| Literature DB >> 35799718 |
Sujuan Zhang1, Lijin Yuan2, Yunliang Wang3, Zhe Sun4.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the effect of Fu Yan Qing prescription on sequelae of pelvic inflammatory disease of accumulation of dampness heat and blood stasis type.Entities:
Keywords: Accumulation of dampness heat and blood stasis; Fu Yan Qing decoction; Mass absorption; Pelvic blood stasis microenvironment; Pelvic effusion; Sequelae of pelvic inflammatory disease
Year: 2022 PMID: 35799718 PMCID: PMC9247750 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.38.5.4641
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pak J Med Sci ISSN: 1681-715X Impact factor: 2.340
Comparison of clinical efficacy between the two groups [case (%)].
| Group | Number of cases | Cured | Markedly effective | Effective | Invalid | Total efficacy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 40 | 5(12.5) | 10(25.0) | 12(30.0) | 13(32.5) | 27(67.5) |
| Observation group | 40 | 11(27.5) | 16(40.0) | 8(20.0) | 5(12.5) | 35(87.5)[ |
p<0.05 compared with the control group.
Comparison of clinical index scores between the two groups before and after treatment (χ¯±scores).
| Group | Time | n | TCM syndrome score | Local sign score | Pain score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | Before treatment | 40 | 14.23±2.65 | 9.12±1.13 | 4.81±0.52 |
| After treatment | 40 | 7.13±0.83[ | 3.67±0.49[ | 2.91±0.40[ | |
| Observation group | Before treatment | 40 | 14.16±2.54 | 9.04±1.08 | 4.75±0.56 |
| After treatment | 40 | 2.87±0.41[ | 1.94±0.33[ | 1.40±0.27[ |
p<0.05 compared with this group before treatment;
P<0.05 compared with the control group after treatment.
Comparison of pelvic mass size and pelvic effusion between the two groups before and after treatment (χ¯±S,mm).
| Group | Time | n | Pelvic mass size | Pelvic effusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | Before treatment | 40 | 31.18±4.28 | 43.25±5.53 |
| After treatment | 40 | 19.32±3.17[ | 31.18±4.29[ | |
| Observation group | Before treatment | 40 | 30.87±4.15 | 43.12±5.46 |
| After treatment | 40 | 10.46±2.21[ | 25.68±4.15[ |
p<0.05 compared with this group before treatment;
p<0.05 compared with the control group after treatment
Comparison of uterine artery hemodynamic indexes between the two groups before and after treatment (χ¯±S).
| Group | Time | n | PSV(cm/s) | PI | RI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | Before treatment | 40 | 27.23±3.89 | 2.55±0.37 | 0.86±0.11 |
| After treatment | 40 | 29.59±4.08[ | 2.51±0.39 | 0.83±0.09 | |
| Observation group | Before treatment | 40 | 26.87±4.12 | 2.60±0.41 | 0.85±0.09 |
| After treatment | 40 | 32.18±4.46[ | 2.17±0.34[ | 0.75±0.08[ |
p<0.05 compared with this group before treatment;
p<0.05 compared with the control group after treatment.