| Literature DB >> 35799132 |
SSenabulya F Ronny1, Nankabirwa I Joaniter2,3, Kalyesubula Robert2, Wandera Bonnie4, Kirenga Bruce2,4, Kayima James2,5, Ocama Posiano2, Bagasha Peace2,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) being the best marker for kidney function, there are no studies in sub-Saharan Africa comparing the performance of various equations used to determine eGFR. We compared prevalence of kidney disease determined by proteinuria of ≥ + 1 and or kidney disease improving global outcomes (KDIGO) eGFR criteria of < 60 ml/minute/1.73m2 determined using three creatinine-based equations among patients admitted on medical ward of Masaka Regional Referral Hospital.Entities:
Keywords: Comparison of prevalence of kidney disease; Estimated glomerular filtration rate equations; Kidney disease
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35799132 PMCID: PMC9264612 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-022-02865-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.585
Fig. 1Patient flow chart from enrollment to end of the study: Flow chart shows that 717 patients were screen, 360 excluded basing on exclusion criteria
Characteristics of the study patients
| Characteristic | Proportions (%) |
|---|---|
| 18 – 35 | 28 (20–31) |
| 36 – 59 | 47 (40–52) |
| 60 years and above | 73 (66–80) |
| Female | 168 (47.1) |
| Male | 189 (52.9) |
| Baganda | 241 (67.5) |
| Banyakitara | 52 (14.6) |
| Othersa | 64 (17.98) |
| Civil/NGO servant | 20 (5.6) |
| Operate business | 73 (20.5) |
| Peasant farmer | 177 (49.6) |
| Unemployed | 49 (13.7) |
| Othersb | 38 (10.6) |
| Born again and SDA | 33 (9.24) |
| Catholic | 202 (56.6) |
| Moslem | 78 (21.9) |
| Protestant | 44 (12.3) |
| No education | 55 (15.4) |
| Primary | 216 (60.5) |
| Secondary | 65 (18.2) |
| Tertiary | 21 (5.9) |
| Divorced/separated | 76 (21.3) |
| Married | 148 (41.4) |
| Single | 58 (16.3) |
| Widow/widower | 75 (21.0) |
Others.a: Acholi, Iteso, Basoga
Other.b: Carpenter, Builder and manual laborer
Fig. 2Comparison of prevalence of kidney disease basing on proteinuria ≥ + 1 and or KDIGO eGFR criteria of < 60 ml/min/1.73m2 calculated by various eGFR creatinine-based equations. Bar chart shows that among the 357 patients enrolled in the study, both FAS and CKD EPI 2009 without race factor equations and or proteinuria of ≥ + 1 revealed the highest overall prevalence of kidney disease at 27.2% while CKD EPI 2009 with race factor and or proteinuria of ≥ + 1 showed the lowest overall prevalence of kidney disease at 23%. N = Number of patients enrolled in the study
Fig. 3Comparison of prevalence of kidney disease using KDIGO eGFR criteria (< 60 ml/min/1.73m2) for defining CKD vs age adapted eGFR thresholds for CKD definition. Bar chart shows that KDIGO eGFR criteria of < 60 ml/min/1.73m2 for defining CKD identifies 0.3–3% slightly more patients with kidney disease than age adapted eGFR thresholds for CKD definition while using all eGFR serum creatinine-based equations. N = Number of patients enrolled in the study
Risk factors of kidney disease among study patients
| 263 (73.7) | 94 (26.3) | ||||
| 45 (30—62) | 51 (35—67) | 1.01 | 1.00—1.02 | 0.069 | |
| 18–35 | 93 (79.5) | 24 (20.5) | 1.00 | ||
| 36–59 | 97 (72.9) | 36 (27.1) | 1.44 | 0.80—2.59 | 0.227 |
| 60 years and above | 73 (68.2) | 34 (31.8) | 1.80 | 0.98—3.31 | 0.056 |
| Female | 124 (73.8) | 44 (26.2) | 1.00 | ||
| Male | 139 (73.5) | 50 (26.5) | 1.01 | 0.63—1.63 | 0.955 |
| No | 153 (72.5) | 58 (27.5) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 110 (75.3) | 36 (24.7) | 0.86 | 0.53—1.40 | 0.551 |
| No | 214 (74.3) | 74 (25.7) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 49 (71) | 20 (29) | 1.18 | 0.66—2.12 | 0.577 |
| Negative | 186 (73.5) | 67 (26.5) | 1.00 | ||
| Positive | 77 (74) | 27 (26) | 0.97 | 0.58—1.64 | 0.919 |
| No | 236 (75.2) | 78 (24.8) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 27 (62.8) | 16 (37.2) | 1.79 | 0.92—3.50 | 0.087 |
| No | 222 (77.9) | 63 (22.1) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 41 (56.9) | 31 (43.1) | 2.66 | 1.55—4.59 | < 0.001 |
| No | 117 (73.6) | 42 (26.4) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 146 (73.7) | 52 (26.3) | 0.99 | 0.62—1.59 | 0.974 |
| No | 177 (79.4) | 46 (20.6) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 86 (64.2) | 48 (35.8) | 2.15 | 1.33—3.47 | 0.002 |
| No | 235 (73.9) | 83 (26.1) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 28 (71.8) | 11 (28.2) | 1.11 | 0.53—2.33 | 0.778 |
| No | 243 (74.1) | 85 (25.9) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 20 (69) | 9 (31) | 1.29 | 0.56—2.93 | 0.549 |
| No | 258 (74.6) | 88 (25.4) | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 5 (45.5) | 6 (54.5) | 3.52 | 1.05—11.81 | 0.042 |
Fig. 4Comparison of prevalence of CKD at ≥ 90 days determined by of proteinuria ≥ 1 + and or KDIGO eGFR criteria of < 60 ml/min/1.73m2 using various eGFR serum creatinine-based equations. Bar chart shows that CKD confirmed by proteinuria ≥ + 1 and/or KDIGO eGFR criteria of < 60 ml/min/1.73m2 determined by CKD EPI 2009 without race factor identified the highest number of patients with CKD at 15.1% while CKD EPI 2009 with race factor identified the least number of patients at 12.8%
Fig. 5Comparison of prevalence of CKD after 90 days using KDIGO eGFR criteria of < 60mls/minute Vs age adapted eGFR thresholds to define CKD. Bar chart shows that KDIGO definition of CKD by eGFR < 60mls/minute/1.73m2 identifies slightly more patients with CKD than age adapted eGFR thresholds for CKD across most eGFR serum creatinine-based equations: FAS 13.5% vs 12.3%, CKD EPI 2021 14.1% vs 13.4%, CKD EPI 2009 without race 14.9% vs 13% respectively