| Literature DB >> 35799173 |
Lucy Chai See Lum1, Tindivanum Muthurangam Ramanujam2, Yee Ian Yik2, Mei Ling Lee3, Soo Lin Chuah4, Emer Breen5, Anis Siham Zainal-Abidin6, Srihari Singaravel2, Conjeevaram Rajendrarao Thambidorai2, Jessie Anne de Bruyne4, Anna Marie Nathan4, Surendran Thavagnanam7, Kah Peng Eg4, Lucy Chan8, Mohamed E Abdel-Latif9,10, Chin Seng Gan4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most studies examining survival of neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) are in high-income countries. We aimed to describe the management, survival to hospital discharge rate, and factors associated with survival of neonates with unilateral CDH in a middle-income country.Entities:
Keywords: Congenital; Diaphragmatic; Hernias; Infant; Intensive care units; Newborn; Pediatric; Prenatal diagnosis; Risk factors; Survival
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35799173 PMCID: PMC9264560 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-022-03453-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pediatr ISSN: 1471-2431 Impact factor: 2.567
Demographic and perinatal characteristics of patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia
| Characteristics | |
|---|---|
| | 71 (59.2) |
| | 49 (40.8) |
| | 53 (44.2) |
| | 31 (25.8) |
| | 32 (26.7) |
| | 4 (3.3) |
| | 112 (93.3) |
| | 52 (43.3) |
| | 68 (56.7) |
| | 59 (49.2) |
| | 61 (50.8) |
| 38.1 (37–40) | |
| | 105 (89) |
| | 13 (11) |
| | 73 (60.8) |
| | 33 (27.5) |
| | 14 (11.7) |
| | 2940 (2585–3200) |
| | 59 (51.3) |
| | 86 (74.8) |
| | 7 (5.9) |
| | 12 (10.1) |
| | 2 (1–11) |
| Bochdalek | 69 (76.7) |
| Central | 5 (5.6) |
| Other | 16 (17.8) |
| | 7 (8.0) |
| | 66 (75.0) |
| | 15 (17.0) |
| | 0 (0.0) |
| | 71 (78.9) |
| | 13 (14.4) |
| | 6 (6.7) |
| | 7 (5–12) |
| | 32.5 (18.8–58.0) |
Number of cases with missing data: a2, b4, c5, d1 IQR, interquartile range
Preoperative comparisons between survivors and non-survivors to hospital discharge
| Categorical variables | Survival to hospital discharge | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 26 (32.5) | 26 (65.0) | ||
| 31 (38.8) | 28 (70.0) | ||
| 25 (31.3) | 22 (55.0) | ||
| 28 (36.8) | 28 (71.8) | ||
| 12 (15.8) | 17 (43.6) | ||
| 44 (55.0) | 2 (5.0) | ||
| 14 (60.9) | 2 (7.7) | ||
| 22 (100) | 5 (17.9) | ||
| 50 (62.5) | 36 (92.3) | ||
| 7 (9.1) | 10 (27.0) | ||
| | 69 (88.5) | 4 (40.0) | |
| | 68 (85.0) | 3(30.0) | |
| 9 (11.3) | 9 (23.1) | 0.091 | |
| FiO2 at 24 h < 50% ( | 54 (77.1) | 1(3.6) | |
| 2978 (2650–3260) | 2900 (2500–3000) | 0.692 | |
| 38.3 (37.0–40.0) | 38.0 (37.0–40.0) | 0.845 | |
| 99.0 (98.0–100.0) | 94.0 (90.5–98.5) | ||
| 88.0 (68.0–95.0) | 52.0 (91.0–98.0) | ||
| 7.3 (7.2–7.5) | 7.4 (6.9–7.2) | ||
| 53.5 (40.9–70.7) | 74.4 (54.5–112.5) | ||
| 52.1 (41.7–68.6) | 39.1 (28.2–59.3) | ||
FiO Fraction of inspired oxygen, HIPPV High-frequency intermittent positive-pressure ventilation, HFOV High-frequency oscillation ventilation, IQR Interquartile range, pCO Partial pressure of carbon dioxide, pO Partial pressure of oxygen, SpO Oxygen saturation, SD Standard deviation
Fig. 1Respiratory Care Strategy Flowchart for Neonates with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia. * = Percentage of the total number of neonates for this ventilation mode. Abbreviations: CV, conventional ventilation; HIPPV, high-frequency intermittent positive-positive ventilation; HFOV, high-frequency oscillation ventilation
Fig. 2Comparison of Oxygen Saturation Index Between Survivors and Non-Survivors in First 48 h of Admission. For each time interval the mean OSI is significantly higher among non-survivors than survivors, p ≤ 0.001. Abbreviation: OSI, oxygen saturation index
Variables predicting survival in the multivariate logistic regression model
| Variable | Odds Ratio | Confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.8 | 1.1–21.6 | ||
| Apgar score at 5 min | 6.7 | 1.2–36.3 | |
| 89.6 | 10.6–758.6 |
FiO Fraction of inspired oxygen