| Literature DB >> 35795614 |
Abstract
In order to observe the effect of MRI image scanning on shoulder pain caused by volleyball training injury, this paper proposes to analyze the value of MR arthrography and conventional MRI image scanning in the diagnosis of shoulder injury. Taking the female volleyball players in a no. 1 middle school for nearly ten years as the research object, the injury investigation and statistics were carried out. The shoulder joint injury was investigated using arthroscopy and no injury was found. All patients underwent MR arthrography and routine MRI image scanning after admission. All patients underwent MR arthrography and routine MRI image scanning after admission. The patient took the flat lying position and put their arms flat on both sides of the body, and the Philips Achieva 3.0T MRI image scanning and Sense Flex M soft coil for MRI image scanning detection were used. The plain scan included oblique sagittal, axial, and oblique coronal proton density weighted image sequences; echo chain ETL = 6, TR/TE 2300/25 ms; and oblique sagittal and oblique coronal SET1W1; TRTE is 400/10 ms. Comparison was made with regard to the sensitivity, specificity, Jordan index, and accuracy of MR arthrography versus conventional MRI imaging in the diagnosis of shoulder injuries. The results were 38 true positives, 19 true negatives, 1 false positive, and 2 false negatives; a normal MRI scan showed 33 true positives, 13 true negatives, 7 false positives, and 7 false negatives. MR arthrography is more accurate than MRI image scanners in the diagnosis of shoulder injuries.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35795614 PMCID: PMC9152345 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4368871
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Scanning ISSN: 0161-0457 Impact factor: 1.750
Figure 1Composition of MRI imaging system.
Statistics of injury parts of volleyball players.
| Damage site | Number of injured | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Ankle joint | 36 | 60 |
| Knee joint | 33 | 55 |
| Waist | 27 | 45 |
| Finger joint | 27 | 45 |
| Shoulder joint | 24 | 40 |
| Foot | 9 | 15 |
| Arm | 6 | 10 |
| Lower leg | 3 | 5 |
Statistics of volleyball injury types of volleyball players.
| Damage type | Number of injured (person) | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Joint sprain | 24 | 40 |
| Muscle strain | 12 | 20 |
| Lumbar muscle degeneration | 12 | 20 |
| Scratch | 6 | 10 |
| Fracture | 3 | 5 |
| Other | 3 | 5 |
Statistics of volleyball injury types of volleyball players.
| Damage property | Number of injured (person) | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Chronic injury | 30 | 50 |
| Acute injury | 30 | 50 |
Statistics of volleyball injury types of volleyball players.
| Cause of damage | Number of injured (person) | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Errors in detail actions | 42 | 70 |
| Unscientific preparation activities | 33 | 55 |
| Seasonal environmental factors | 24 | 40 |
| Site equipment factors | 21 | 35 |
| Excessive exercise load | 15 | 25 |
| Lack of awareness of sports injury protection | 12 | 20 |
| Poor physical fitness | 9 | 15 |
| Lack of muscle strength | 9 | 15 |
| Unscientific recovery after injury | 6 | 10 |
| Poor physical and psychological state | 6 | 10 |
Figure 2Comparison of MR arthrography and conventional MRI diagnosis results.
Comparison of various indexes of MR arthrography and conventional MRI in the diagnosis of shoulder injury.
| Diagnosis mode | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | Jordan index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRI | 85% | 80.47% | 83.1% | 0.6761% |
| MR arthrography | 95% | 96.26% | 95.48% | 0.9348% |
|
| 1.945 | 3.489 | 6.522 | / |
|
| 0.159 | 0.05 | 0.022 | / |