| Literature DB >> 35799191 |
Xin Jin1, Meng Zhang1, Rui Sun1,2, Hairong Lyu1, Xia Xiao1, Xiaomei Zhang1,2, Fan Li3, Danni Xie1, Xia Xiong1, Jiaxi Wang1, Wenyi Lu4, Hongkai Zhang5, Mingfeng Zhao6,7.
Abstract
Relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has a poor prognosis. In this study, we evaluated chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy targeting CLL-1 in adults with R/R AML patients. Patients received conditioning chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) and fludarabine (30 mg/m2) for 3 days and an infusion of a dose of 1-2 × 106 CAR-T cells/kg. The incidence of dose-limiting toxicity was the primary endpoint. Ten patients were treated, and all developed cytokine release syndrome (CRS); 4 cases were low-grade, while the remaining 6 were considered high-grade CRS. No patient developed CAR-T cell-related encephalopathy syndrome (CRES). Severe pancytopenia occurred in all patients. Two patients died of severe infection due to chronic agranulocytosis. The complete response (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate was 70% (n = 7/10). The median follow-up time was 173 days (15-488), and 6 patients were alive at the end of the last follow-up. CAR-T cells showed peak expansion within 2 weeks. Notably, CLL-1 is also highly expressed in normal granulocytes, so bridging hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) may be a viable strategy to rescue long-term agranulocytosis due to off-target toxicity. In conclusion, this study is the first to demonstrate the positive efficacy and tolerable safety of CLL-1 CAR-T cell therapy in adult R/R AML.Entities:
Keywords: Acute myeloid leukemia; C-type lectin-like molecule 1; Chimeric antigen receptor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35799191 PMCID: PMC9264641 DOI: 10.1186/s13045-022-01308-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hematol Oncol ISSN: 1756-8722 Impact factor: 23.168
Characteristics of patients before CAR-T cell treatment
| ID | Age/Sex | FAB subtype | Fusion gene | Gene mutation | Karyotype | History of MDS/MPN | Prior lines of treatment | Previous HSCT | Extramedullary invasion | Pre-infusion disease burden (%) | Post-infusion disease burden (%)/efficacy evaluation | Bridged HSCT | CLL-1 Positivity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53/F | M5 | Negative | KRAS、TET2、ETV6 | 46, XX, -7, + mar | Yes | 6 | No | Yes | 16.43 | 71.78/NR | Yes | 50.2 |
| 2 | 44/M | M2 | N/A | NPM1、DNMT3A、IDH1、RUNX1、NRAS | N/A | No | 8 | No | No | 13.47 | 35.42/NR | Yes | 90.3 |
| 3 | 73/M | M5 | Negative | RUNX1、CEBPA、TET2、ASXL1、NRAS | 46, XY del (7), (q22q34) | Yes | 2 | No | No | 18.49 | 0.23/CRi | No | 82.8 |
| 4 | 29/M | M5 | Negative | CEBPA、FLT3、TET2 | N/A | No | 2 | No | Yes | 14.50 | 0/CRi | Yes | 92.3 |
| 5 | 47/F | M5 | Negative | Negative | Normal | No | 8 | Yes | No | 83.55 | 86.51/NR | No | 89.6 |
| 6 | 49/F | M5 | MLL-AF9 | ZRSR2 | N/A | No | 2 | No | No | 28.36 | 0/CR | No | 97.6 |
| 7 | 43/F | M2 | Negative | Negative | N/A | No | 10 | Yes | No | 7.12 | 0/CRi | No | 82.2 |
| 8 | 39/F | M5 | Negative | RUNX1, U2AF1 | 46, XX, + 1, der(1;7) | Yes | 4 | Yes | No | 10.24 | 2.11/CRi | Yes | 66.9 |
| 9 | 18/F | M2 | Negative | RUNX1、FLT3 | Normal | No | 6 | Yes | No | 3.09 | 0/CRi | Yes | 80.6 |
| 10 | 29/M | M5 | Negative | Negative | Normal | No | 3 | Yes | No | 22.80 | 3.02/CRi | Yes | 87.6 |
ID identification number, F female, M male, FAB French–American–British, N/A not available, MDS/MPN myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm, HSCT hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, CR complete response, CRi CR with incomplete blood count recovery
Fig. 1Kinetics of peripheral blood biomarkers and clinical outcome after CLL-1 CAR-T cell infusion. (A, B) Changes in patient body temperature and peripheral blood neutrophil numbers after CAR-T cell infusion, respectively. (C, D) Peripheral blood serum levels of IL-6, C-reactive protein (CRP) and ferritin before and after CAR-T cell infusion. (E) The ratio of CAR-T cells (CAR-T cells did not specifically distinguish between CD4 and CD8) to T cells in peripheral blood at various time periods. (F) Comparison of the peak values of CAR-T cells (CAR-T cells did not specifically distinguish between CD4 and CD8) in complete response (CR)/CRi and nonresponse (NR) patients. (G) Duration of response and survival after infusion of CLL-1 CAR-T cells. (H) Bone marrow smears of patient 4 and patient 6 before and after infusion. The data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (*p < 0.05)