Literature DB >> 35799191

First-in-human phase I study of CLL-1 CAR-T cells in adults with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Xin Jin1, Meng Zhang1, Rui Sun1,2, Hairong Lyu1, Xia Xiao1, Xiaomei Zhang1,2, Fan Li3, Danni Xie1, Xia Xiong1, Jiaxi Wang1, Wenyi Lu4, Hongkai Zhang5, Mingfeng Zhao6,7.   

Abstract

Relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has a poor prognosis. In this study, we evaluated chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy targeting CLL-1 in adults with R/R AML patients. Patients received conditioning chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) and fludarabine (30 mg/m2) for 3 days and an infusion of a dose of 1-2 × 106 CAR-T cells/kg. The incidence of dose-limiting toxicity was the primary endpoint. Ten patients were treated, and all developed cytokine release syndrome (CRS); 4 cases were low-grade, while the remaining 6 were considered high-grade CRS. No patient developed CAR-T cell-related encephalopathy syndrome (CRES). Severe pancytopenia occurred in all patients. Two patients died of severe infection due to chronic agranulocytosis. The complete response (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate was 70% (n = 7/10). The median follow-up time was 173 days (15-488), and 6 patients were alive at the end of the last follow-up. CAR-T cells showed peak expansion within 2 weeks. Notably, CLL-1 is also highly expressed in normal granulocytes, so bridging hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) may be a viable strategy to rescue long-term agranulocytosis due to off-target toxicity. In conclusion, this study is the first to demonstrate the positive efficacy and tolerable safety of CLL-1 CAR-T cell therapy in adult R/R AML.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute myeloid leukemia; C-type lectin-like molecule 1; Chimeric antigen receptor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35799191      PMCID: PMC9264641          DOI: 10.1186/s13045-022-01308-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 1756-8722            Impact factor:   23.168


To the Editor, R/R AML patients have poor long-term survival [1, 2]. T cells expressing CAR have been recognized as a promising approach for hematological malignancies [3], but the effects of CAR-T cell therapy in R/R AML are limited and need to be improved [4, 5]. Human C-type lectin-like molecule 1 (CLL-1) is expressed on malignant cells in more than 90% of AML patients, but is underexpressed in normal hematopoietic stem cells [6]. Previous studies have shown that targeting CLL-1 can treat AML in preclinical studies [7-9], and 3 of 4 children with refractory AML who received CLL-1 CAR-T cells achieved CR [10]. Here, we report the first clinical trial of CLL-1 CAR-T cells in adult patients with R/R AML, recruiting 10 patients with positive efficacy and tolerable safety after cell infusion.

Patient characteristics and CLL-1 CAR-T cell

Ten patients with relapsed/refractory AML were enrolled. The median age of all patients was 43.5 years (range 18–73), 8 of 10 patients had relapse, and 5 of them relapsed after transplantation. Three had MDS-to-AML transformation. The median of previous treatment lines was 5 (range 2–10), and all patients were resistant to the most recent chemotherapy before receiving CLL-1 CAR-T cell therapy (Table 1). The median of positive expression rate of CLL-1 in tumor cells of all patients was 85.2% (range 50.2%-97.6%). The median CAR-T cell infection efficiency was 50.53% (range 23.98%-73.14%). The median dose of infused CAR-T cells was 1.5 × 106/kg (range 1 × 106–2 × 106) (Additional file 1: Table S1).
Table 1

Characteristics of patients before CAR-T cell treatment

IDAge/SexFAB subtypeFusion geneGene mutationKaryotypeHistory of MDS/MPNPrior lines of treatmentPrevious HSCTExtramedullary invasionPre-infusion disease burden (%)Post-infusion disease burden (%)/efficacy evaluationBridged HSCTCLL-1 Positivity (%)
153/FM5NegativeKRAS、TET2、ETV646, XX, -7, + marYes6NoYes16.4371.78/NRYes50.2
244/MM2N/ANPM1、DNMT3A、IDH1、RUNX1、NRASN/ANo8NoNo13.4735.42/NRYes90.3
373/MM5NegativeRUNX1、CEBPA、TET2、ASXL1、NRAS46, XY del (7), (q22q34)Yes2NoNo18.490.23/CRiNo82.8
429/MM5NegativeCEBPA、FLT3、TET2N/ANo2NoYes14.500/CRiYes92.3
547/FM5NegativeNegativeNormalNo8YesNo83.5586.51/NRNo89.6
649/FM5MLL-AF9ZRSR2N/ANo2NoNo28.360/CRNo97.6
743/FM2NegativeNegativeN/ANo10YesNo7.120/CRiNo82.2
839/FM5NegativeRUNX1, U2AF146, XX, + 1, der(1;7)Yes4YesNo10.242.11/CRiYes66.9
918/FM2NegativeRUNX1、FLT3NormalNo6YesNo3.090/CRiYes80.6
1029/MM5NegativeNegativeNormalNo3YesNo22.803.02/CRiYes87.6

ID identification number, F female, M male, FAB French–American–British, N/A not available, MDS/MPN myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm, HSCT hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, CR complete response, CRi CR with incomplete blood count recovery

Characteristics of patients before CAR-T cell treatment ID identification number, F female, M male, FAB French–American–British, N/A not available, MDS/MPN myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm, HSCT hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, CR complete response, CRi CR with incomplete blood count recovery

Safety

Most patients developed fever during the infusion, which we consider to be an infusion-related reaction not related to CRS (Fig. 1A). The patient's fever almost always occurred in the range of 4–14 days after the infusion, which is correlated with the period of neutropenia (Fig. 1B). All patients developed CRS (Fig. 1C, D; Additional file 1: Fig. S1 A–C; Additional file 1: Table S1). CRS was controlled after 6/10 patients and 3/10 patients had received corticosteroids and tocilizumab, respectively. None of the 10 patients developed CRES. However, all patients had severe pancytopenia, 9/10 had grade 3/4 agranulocytosis, 7/10 had grade 3/4 anemia, and 7/10 had grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (Additional file 1: Tables S2, S3). Patient 2 underwent salvage hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) after achieving partial response (PR) with infusion and died of disease progression 2 months later. Patients 3 and 7 died of severe infection due to chronic agranulocytosis despite achieving CRi after therapy. Patient 5 died due to a nonresponse (NR) to treatment and rapid disease progression. Among the 6 patients who received bridging haploidentical transplantation after infusion (Fig. 1G). Granulocytes, erythroid and platelets all engrafted normally, and no serious infection occurred. Therefore, while severe agranulocytosis occurs after infusion, bridging transplantation may reverse this toxicity.
Fig. 1

Kinetics of peripheral blood biomarkers and clinical outcome after CLL-1 CAR-T cell infusion. (A, B) Changes in patient body temperature and peripheral blood neutrophil numbers after CAR-T cell infusion, respectively. (C, D) Peripheral blood serum levels of IL-6, C-reactive protein (CRP) and ferritin before and after CAR-T cell infusion. (E) The ratio of CAR-T cells (CAR-T cells did not specifically distinguish between CD4 and CD8) to T cells in peripheral blood at various time periods. (F) Comparison of the peak values of CAR-T cells (CAR-T cells did not specifically distinguish between CD4 and CD8) in complete response (CR)/CRi and nonresponse (NR) patients. (G) Duration of response and survival after infusion of CLL-1 CAR-T cells. (H) Bone marrow smears of patient 4 and patient 6 before and after infusion. The data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (*p < 0.05)

Kinetics of peripheral blood biomarkers and clinical outcome after CLL-1 CAR-T cell infusion. (A, B) Changes in patient body temperature and peripheral blood neutrophil numbers after CAR-T cell infusion, respectively. (C, D) Peripheral blood serum levels of IL-6, C-reactive protein (CRP) and ferritin before and after CAR-T cell infusion. (E) The ratio of CAR-T cells (CAR-T cells did not specifically distinguish between CD4 and CD8) to T cells in peripheral blood at various time periods. (F) Comparison of the peak values of CAR-T cells (CAR-T cells did not specifically distinguish between CD4 and CD8) in complete response (CR)/CRi and nonresponse (NR) patients. (G) Duration of response and survival after infusion of CLL-1 CAR-T cells. (H) Bone marrow smears of patient 4 and patient 6 before and after infusion. The data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (*p < 0.05)

Efficacy

7/10 patients achieved CR/CRi (Fig. 1G, H). The median follow-up time was 173 days (15–488), and 6 patients were alive at the end of the last follow-up (Table S1). Patient 1 had no response (possibly related to lower CLL-1 expression on her tumor cells) after infusion followed by salvage HSCT and achieved CR. However, she was found to have minimal residual disease (MRD) 9 months later and became MRD negative after azacytidine and venetoclax treatment. Patient 6 did not undergo other treatments after infusion, and the patient was in continuous CR during the follow-up. Six patients underwent HSCT at a median of 20 days after infusion (range: 18–34), and four (50%) were still CR at the last follow-up.

Biomarker analysis

CLL-1 CAR-T cell expansion was assessed by flow cytometry. The median CAR-T cell expansion peaked at day 12 after reinfusion (range 6–18 days) (Fig. 1E). Comparing peak CAR-T cell expansion in CR/CRi and non-CR/CRi patients, the CR/CRi patients had significantly higher proportions of CAR-T cells (Fig. 1F). Cytokine levels were increased to varying degrees after infusion (Fig. 1C, D; Fig. S1 A-C). However, in non-CR/CRi patients, the detection values ​​of cytokines and CAR-T cells were relatively low. In conclusion, CLL-1 may be a potential therapeutic target for AML. Although severe agranulocytosis may occur, CLL-1 CAR-T cell can provide R/R AML patients with the chance to achieve CR/CRi before transplantation, which may reduce the risk of relapse and prolong patient survival. Our study found that granulocytes are difficult to recover after infusion, which is inconsistent with a previous study in children [10], which may be due to the repopulating potential of hematopoietic stem cells in childhood AML patients. Additional file 1. Study methods and additional patient information.
  10 in total

1.  Long-term prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia according to the new genetic risk classification of the European LeukemiaNet recommendations: evaluation of the proposed reporting system.

Authors:  Christoph Röllig; Martin Bornhäuser; Christian Thiede; Franziska Taube; Michael Kramer; Brigitte Mohr; Walter Aulitzky; Heinrich Bodenstein; Hans-Joachim Tischler; Reingard Stuhlmann; Ulrich Schuler; Friedrich Stölzel; Malte von Bonin; Hannes Wandt; Kerstin Schäfer-Eckart; Markus Schaich; Gerhard Ehninger
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Prognostic and therapeutic role of CLEC12A in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Linde M Morsink; Roland B Walter; Gert J Ossenkoppele
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 8.250

3.  Next-Generation CAR T-cell Therapies.

Authors:  Regina M Young; Nils W Engel; Ugur Uslu; Nils Wellhausen; Carl H June
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 38.272

4.  Anti-CLL1 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Children with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Pengfei Wang; Zhuoyan Li; Yingyi He; Wenting Gan; Hua Jiang
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  CAR-T cells targeting CLL-1 as an approach to treat acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jinghua Wang; Siyu Chen; Wei Xiao; Wende Li; Liang Wang; Shuo Yang; Weida Wang; Liping Xu; Shuangye Liao; Wenjian Liu; Yang Wang; Nawei Liu; Jianeng Zhang; Xiaojun Xia; Tiebang Kang; Gong Chen; Xiuyu Cai; Han Yang; Xing Zhang; Yue Lu; Penghui Zhou
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 17.388

Review 6.  CAR T Cells for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: State of the Art and Future Directions.

Authors:  Sherly Mardiana; Saar Gill
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  Challenges and Advances in Chimeric Antigen Receptor Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Jennifer Marvin-Peek; Bipin N Savani; Oluwole O Olalekan; Bhagirathbhai Dholaria
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia with T Cells Expressing Chimeric Antigen Receptors Directed to C-type Lectin-like Molecule 1.

Authors:  Haruko Tashiro; Tim Sauer; Thomas Shum; Kathan Parikh; Maksim Mamonkin; Bilal Omer; Rayne H Rouce; Premal Lulla; Cliona M Rooney; Stephen Gottschalk; Malcolm K Brenner
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 9.  How I treat pediatric acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Gertjan J L Kaspers
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Development of A Chimeric Antigen Receptor Targeting C-Type Lectin-Like Molecule-1 for Human Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Eduardo Laborda; Magdalena Mazagova; Sida Shao; Xinxin Wang; Herlinda Quirino; Ashley K Woods; Eric N Hampton; David T Rodgers; Chan Hyuk Kim; Peter G Schultz; Travis S Young
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Characteristics of anti-CLL1 based CAR-T therapy for children with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia: the multi-center efficacy and safety interim analysis.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Chaoke Bu; Zhiyong Peng; Guangchao Li; Zhao Zhou; Wen Ding; Yongwei Zheng; Yingyi He; Zhengbin Hu; Kunlin Pei; Min Luo; Chunfu Li
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 12.883

Review 2.  Therapeutic Advances in Immunotherapies for Hematological Malignancies.

Authors:  Ayako Nogami; Koji Sasaki
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 6.208

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.