Literature DB >> 35798881

Differentiation of bone metastases from benign red marrow depositions of the spine: the role of fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging compared to fat fraction map.

Sekyoung Park1, Jin Do Huh2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To differentiate bone metastases (BMs) from benign red marrow depositions (BRMs) of the spine using quantitative parameters derived from fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging (T2 FS) and fat fraction (FF) map
METHODS: One hundred eleven lesions, divided into 62 BMs and 49 BRMs according to MR images and either bone scan or PET-CT, were assessed with T2 FS and FF map. Two radiologists independently measured quantitative parameters from the ROIs in the lesions, including fat-suppressed (FS) T2 ratio (ratio of lesion FS T2 signal intensity [SI] to normal marrow FS T2 SI), FF, and FF ratio (ratio of lesion FF to normal marrow FF). The mean values of these parameters were compared between the two groups. To evaluate the diagnostic utilities of individual (FS T2 ratio, FF, and FF ratio) and combined parameters, ROC curves were analyzed. For the ROC curves among the individual parameters and their combinations, AUCs were compared.
RESULTS: The FS T2 ratio of BMs was significantly higher than that of BRMs (2.638 vs. 1.155 [p < 0.001]). The FF and FF ratio of BMs were significantly lower than those of BRMs (FF, 3.554% vs. 20.038% [p < 0.001]; FF ratio, 0.072 vs. 0.364 [p < 0.001]). The ROC AUCs of individual and combined parameters ranged from 0.941 to 0.980. The AUCs of all individual parameters and their combinations did not demonstrate statistically significant differences.
CONCLUSION: The FS T2 ratio, FF, and FF ratio can be useful in differentiating BMs from BRMs with or without any combination of the parameters. KEY POINTS: • Quantitative parameters derived from fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging and fat fraction map could be used to differentiate bone metastases from benign red marrow depositions with or without any combination of the parameters. • Quantitative parameters of fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging provide diagnostic performance similar to those of fat fraction map in differentiating bone metastases from benign red marrow depositions.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Differential diagnosis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Metastasis; Red marrow; Spine

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35798881     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08965-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   7.034


  32 in total

Review 1.  MRI of spinal bone marrow: part I, techniques and normal age-related appearances.

Authors:  Lubdha M Shah; Christopher J Hanrahan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  MR imaging of the spinal bone marrow.

Authors:  Michael A Tall; Adrianne K Thompson; Talia Vertinsky; Peter S Palka
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  Useful internal standards for distinguishing infiltrative marrow pathology from hematopoietic marrow at MRI.

Authors:  K W Carroll; J F Feller; P F Tirman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  Bone metastases--the clinical problem.

Authors:  R D Rubens
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 5.  Diagnosis of bone metastases: a meta-analysis comparing ¹⁸FDG PET, CT, MRI and bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  Hui-Lin Yang; Tao Liu; Xi-Ming Wang; Yong Xu; Sheng-Ming Deng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Bone marrow imaging.

Authors:  J B Vogler; W A Murphy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Radiological imaging for the diagnosis of bone metastases.

Authors:  L D Rybak; D I Rosenthal
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-03

8.  MR imaging of bone marrow lesions: relative conspicuousness on T1-weighted, fat-suppressed T2-weighted, and STIR images.

Authors:  S A Mirowitz; P Apicella; W R Reinus; A M Hammerman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  Fat-suppression techniques for 3-T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  Filippo Del Grande; Francesco Santini; Daniel A Herzka; Michael R Aro; Cooper W Dean; Garry E Gold; John A Carrino
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

10.  MRI of bone metastases: the choice of the sequence.

Authors:  Daniel Vanel
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2004-03-23       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.