circulation
18
34
0.103
0.749
Posterior circulation
5
8
Number of bolt removal(times)
2.43±0.66
2.57±0.74
0.740
0.462
PCT (ng/ml)
0.28±0.04
0.26±0.01
2.183
0.038
White blood cell count (×109/L)
11.56±3.08
10.76±3.12
0.986
0.328
Hemoglobin (g/L)
14.69±2.99
13.95±3.04
0.947
0.347
Table III
Logistic regression analysis results.
Index
B
S.E.
Wald
P
OR
95% CI
Time from onset to admission
0.865
0.311
7.745
1
0.005
1.29~4.37
NIHSS score before thrombus removal
0.966
0.381
6.42
1
0.011
1.24~5.54
ASPECT score before thrombus removal
-0.278
0.134
4.301
1
0.038
0.58~0.98
PCT (ng/ml)
-56.807
29.395
3.735
1
0.053
0~2.24
Comparison of general information between the two groups.Comparison of prognostic factors between the two groups.Logistic regression analysis results.
DISCUSSION
In this study, 65 patients with acute ischemic stroke were treated with mechanical thrombectomy. Our results showed that the occluded vessels of 65 patients were successfully opened, the vascular recanalization rate was 96.92%, and there were no serious thrombectomy complications. The time from femoral artery puncture to vascular recanalization was (84.06±16.64) minutes, and the number of thrombectomies was (2.52±0.71), suggesting that in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke, mechanical thrombectomy has good effect and can effectively recanalize the occluded blood vessels. Edgar A Samaniego et al.15 conducted a literature review study to describe early treatment options, such as venous tissue plasminogen activator and the latest mechanical thrombectomy (MT) technology. The recanalization rate with new technology and MT equipment was close to 90%. Timely interventions also had better clinical results, and about 50% of patients achieved functional independence within 90 days. Serge Bracard16 in a multi-center clinical controlled trial involving 404 patients also showed that mechanical thrombectomy combined with standard intravenous thrombolysis can improve the prognosis and functional independence of patients with acute cerebral ischemia. Mechanical thrombectomy has gradually become a new treatment scheme for intracranial large artery occlusion. Compared with intravenous thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy has a higher recanalization rate, can prolong the treatment time window, thus effectively improving the prognosis of patients.17Pathological process of acute ischemic stroke is mainly acute occlusion of cerebral vessels. This leads to the interruption of blood flow supply to brain tissue, and, subsequently, to ischemic and hypoxic brain injury, neuronal damage, and disability.18 Liet W al.19, in a study evaluating the prognosis of re-occlusion after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in Chinese stroke patients, found that NIHSS score, 90 day MRS score (4:3) and 90 day mortality in the re-closure group were higher than those in the non-re-closure group. The results of our study focused on several prognostic factors of acute thrombectomy in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke, such as time from onset to admission, NIHSS score before thrombectomy and ASPECT score. Brain tissue is highly sensitive to ischemia and hypoxia, and the time of cerebral vascular occlusion directly correlates with the time of cerebral ischemia and hypoxia and the degree of neuronal injury and poor prognosis. Studies showed that mechanical thrombectomy can prolong the time window of anterior circulation large vessel occlusion treatment to six to eight hour after the onset of symptoms, but within the treatment time window, the prognosis of patients is still closely related to the start time of treatment. For every 30 minutes extension of vascular recanalization time, the probability of good prognosis within 90 days will be reduced by 12.0%.20 NIHSS score is a common index to reflect the degree of neurological deficit. The higher NIHSS score, the larger the core infarct area and the more serious the degree of neurological deficit. Studies show that the NIHSS score of acute ischemic stroke patients with poor prognosis is significantly lower than that of patients with good prognosis, which is consistent with the results of this study.21 ASPECT score can reflect the core infarct area. The lower the score, the larger the infarct area and the worse the prognosis. The results of our study show that when mechanical thrombectomy is used to treat acute ischemic stroke, the prognosis of patients is directly affected by the time from onset to admission, and NIHSS and ASPECT scores before thrombectomy. Our results have clear clinical implications for developing and optimizing clinical treatment scheme of acute ischemic stroke. This will allow patients to get effective timely treatment after onset, shorten the time of cerebral ischemia and hypoxia, reduce the degree of neurological deficit, reduce the core infarct area, and, therefore, improve the effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy and overall prognosis.
Limitations of the study:
It includes a small sample size (65 patients), few observation indicators and no long-term follow-up, which may make the conclusion one-sided and limited. Therefore, further studies with larger sample sizes, observation indexes and extended follow-up times are needed to objectively analyze the clinical effect and prognostic factors of mechanical thrombectomy in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke.
CONCLUSION
In the treatment of acute ischemic stroke, mechanical thrombectomy is effective in quick re-opening of occluded vessels. However, the prognosis of patients is affected by the time from onset to admission, NIHSS and ASPECTS scores before thrombectomy.
Authors’ contributions:
LL, TH & FS: Conceived and designed the study.PC, JZ, GW & FS: Collected the data and performed the analysis.LL
& PC: Were involved in the writing of the manuscript and are responsible for the integrity of the study.All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Authors: William J Powers; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Teri Ackerson; Opeolu M Adeoye; Nicholas C Bambakidis; Kyra Becker; José Biller; Michael Brown; Bart M Demaerschalk; Brian Hoh; Edward C Jauch; Chelsea S Kidwell; Thabele M Leslie-Mazwi; Bruce Ovbiagele; Phillip A Scott; Kevin N Sheth; Andrew M Southerland; Deborah V Summers; David L Tirschwell Journal: Stroke Date: 2018-01-24 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Olvert A Berkhemer; Puck S S Fransen; Debbie Beumer; Lucie A van den Berg; Hester F Lingsma; Albert J Yoo; Wouter J Schonewille; Jan Albert Vos; Paul J Nederkoorn; Marieke J H Wermer; Marianne A A van Walderveen; Julie Staals; Jeannette Hofmeijer; Jacques A van Oostayen; Geert J Lycklama à Nijeholt; Jelis Boiten; Patrick A Brouwer; Bart J Emmer; Sebastiaan F de Bruijn; Lukas C van Dijk; L Jaap Kappelle; Rob H Lo; Ewoud J van Dijk; Joost de Vries; Paul L M de Kort; Willem Jan J van Rooij; Jan S P van den Berg; Boudewijn A A M van Hasselt; Leo A M Aerden; René J Dallinga; Marieke C Visser; Joseph C J Bot; Patrick C Vroomen; Omid Eshghi; Tobien H C M L Schreuder; Roel J J Heijboer; Koos Keizer; Alexander V Tielbeek; Heleen M den Hertog; Dick G Gerrits; Renske M van den Berg-Vos; Giorgos B Karas; Ewout W Steyerberg; H Zwenneke Flach; Henk A Marquering; Marieke E S Sprengers; Sjoerd F M Jenniskens; Ludo F M Beenen; René van den Berg; Peter J Koudstaal; Wim H van Zwam; Yvo B W E M Roos; Aad van der Lugt; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Charles B L M Majoie; Diederik W J Dippel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Randall T Higashida; Anthony J Furlan; Heidi Roberts; Thomas Tomsick; Buddy Connors; John Barr; William Dillon; Steven Warach; Joseph Broderick; Barbara Tilley; David Sacks Journal: Stroke Date: 2003-07-17 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Antonio J Salazar; Nicolás Useche; Sonia Bermúdez; Aníbal J Morillo; Oscar Tórres; Manuel F Granja; Natalia Rueda; Brenda Ropero Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2020-02-11 Impact factor: 3.959