| Literature DB >> 35795463 |
Ilaria Carmosino1, Silvia Bonardi1, Martina Rega1, Andrea Luppi2, Luca Lamperti1, Maria Cristina Ossiprandi3, Cristina Bacci1.
Abstract
The European Food Safety Authority and European Centre of Disease Prevention and Control antimicrobial resistance report published in 2021 shows increasing levels of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella against antibiotics of choice for human salmonellosis (s-lactams and fluoroquinolones). The aim of the study was to follow the evolution of resistance against some Critical Important Antimicrobials in Salmonella isolates from fresh pork collected in Emilia-Romagna region, northern Italy, over two decades. Emilia-Romagna region is characterized by production of well-known pork derived products, as Parma Ham. The samples were collected in three different periods, ranging from 2000 to 2003, 2012 to 2016 and 2018 to 2021. After serotyping, the isolates were phenotypically tested for resistance to three classes of antibiotics: s-lactams, fluoroquinolones and polymyxins. End-point polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and PCRReal Time were used for genotypical analyses. The phenotypical resistance to s-lactams and fluoroquinolones were clearly increasing when comparing the results obtained from isolates collected in the first period (16.7% and 16.7%, respectively) with those of the third period (29.7% and 32.4%, respectively). On the contrary, the resistance to colistin decreased from 33.3% to 5.4%. Genotypically, the 71.4% and 83.3% of the strains harboured s-lactams and fluoroquinolones genes, respectively, while colistin resistance genes were not detected in the phenotypically resistant strains. ©Copyright: the Author(s).Entities:
Keywords: Salmonella; ciprofloxacin; colistin; pork; s-lactams
Year: 2022 PMID: 35795463 PMCID: PMC9251873 DOI: 10.4081/ijfs.2022.9972
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ital J Food Saf ISSN: 2239-7132
Antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella isolates from pork samples.
| Sampling period | No. of food samples | No. of isolates (%) | No. phenotypically resistant isolates (%) | No. genotypically resistant isolates (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 87 | 12 (13.8) | 7/12 (58.3) | 3/7 (42.8) |
| B | 1067 | 82 (7.7) | 36/82 (43.9) | 13/36 (36.1) |
| C | 315 | 37 (11.7) | 17/37 (45.9) | 13/17 (76.5) |
| Total | 1469 | 131 (8.9) | 60/131 (45.8) | 29/60 (48.3) |
Phenotypically and genotypically resistant Salmonella isolates to different antibiotics.
| Sampling period | β-lactams | Fluoroquinolones | Colistin | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phenotypic | Genotypic | Phenotypic | Genotypic | Phenotypic | Genotypic | |
| Profile (%) | Profile (%) | Profile (%) | Profile (%) | Profile (%) | Profile (%) | |
| A | 2/12 (16.7) | 2/2(100) | 2/12 (16.7) | 2/2(100) | 4/12 (33.3) | - |
| B | 15/82 (18.3) | 9/15(60) | 4/82 (4.8) | 4/4(100) | 24/82 (29.3) | - |
| C | 11/37 (29.7) | 9/11 (81.8) | 12/37 (32.4) | 9/12(75) | 2/37 (5.4) | - |
| Total | 28/131 (21.4) | 20/28 (71.4) | 18/131 (13.7) | 15/18 (83.3) | 30/131 (22.9) | - |
Antibiotic resistance pattern in S. Derby and S. Typhimurium.
| Sampling period | No. isolates | No. resistant strains | AMR phenotypic pattern | AMR genotypic pattern | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. Derby | |||||
| A | 3 | 1 | ESBL+AmpC |
| |
| 1 | NAL |
| |||
| B | 24 | 1 | ESBL |
| |
| 1 | ESBL |
| |||
| 2 | ESBL | - | |||
| 3 | ESBL +COL |
| |||
| 1 | NAL |
| |||
| 1 | NAL+COL |
| |||
| 1 | COL | - | |||
| C | 8 | 2 | ESBL | - | |
| S. Typhimurium | |||||
| B | 29 | 2 | ESBL | - | |
| 7 | COL | - | |||
| 1 | ESBL+COL |
| |||
| 1 | ESBL+COL |
| |||
| C | 22 | 2 | COL | - | |
| 1 | ESBL+CIPRO |
| |||
| 1 | ESBL+CIPRO |
| |||
| 1 | ESBL+CIPRO |
| |||
| 1 | ESBL+CIPRO |
| |||
| 2 | ESBL+CIPRO |
| |||
| 1 | ESBL+CIPRO |
| |||
| 2 | CIPRO+NAL |
| |||
| 2 | CIPRO+NAL |
| |||
Antibiotic resistance pattern in several serovars.
| Sampling period | No. of isolates | No. of resistant isolates | AMR phenotypic pattern | AMR genotypic pattern | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Enteritidis | 2 | 2 | COL | - |
| Tennessee | 3 | 1 | ESBL + NAL |
| |
| 1 | COL | - | |||
| Blockey | 1 | 1 | COL | - | |
| Dublin | 2 | 0 | - | - | |
| Thompson | 1 | 0 | - | - | |
| B | Anatum | 4 | 1 | ESBL | - |
| 3 | COL | - | |||
| London | 7 | 3 | COL | - | |
| Bredeney | 8 | 2 | ESBL |
| |
| 3 | COL | ||||
| 1 | ESBL+COL | - | |||
| Virchow | 4 | 1 | NAL |
| |
| Typhimurium Monophasic | 4 | 1 - | CIPRO+NAL - | ||
| Agona | 2 | - | - | - | |
| C | Rissen | 5 | 1 | ESBL |
|
| Infantis | 2 | 1 | ESBL+CIPRO+NAL |
| |