Literature DB >> 35799199

Fibrin glue injection method for complex fistula after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a case report.

Hideki Izumi1, Hisamichi Yoshii2, Rin Abe2, Masaya Mukai2, Eiji Nomura2, Hiroyasu Makuuchi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic fistula is the most problematic complication in pancreatectomy. Although drainage can be used to relieve this complication, pancreatic surgeons often encounter refractory pancreatic fistula. Fibrin glue injection, with the use of a twofold diluted solution B and a double-lumen tube, was found effective in treating this complicated pancreatic fistula. CASE
PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 64-year-old Japanese man who underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic tail cancer. After initial drainage of the pancreatic fistula diagnosed 4 days postoperatively, on day 134, refractory pancreatic fistula was observed using contrast-enhanced computed tomography. We used fibrin glue injection, with a twofold diluted solution containing thrombin and calcium chloride and a double-lumen tube, for treating the refractory fistula; the fluid drainage was almost stopped with no fever or abdominal pain. No recurrence of pancreatic cancer has been observed since the procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: Fibrin glue injection was effective for complicated pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. Using a twofold diluted solution B containing thrombin and calcium chloride and a double-lumen tube makes possible the thorough injection of fibrin glue.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distal pancreatectomy; Fibrin glue injection; Pancreatic fistula

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35799199      PMCID: PMC9264532          DOI: 10.1186/s13256-022-03406-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Case Rep        ISSN: 1752-1947


Background

Distal pancreatectomy is a well-established surgical procedure for treating pancreatic body and tail cancer. Despite the advancements in surgical techniques and perioperative management in recent years, numerous complication cases are still encountered during distal pancreatectomy. In particular, pancreatic fistula still accounts for a high percentage or 10%–40% of cases, causing serious complications such as intraabdominal abscess and hemorrhage [1, 2]. Although pancreatic fistula can often be relieved by drainage in general, complicated fistula formation with the development of refractory pancreatic fistula is occasionally encountered in some cases. Fibrin glue injection has been performed for treating refractory fistula, although there are various other medical procedures [3-6]. Herein, we report our experience of positive outcomes with fibrin glue injection using a twofold diluted thrombin injection method.

Case presentation

The patient was a 64-year-old Japanese man with a past medical history of high blood pressure. He was receiving conservative medical treatment because of the development of superior mesenteric artery dissection. A pancreatic tail tumor was detected in the periodical abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan. The yellow arrow indicates a pancreatic cancer site

Preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan. The yellow arrow indicates a pancreatic cancer site We performed laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy on the basis of the diagnosis of pancreatic tail cancer. In addition, a 5-min suppression and a 5-min resection were performed for the pancreatic cut end margin using a Powered Echelon 60 Green cartridge. Closed drainages were placed in the pancreatic stump and under the left diaphragm. The surgical time and hemorrhage volume were 267 min and 600 ml, respectively. Histopathological findings showed invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas, Pt, 20 mm × 20 mm, and pStage IB (UICC, eighth edition). On day 1 after surgery, the patient had a serum amylase level of 1303 U/L but high drain amylase levels (drainage of the pancreatic stump: 52,270 U/L, left subphrenic drainage: 6626 U/L). The color tone of the drainage was wine red. On day 4 after surgery, his serum amylase level was 134 U/L, and he was diagnosed with pancreatic fistula on the basis of the drain amylase level (drainage of the pancreatic stump: 420 U/L, left subphrenic drainage: 865 U/L). On day 7 after surgery, the patient developed a high inflammation level and persistent fever, due to which a contrast-enhanced CT scan was performed (Fig. 2a). The findings showed spread of abscess from the dorsal side of the stomach to the surrounding lateral segment of the liver (Fig. 2b), and hence, a drainage tube was inserted under echo guidance (Fig. 3).
Fig. 2

a Contrast-enhanced computed tomography examination on day 7 after surgery. The yellow, red, and blue arrows indicate the drain, stapler of pancreatic stump, and abscess formation of the pancreatic fistula, respectively. b Contrast-enhanced computed tomography examination on day 7 after surgery. The yellow and blue arrows indicate the drain and abscess formation of the pancreatic fistula, respectively

Fig. 3

A percutaneous drainage tube was inserted on day 7 after surgery (blue arrow)

a Contrast-enhanced computed tomography examination on day 7 after surgery. The yellow, red, and blue arrows indicate the drain, stapler of pancreatic stump, and abscess formation of the pancreatic fistula, respectively. b Contrast-enhanced computed tomography examination on day 7 after surgery. The yellow and blue arrows indicate the drain and abscess formation of the pancreatic fistula, respectively A percutaneous drainage tube was inserted on day 7 after surgery (blue arrow) On day 10 after surgery, the left subphrenic drain was removed as there was almost no drainage fluid. On day 17 after surgery, the drainage tube inserted under echo guidance was removed. The patient’s condition was managed only by one pancreatic stump drain inserted during the surgery. Later, the drainage fluid volume was still approximately 50–100 ml. On day 36 after surgery, a contrast agent administered from the drain revealed the image of abscess cavity (Fig. 4). However, we could not confirm a reduction in the abscess cavity. Nevertheless, we still made repeated attempts to adjust a drain location while periodically checking the size of the abscess cavity via imaging the drain.
Fig. 4

The abscess cavity was visualized by imaging from the drain on day 36 after surgery

The abscess cavity was visualized by imaging from the drain on day 36 after surgery No method other than drainage was used, and only drain changes were performed about once every 2 weeks. On day 134 after surgery, the patient developed fever, for which we conducted a contrast-enhanced CT that showed the abscess cavity around the drain (Fig. 5). After performing the contrast-enhanced CT imaging of the drain, we confirmed the presence of a communication to the stomach from the abscess cavity (Fig. 6).
Fig. 5

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography examination on day 134 after surgery. The yellow and blue arrows indicate the drain and the abscess cavity, respectively

Fig. 6

Drain imaging on day 134 after surgery. The contrast agent flows into the stomach from the red arrow portion. The black arrow indicates the line of the gastric wall

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography examination on day 134 after surgery. The yellow and blue arrows indicate the drain and the abscess cavity, respectively Drain imaging on day 134 after surgery. The contrast agent flows into the stomach from the red arrow portion. The black arrow indicates the line of the gastric wall On day 135 after surgery, fibrin glue (Beriplast P, ZLB Behring KK, Tokyo, Japan) was injected from the drain using Ring-McLean Sump Drainage Set-Straight (Cook Japan, Tokyo, Japan) as a double-lumen tube. We injected solution A containing fibrinogen from the primary route of the double-lumen tube and twofold diluted solution B containing thrombin and calcium chloride with normal saline solution from the other route. We injected both fluids at the same time while removing the drain over a period of about 5 seconds to ensure that the entire abscess cavity was covered with fibrin glue. Solution A and the twofold diluted solution B were simultaneously injected, after which the fluid drainage was almost stopped with no fever or abdominal pain at the time. The drain was removed 5 days after the injection as there was no increase in inflammation reaction even with the blood withdrawal. Currently, 4 years has elapsed since the surgery, and the patient returns for a follow-up visit as an outpatient without any recurrence of pancreatic cancer.

Discussion

Pancreatic fistula is the most problematic complication associated with pancreatectomy. According to recent reports, the frequency of the occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula in distal pancreatectomy is still high at 10%–40% [1, 2]. Pancreatic fistula may possibly become a trigger for serious complications such as intraabdominal abscess and hemorrhage. Drainage can be used as a basic method for dealing with pancreatic fistula. However, pancreatic surgeons often encounter refractory pancreatic fistula. Fibrin glue injection can be used for treating refractory pancreatic fistula with positive results. Although there are several reports regarding the risk factors for pancreatic fistula, pancreatic thickness [7, 8] and hardness [9], BMI [10], and diabetes [11] can also be risk factors in distal pancreatectomy. There have been clinical trials for the treatment of pancreatic dissection and pancreatic resection/stump closure to prevent pancreatic fistula in distal pancreatectomy. The DISPACT trial, a large-scale multicenter study in Europe, was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing pancreatic stump closure between an autosuture device and hand suturing, but there was no difference between those groups in terms of postoperative pancreatic fistula [12]. With the increasing application of laparoscopic pancreatectomy in recent years, pancreatotomy using a stapler has become more common [13]. Moreover, with the development of a cartridge equipped with polyglycolic acid mesh for reducing the incidence of pancreatic fistula, safety has also been confirmed in some studies reported till date [14, 15]. In addition, an RCT performed at the time of distal pancreatectomy to prevent pancreatic fistula by anastomosing the caudal pancreatic duct and the digestive tract of the remnant pancreas during pancreatectomy reported no significant difference between both sites [16]. Although the technique of preventive preoperative pancreatic duct stent placement has been described [17], it is not widely used because of a possibility of complications such as pancreatitis. Several studies have demonstrated that fibrin glue injections are an effective treatment for refractory fistulas [3, 4]. It is believed that fibrin glue closes the fistula through two major phases of physiological coagulation [3]. In the first phase, it acts as a closing plug among tissues, resulting in rapid adhesion. The second phase involves promoting fibroblast cells into the fibrin glue, enhancing the growth of granulation tissue, and adsorbing various proteins such as fibronectin from the surrounding tissues. Thus, the glue is absorbed within 4 weeks and replaced by connective scar tissue [4, 5]. A problem associated with the fibrin glue injection method is that when fibrinogen solution is mixed with thrombin solution, the mixture would be coagulated in the catheter instantly, eventually causing catheter obstruction. In several cases, we have attempted to prevent coagulation in the catheter using a double-lumen catheter [5, 6]. Murakami et al. [18] reported that a complicated fistula could be filled in a condition where the coagulation time was extended without a change in tensile strength when the thrombin solution was diluted. It is possible to achieve positive results by injecting a twofold diluted solution B containing thrombin and calcium chloride using a double-lumen tube. This method is considered as an effective treatment for refractory pancreatic fistula.

Conclusions

Fibrin glue injection was effective for complicated pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. Using a twofold diluted solution B containing thrombin and calcium chloride and a double-lumen tube makes possible the thorough injection of fibrin glue.
  18 in total

1.  Endoscopic closure of esophagobronchial fistula with fibrin glue.

Authors:  Nicholas Ogunmola; Robert Wyllie; Karen McDowell; Marsha Kay; Lori Mahajan
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.839

2.  Prediction of Pancreatic Fistula by Preoperatively Assessable Factors; Retrospective Review of Unified Operations by Single Surgeon.

Authors:  Masafumi Nakamura; Koji Shindo; Noboru Ideno; Junji Ueda; Shunichi Takahata; Hiroshi Nakashima; Takao Ohtsuka; Shuji Shimizu; Yoshinao Oda; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2014-05

Review 3.  Perioperative management of distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Fujino
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  The influence of transection site on the development of pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy: A review of 294 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Naomi M Sell; Michael J Pucci; Salil Gabale; Benjamin E Leiby; Ernest L Rosato; Jordan M Winter; Charles J Yeo; Harish Lavu
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Randomized clinical trial of duct-to-mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy versus handsewn closure after distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  K Uemura; S Satoi; F Motoi; M Kwon; M Unno; Y Murakami
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Selective occlusion with fibrin glue under fistuloscopy: seven cases of postoperative management for intractable complex fistulas.

Authors:  T Kurokawa; S Okushiba; M Kadoya; D Miyamoto; Y Kurashima; H Kitagami; J Ikeda; M Sunaga; Y Shinzato; T Ozawa; S Kondo; H Katoh
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial.

Authors:  Markus K Diener; Christoph M Seiler; Inga Rossion; Jörg Kleeff; Matthias Glanemann; Giovanni Butturini; Ales Tomazic; Christiane J Bruns; Olivier R C Busch; Stefan Farkas; Orlin Belyaev; John P Neoptolemos; Christopher Halloran; Tobias Keck; Marco Niedergethmann; Klaus Gellert; Helmut Witzigmann; Otto Kollmar; Peter Langer; Ulrich Steger; Jens Neudecker; Frederik Berrevoet; Silke Ganzera; Markus M Heiss; Steffen P Luntz; Thomas Bruckner; Meinhard Kieser; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: staplers do not decrease fistula rates.

Authors:  Cristina R Ferrone; Andrew L Warshaw; David W Rattner; David Berger; Hui Zheng; Bhupendra Rawal; Ruben Rodriguez; Sarah P Thayer; Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Therapeutic fistuloscopy: an alternative approach in the management of postoperative fistulas.

Authors:  Efthimios Eleftheriadis; Katerina Kotzampassi
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.588

10.  Chronic pancreatitis of the pancreatic remnant is an independent risk factor for pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Marius Distler; Stephan Kersting; Felix Rückert; Peggy Kross; Hans-Detlev Saeger; Jürgen Weitz; Robert Grützmann
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.