| Literature DB >> 35799586 |
Xiaoyan Zhu1,2,3, Boshuai Liu1, Junnan Xiao1, Ming Guo1, Shumin Zhao1, Menglin Hu1, Yalei Cui1,2,3, Defeng Li1,2,3, Chengzhang Wang1,2,3, Sen Ma1,2,3, Yinghua Shi1,2,3.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate different roughages on fatting performance, muscle fatty acids, rumen fermentation and rumen microbes of steers. Seventy-five Simmental crossbred steers were randomly divided into wheat straw group (WG), peanut vine group (PG) and alfalfa hay group (AG), with 5 replicates of 5 steers each. The results showed a highest average daily gain and lowest feed/gain ratio in AG group (P = 0.001). Steers fed alfalfa hay had the highest muscle marbling score and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA), and also the rumen NH3-N and microbial protein (MCP) concentration among the three groups (P < 0.05). Correlation analysis showed that ruminal NH3-N and MCP were negatively correlated with muscle saturated fatty acid (SFA), while ruminal MCP was positively correlated with muscle PUFA and n-3 PUFA (P < 0.05). 16S rRNA analysis indicated that fed alfalfa hay decreased the abundance of Ruminococcaceae_UCG-001(P = 0.005). More importantly, muscle SFA deposition were positively correlated to the abundance of Ruminococcaceae_UCG-001 (P < 0.05), while the muscle PUFA and n-3 PUFA deposition were negatively correlated to it (P < 0.01). Therefore, alfalfa hay provides a better fattening effect on steers. Alfalfa rich in n-3 PUFA would reduce the abundance of Ruminococcaceae_UCG-001 involved in hydrogenation, increase the rumen protective effect of C18:3 n-3, which is beneficial to the deposition of muscle n-3 PUFA and PUFA.Entities:
Keywords: alfalfa hay; meat quality; peanut vine; rumen microbe; wheat straw
Year: 2022 PMID: 35799586 PMCID: PMC9253607 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.885069
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Nutrient compositions of three roughages (DM %).
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| DM | 89.60 | 91.30 | 92.40 |
| CP | 5.60 | 12.20 | 16.80 |
| EE | 1.60 | 2.60 | 1.30 |
| NDF | 80.00 | 49.17 | 39.69 |
| ADF | 62.00 | 40.80 | 31.99 |
| Ca | 0.05 | 1.25 | 1.95 |
| P | 0.06 | 0.34 | 0.28 |
| Myristic (C14:0) | 4.34 | 2.67 | 1.05 |
| Pentadecanoic (C15:0) | 6.28 | – | – |
| Palmitic (C16:0) | 9.32 | 27.24 | 19.7 |
| Palmitoleic (C16:1) | – | – | – |
| Heptadecanoic (C17:1) | 0.54 | – | 0.43 |
| Stearic (C18:0) | 0.19 | 3.22 | 3.1 |
| Oleic (C18:1 | 0.70 | 19.73 | 2.71 |
| Linoleic (C18:2 | 1.05 | 31.14 | 18.4 |
| Linolenic (C18:3 | – | 9.16 | 28.6 |
| Arachidic (C20:0) | 0.18 | 0.27 | 1.5 |
DM, dry matter; CP, crude protein; EE, ether extract; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber; Ca, calcium; P, phosphorus.
Ingredients and chemical compositions of trial diets (DM%).
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||
| Wheat straw | 24.15 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Peanut vine | 0.00 | 24.15 | 0.00 |
| Alfalfa hay | 0.00 | 0.00 | 24.15 |
| Whole corn silage | 27.55 | 27.55 | 27.55 |
| Concentrate feed | 48.30 | 48.30 | 48.30 |
|
| |||
| NEmf, MJ/kg (DM) | 6.48 | 6.73 | 6.76 |
| CP | 9.12 | 10.24 | 11.98 |
| NDF | 40.46 | 32.86 | 30.40 |
| ADF | 26.13 | 20.88 | 18.61 |
| Ca | 1.06 | 1.09 | 1.05 |
| P | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.59 |
WG, wheat straw group; PG, peanut vine group; AG, alfalfa hay group; n = 5.
The concentrate feed was consisted of 60% corn, 10% dry distiller's grains, 10% soybean meal, 13% wheat bran, 1% limestone, 2% NaHCO
NE.
Performance, carcass characteristics, chemical compositions and meat quality of longissimus dorsi muscle in Simmental crossbred steers (DM%).
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| |||||
| DMI, kg/d | 9.58 | 10.17 | 9.72 | 0.08 | 0.001 |
| ADG, kg/d | 0.84 | 1.05 | 1.25 | 0.05 | 0.001 |
| F/G | 11.41 | 9.92 | 7.80 | 0.49 | 0.001 |
|
| |||||
| Cold carcass weight, kg | 256.10 | 261.10 | 276.90 | 4.63 | 0.161 |
| Dressing percentage, % | 53.35 | 52.69 | 54.12 | 0.78 | 0.781 |
| Net meat mass, kg | 215.17 | 218.69 | 233.73 | 4.11 | 0.147 |
| Net meat percentage, % | 44.83 | 44.13 | 45.68 | 0.69 | 0.686 |
| Meat mass/Bone mass | 5.25 | 5.16 | 5.42 | 0.06 | 0.283 |
| Loin-eye area, cm2 | 76.50 | 74.75 | 79.40 | 1.79 | 0.598 |
|
| |||||
| Moisture, % | 76.13 | 74.54 | 74.00 | 0.004 | 0.061 |
| CP, % | 19.72 | 21.45 | 20.40 | 0.30 | 0.040 |
| EE, % | 3.51 | 4.37 | 4.92 | 0.36 | 0.299 |
| Ash, % | 1.09 | 1.13 | 1.10 | 0.06 | 0.962 |
|
| |||||
| pH48 | 6.12 | 6.34 | 5.91 | 0.08 | 0.085 |
| Marbling score | 2.13 | 2.20 | 3.00 | 0.16 | 0.037 |
| Cooking yield, % | 63.92 | 69.98 | 67.03 | 0.01 | 0.140 |
| Shear force ( | 71.13 | 64.95 | 63.27 | 2.01 | 0.237 |
WG, wheat straw group; PG, peanut vine group; AG, alfalfa hay group; n = 5.
DMI, dry matter intake; ADG, average daily gain; F/G, feed/gain ratio.
CP, crude protein; EE, ether extract.
PH
Means within rows with different superscript letters differ (P < 0.05).
Fatty acid composition of longissimus dorsi muscle from Simmental crossbred steers fed different roughage diets.
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
| Myristic (C14:0) | 2.09 | 2.12 | 1.99 | 0.07 | 0.742 |
| Palmitic (C16:0) | 24.17 | 24.82 | 23.35 | 0.37 | 0.286 |
| Palmitoleic (C16:1) | 3.61 | 3.38 | 4.45 | 0.20 | 0.050 |
| Heptadecenoic (C17:1) | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.02 | 0.246 |
| Stearic (C18:0) | 17.86 | 17.25 | 14.90 | 0.69 | 0.187 |
| Oleic (C18:1 | 42.83 | 41.78 | 42.93 | 0.52 | 0.253 |
| Linoleic (C18:2 | 6.25 | 6.96 | 7.83 | 0.30 | 0.091 |
| Linolenic (C18:3 | 0.37 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.02 | 0.029 |
| Arachidic (C20:0) | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.21 | 0.02 | 0.393 |
| Gadoleic (C20:1) | 0.39 | 0.45 | 0.50 | 0.02 | 0.159 |
| Arachidonic (C20:4 | 1.44 | 1.60 | 1.53 | 0.07 | 0.679 |
| SFA | 44.41 | 44.48 | 40.45 | 0.78 | 0.035 |
| MUFA | 47.56 | 46.38 | 49.70 | 0.67 | 0.109 |
| PUFA | 8.06 | 9.02 | 9.84 | 0.35 | 0.111 |
| 7.69 | 8.56 | 9.36 | 0.34 | 0.131 | |
| 0.37 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.02 | 0.029 | |
| 21.03 | 19.10 | 19.72 | 0.74 | 0.597 | |
WG, wheat straw group; PG, peanut vine group; AG, alfalfa hay group; n = 4.
SFA, saturated fatty acids (14:0 + 16:0 +18:0 + 20:0).
MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids (16:1 + 17:1 + 9c18:1 + 20:1).
PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids (18:2n−6 + 18:3n−3 + 20:4n−6).
n−6 PUFA (18:2n−6 + 20:4n−6).
n−3 PUFA (18:3n−3).
Means within rows with different superscript letters differ (P < 0.05).
Effects of different roughage diets on rumen fermentation parameters in Simmental crossbred steers.
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
| pH | 6.74 | 6.45 | 6.63 | 0.07 | 0.224 |
| NH3-N, mg/dl | 4.59 | 6.29 | 8.01 | 0.45 | 0.001 |
| MCP, μg/ml | 102.10 | 118.63 | 283.93 | 30.60 | 0.001 |
|
| |||||
| AA, mg/ml | 68.35 | 67.65 | 59.19 | 1.91 | 0.068 |
| PA, mg/ml | 10.35 | 16.39 | 16.09 | 1.05 | 0.002 |
| BA, mg/ml | 9.93 | 10.87 | 11.18 | 0.43 | 0.455 |
| AA/PA | 6.61 | 4.14 | 3.69 | 0.46 | 0.000 |
WG, wheat straw group; PG, peanut vine group; AG, alfalfa hay group; n = 4.
MCP, microbial protein.
VFA, volatile fatty acids; AA, acetic acid; PA, propionic acid; BA, butyric acid; AA/PA, AA:PA ratio.
When P-values were below 0.001, the values were uniformly expressed as <0.001.
Means within rows with different superscript letters differ (P < 0.05).
Figure 1Alpha diversity statistics comparison. (A) Sobs index of OTU level. (B) Shannon index of OTU level. (C) Chao index of OTU level. Steers were fed a wheat straw diet (WG), n = 4; Steers were fed a peanut vine diet (PG), n = 4; Steers were fed an alfalfa hay diet (AG), n = 4. Error bars represent standard deviations and their lengths are adjusted at 95% confidence interval.
Figure 2Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of rumen bacterial community structures of steers in the three groups. PCoA plots based on weighted UniFrac distance. Steers were fed a wheat straw diet (WG), n = 4; Steers were fed a peanut vine diet (PG), n = 4; Steers were fed alfalfa hay diet (AG), n = 4.
Figure 3The relative abundance of phyla and genera in rumen bacteria community. (A) Community abundance on phylum level in three treatment groups. (B) Community abundance on genus level in three treatment groups. WG, wheat straw group, n = 4; PG, peanut vine group, n = 4; AG, alfalfa hay group, n = 4.
Figure 4Difference of rumen bacteria at the phylum and genus level. (A) Analysis on the difference of p_Tenericutes abundance at phylum level. (B) Analysis on the difference of g_Ruminococcaceae_UCG-001 abundance at genus level. (C) Analysis on the difference of g_norank_f_Bacteroidales_BS11_gut_group abundance at genus level. (D) Analysis on the difference of g_ Anaeroplasma abundance at genus level. (E) Analysis on the difference of g_ Prevotella_1 abundance at genus level. WG, wheat straw group, n = 4; PG, peanut vine group, n = 4; AG, alfalfa hay group, n = 4. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Correlation between rumen fermentation parameters and muscle fatty acids.
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| SFA | −0.737 | −0.721 | 0.738 | −0.643 | −0.472 | 0.789 |
| MUFA | 0.840 | 0.517 | −0.910 | 0.578 | 0.451 | −0.780 |
| PUFA | 0.350 | 0.718 | −0.317 | 0.447 | 0.326 | −0.495 |
| 0.329 | 0.698 | −0.299 | 0.431 | 0.345 | −0.473 | |
| 0.586 | 0.830 | −0.515 | 0.576 | −0.061 | −0.709 | |
| −0.480 | −0.361 | 0.366 | −0.438 | 0.402 | 0.558 | |
SFA, saturated fatty acids (14:0 + 16:0 +18:0 + 20:0); MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids (16:1 + 17:1 + 9c18:1 + 20:1); PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids (18:2n−6 + 18:3n−3 + 20:4n−6); n−6 PUFA (18:2n−6 + 20:4n−6); n−3 PUFA (18:3n−3).
MCP, microbial protein; AA, acetic acid; PA, propionic acid; BA, butyric acid; AA/PA, AA:PA ratio.
Indicate highly significant correlation (P < 0.01);
indicate significant correlation (P < 0.05).
Figure 5Correlation between rumen microorganism and environmental factors. Red stands for positive correlation, blue stands for negative correlation. SFA, saturated fatty acids (14:0 + 16:0 +18:0 + 20:0); MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids (16:1 + 17:1 + 9c18:1 + 20:1); PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids (18:2n−6 + 18:3n−3 + 20:4n−6); n−6 PUFA (18:2n−6 + 20:4n−6); n−3 PUFA (18:3n−3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.