| Literature DB >> 35799208 |
You-Zhou Chen1, Xing-Shan Zhao2, Jian-Song Yuan3, Yan Zhang4, Wei Liu5, Shu-Bin Qiao6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alcohol septal ablation (ASA) has been proven to reverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, there are no studies on the effect of sex on LV remodeling after ASA. We aimed to investigate whether sex differences affect the process of LV remodeling and outcome after ASA.Entities:
Keywords: Alcohol septal ablation; Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; Remodeling; Sex
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35799208 PMCID: PMC9264620 DOI: 10.1186/s13293-022-00447-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Sex Differ ISSN: 2042-6410 Impact factor: 8.811
Baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics
| Men ( | Women ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 47 ± 8 | 55 ± 6 | < 0.001 |
| BSA (m2) | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | < 0.001 |
| HR (bpm) | 77 ± 9 | 74 ± 9 | 0.338 |
| SBP (mm Hg) | 129 ± 12 | 132 ± 17 | 0.382 |
| DBP (mm Hg) | 73 ± 12 | 75 ± 13 | 0.342 |
| Menopausal status | NA | 48 (90.6%) | |
| NYHA (median) | 2 (1, 4) | 3 (2, 4) | < 0.001 |
| Hypertension | 3 (5.6%) | 4 (7.5%) | 0.677 |
| Diabetes | 3 (5.6%) | 2 (3.8%) | 0.662 |
| Nonsustained VT | 5 (9.3%) | 6 (11.3%) | 0.974 |
| Chest pain | 11 (20.4%) | 20 (37.7%) | 0.077 |
| Dyspnea | 27 (50.0%) | 39 (73.6%) | 0.021 |
| Syncope | 4 (7.4%) | 3 (5.7%) | 0.715 |
| Family history of HCM or sudden death | 7 (12.9%) | 5 (9.4%) | 0.786 |
| Medications | |||
| Beta blockers | 32 (59.3%) | 27 (50.9%) | 0.503 |
| Nondihydropyridine CCB | 8 (14.8%) | 15 (28.3%) | 0.144 |
| ACEI/ARB | 8 (14.8%) | 13 (24.5%) | 0.307 |
| Diuretics | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (5.7%) | 0.235 |
| Moderate or severe MR | 28 (51.9%) | 39 (73.6%) | 0.037 |
| Alcohol use | 2.3 ± 0.5 | 1.6 ± 0.4 | < 0.001 |
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD, number (percentage), or median (interquartile range)
BSA: body surface area, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, NYHA New York Heart Association; VT ventricular tachycardia; SCD sudden cardiac death; HCM hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, CCB calcium channel blocker, ACEI angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, ARB angiotensin receptor blocker, MR mitral regurgitation, LVOTG left ventricular outflow tract gradient
Cardiac magnetic resonance data before and after ASA according to sex
| Men ( | Women ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Septal thickness (mm) | |||
| Baseline | 21.0 ± 1.8 | 21.5 ± 2.8 | 0.419 |
| Follow-up | 15.1 ± 1.5 | 16.5 ± 2.7 | 0.009 |
| Changes | 5.9 ± 1.6 | 5.0 ± 1.5 | 0.013 |
| | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
| Posterior wall thickness (mm) | |||
| Baseline | 10.2 ± 1.4 | 10.9 ± 1.8 | 0.046 |
| Follow-up | 8.6 ± 1.1 | 9.8 ± 1.6 | < 0.001 |
| Changes | 1.6 ± 0.7 | 1.1 ± 0.7 | 0.005 |
| | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
| LVM index (g/m2) | |||
| Baseline | 95.1 ± 15.6 | 108.6 ± 16.6 | 0.001 |
| Follow-up | 80.8 ± 15.7 | 97.1 ± 15.9 | < 0.001 |
| Changes | 14.3 ± 4.1 | 11.4 ± 1.9 | 0.001 |
| | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
| Post-ablation infarct (g) | 11.2 ± 2.8 | 7.8 ± 2.2 | < 0.001 |
| LVM reduction ratio, % | 15.3 ± 4.3 | 10.7 ± 1.8 | < 0.001 |
| LVEDV index (g/m2) | |||
| Baseline | 69.5 ± 7.2 | 66.8 ± 7.6 | 0.129 |
| Follow-up | 77.0 ± 7.6 | 72.2 ± 6.9 | 0.006 |
| Changes | 7.5 ± 2.3 | 5.4 ± 1.3 | < 0.001 |
| | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
| LVESV index (ml/m2) | |||
| Baseline | 24.8 ± 2.9 | 21.8 ± 2.9 | 0.006 |
| Follow-up | 26.5 ± 3.3 | 23.2 ± 2.7 | < 0.001 |
| Changes | 1.7 ± 0.8 | 1.4 ± 0.7 | 0.102 |
| | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
| EF (%) | |||
| Baseline | 64.1 ± 3.5 | 67.2 ± 4.4 | 0.002 |
| Follow-up | 65.5 ± 3.6 | 67.8 ± 3.9 | 0.014 |
| Changes | 1.4 ± 0.04 | 0.5 ± 0.02 | 0.015 |
| | < 0.001 | 0.006 | |
| Remote LGE (g) | |||
| Baseline | 9.9 ± 2.9 | 12.2 ± 2.3 | 0.001 |
| Follow-up | 9.9 ± 2.9 | 12.3 ± 2.3 | 0.001 |
| Changes | 0.05 ± 0.19 | 0.10 ± 0.36 | 0.433 |
| | 0.153 | 0.100 | |
| LVOTG (mmHg) | |||
| Baseline | 90.6 ± 10.9 | 100.1 ± 18.9 | 0.012 |
| Follow-up | 15.2 ± 8.4 | 31.1 ± 9.1 | < 0.001 |
| Changes | 75.4 ± 9.5 | 68.9 ± 13.3 | 0.022 |
| | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
LV left ventricular, LVM left ventricular mass, EDV end-diastolic volume, ESV end-systolic volume, EF ejection fraction, LGE late gadolinium enhancement, LVOTG left ventricular outflow tract gradient
Fig. 1Short-axis and four-chamber CMR images of the LV acquired at the end-diastole. The upper panel (A and B) depicts the male ventricle with an LVM index of 81.12 g/m2 and an LVEDV index of 62.76 ml/m2 at baseline. The lower panel (Figure C and D) depicts the reverse remodeling of the ventricle with an LVM index of 70.55 g/m2 and a LVEDV index of 69.23 ml/m2 in the follow-up. LV: left ventricle, LVM: left ventricular mass, LVEDV left ventricular end-diastolic volume
Fig. 2Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images in one female patient before ASA with an LVM index of 151.74 g/m2, an LVEDV index of 79.61 ml/m2 and a remote LGE of 13.52 g (A) and at follow-up after ASA with an LVM index of 141.26 g/m2, an LVEDV index of 84.61 ml/m2 and a remote LGE of 13.47 g (B) and in one male patient before ASA with an LVM index of 107.04 g/m2, an LVEDV index of 83.84 ml/m2 and a remote LGE of 9.16 g (C) and at follow-up after ASA with an LVM index of 90.59 g/m2, an LVEDV index of 89.09 ml/m2 and a remote LGE of 9.09 g (D). The blue arrows indicate the position of the alcohol ablation. ASA alcohol septal ablation, LVM left ventricular mass, LVEDV left ventricular end-diastolic volume, LGE late gadolinium enhancement
Fig. 3Comparison of A LVM index, B LV EDV index, C LGE and D left ventricular outflow tract gradient in men (n = 54) versus women (n = 53) at baseline and long-term follow-up after ASA LVM left ventricular mass, LVEDV left ventricular end-diastolic volume, LGE late gadolinium enhancement, ASA alcohol septal ablation
Predictors of the reduction of LVM after ASA by multivariable logistic regression
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta ± SE | Beta ± SE | |||
| Age | − 0.44 ± 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||
| Sex | − 0.58 ± 0.008 | < 0.001 | − 0.31 ± 0.009 | 0.007 |
| BSA | 0.30 ± 0.031 | 0.011 | ||
| HR | − 0.02 ± 0.001 | 0.902 | ||
| SBP | − 0.06 ± 0.00 | 0.626 | ||
| DBP | − 0.08 ± 0.00 | 0.495 | ||
| Menopausal status | − 0.17 ± 0.00 | 0.319 | ||
| Hypertension | − 0.04 ± 0.005 | 0.741 | ||
| Diabetes | − 0.06 ± 0.019 | 0.624 | ||
| Atrial fibrillation | − 0.21 ± 0.013 | 0.087 | ||
| LVOT gradient reduction | − 0.46 ± 0.000 | < 0.001 | − 0.389 ± 0.000 | < 0.001 |
| MR changes | 0.08 ± 0.008 | 0.493 | ||
| Baseline septal thickness | − 0.09 ± 0.002 | 0.443 | ||
| Baseline LVM index | − 0.51 ± 0.001 | < 0.001 | − 0.305 ± 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Baseline LVEDV index | − 0.002 ± 0.001 | 0.987 | ||
| Baseline LVESV index | − 0.15 ± 0.001 | 0.223 | ||
| Post-ablation infarct size | 0.57 ± 0.002 | < 0.001 | ||
| Remote LGE | − 0.42 ± 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||
BSA body surface area, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, MR mitral regurgitation, LVOTG left ventricular outflow tract gradient, LV left ventricular, LVM left ventricular mass, EDV end-diastolic volume, ESV end-systolic volume, LGE late gadolinium enhancement, LVOT left ventricular outflow tract
Predictors of the reversal of LVM remodeling (decrease in LVM index > 12% of baseline LVM index) after alcohol septal ablation by multivariable logistic regression
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | OR | 95% | |||
| Age | 0.974 | 0.348 | |||
| Sex | 0.176 | 0.001 | 0.132 | [0.038, 0.456] | 0.001 |
| HR | 1.00 | 0.990 | |||
| Menopausal status | 0.644 | 0.586 | |||
| Hypertension | 1.029 | 0.906 | |||
| Diabetes | 0.221 | 0.188 | |||
| Atrial fibrillation | 0.604 | 0.468 | |||
| LVOTG reduction | 0.958 | 0.048 | |||
| MR changes | 1.101 | 0.799 | |||
| Baseline septal thickness | 1.132 | 0.238 | |||
| Baseline LVM index | 0.985 | 0.272 | |||
| Baseline LVEDV index | 1.067 | 0.056 | |||
| Baseline LVESV index | 1.171 | 0.044 | |||
| Post-ablation infarct | 1.256 | 0.024 | |||
| Remote LGE | 0.950 | 0.367 | |||
HR heart rate, MR mitral regurgitation, LVOTG left ventricular outflow tract gradient, LV left ventricular, LVM left ventricular mass, EDV end-diastolic volume, ESV end-systolic volume, EF ejection fraction, LGE late gadolinium enhancement, LVOTG left ventricular outflow tract gradient
Fig. 4Kaplan–Meier curve of the composite endpoint in female patients undergoing ASA vs. male patients