| Literature DB >> 35795373 |
Shao-Jung Li1,2,3,4, Wan-Li Cheng2,3,4, Yu-Hsun Kao3,4,5,6, Cheng-Chih Chung3,4,7,8, Nguyen Ngoc Trang9, Yi-Jen Chen3,4,5,7,8.
Abstract
Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is linked to high mortality. Melatonin inhibits nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB)/cyclic AMP response element-binding protein (CREB), contributing to CAVD progression. This study determined the role of melatonin/MT1/MT2 signaling in valvular interstitial cell (VIC) calcification. Western blotting and Alizarin red staining were used to analyze NF-κB/CREB/runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) signaling in porcine VICs treated with an osteogenic (OST) medium without (control) or with melatonin for 5 days. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay was used to analyze NF-κB's transcription regulation of NF-κB on the Runx2 promoter. OST medium-treated VICs exhibited a greater expression of NF-κB, CREB, and Runx2 than control VICs. Melatonin treatment downregulated the effects of the OST medium and reduced VIC calcification. The MT1/MT2 antagonist (Luzindole) and MT1 receptor neutralized antibody blocked the anticalcification effect of melatonin, but an MT2-specific inhibitor (4-P-PDOT) did not. Besides, the NF-κB inhibitor (SC75741) reduced OST medium-induced VIC calcification to a similar extent to melatonin at 10 nmol/L. The ChIP assay demonstrated that melatonin attenuated OST media increased NF-κB binding activity to the promoter region of Runx2. Activation of the melatonin/MT1-axis significantly reduced VIC calcification by targeting the NF-κB/CREB/Runx2 pathway. Targeting melatonin/MT1 signaling may be a potential therapeutic strategy for CAVD.Entities:
Keywords: NF-κB; calcific aortic valve disease; cyclic AMP response element-binding protein; melatonin; osteogenesis; runt-related transcription factor 2; valvular interstitial cell
Year: 2022 PMID: 35795373 PMCID: PMC9251177 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.885293
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1Effect of melatonin on VIC calcification. (A) The representative Alizarin red S staining of VICs with or without melatonin (10 nmol/L). We quantified the positive stain area (red color) per field (three fields per treatment) in the VICs (n = 5). The right panel presents the summary data of the percentage of calcification area (n = 5). ***P < 0.005. (B) Western blotting for melatonin on Runx2 protein expression in OST medium treated VICs for five days (n = 5). β-actin was used as an internal control. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. OST, osteogenic medium; Mel, melatonin. * P < 0.05, *** P < 0.005.
Figure 2Effect of melatonin on NF-κB and CREB signaling. (A–C) Representative Western blots and summary data for the effect of melatonin on pNF-κB and NF-κB protein expression in OST medium-treated VICs with or without melatonin (10 nmol/L) administration for 5 days (n = 7). β-actin was used as an internal control. (D–F) Representative Western blots and summary data for the effect of melatonin on the levels of pCREB and CREB in OST medium treated VICs with or without melatonin (10 nmol/L) for 5 days (n = 6). β-actin was used as an internal control. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. OST, osteogenic medium; Mel, melatonin. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Figure 3Effect of melatonin and SC75741 on VIC calcification. The left panel depicts representative Alizarin red S staining of VICs with or without melatonin (10 nmol/L) or with or without SC75741 (0.2 and 1 μmol/L). We quantified the positive stain area (red color) per field (three fields per treatment) in the VICs (n = 5). The right panel presents the summary data of the percentage of calcification area (n = 5). OST vs. OST + Mel 10 nM +SC75741 1 μM: P = 0.001. OST vs. OST + Mel 10 nM: P = 0.015. OST vs. OST + SC75741 1 μM: P = 0.026. OST vs. OST + Mel 10 nM + SC75741 0.2 μM: P = 0.027. OST vs. negative control: P = 0.032. OST, osteogenic medium; Mel, melatonin; SC, SC75741; *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.005.
Figure 4The left panel depicts representative Alizarin red S staining of VICs with or without melatonin (10 μmol/L); with or without Luzindole (1μmol/L); or with or without 4-P-PDOT (1 μmol/L). The positively stained area (red color) was quantified using ImageJ. We quantified the stain-positive area ratio per field (three fields per sample) in the VICs (n = 8). The right panel presents the average data of the percentage of calcification area (n = 8). OST vs. OST + Mel 10 nM: P = 0.001. OST vs. negative control: P = 0.005. OST vs. OST + Mel 10nM + 4-P-PDOT 1 μM: P = 0.008. OST + Mel 10 nM vs. OST + Mel 10 nM + Luzindole 1 μM: P = 0.008. OST + Mel 10 nM + Luzindole 1 μM vs. negative control: P = 0.028. OST + Mel 10 nM + Luzindole 1 μM vs. OST + Mel 10 nM + 4-P-PDOT 1 μM: P = 0.043. OST, osteogenic medium; Mel, melatonin. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.005.
Figure 5Effect of MT1 neutralized antibody on melatonin-attenuated VIC calcification. The left panel depicts representative Alizarin red S staining of VICs with or without melatonin (10 nmol/L) or with or without MT1 neutralized antibody (MT1 Ab, 0.5, 1 and 2 μg/mL) or control IgG (0.5, 1 and 2 μg/mL). We quantified the positive stain area (red color) per field (three fields per treatment) in the VICs (n = 4). The right panel presents the summary data of the percentage of calcification area (n = 4). Control (Con) vs OST: P = 0.002; OST vs. OST + Mel 10nM: P = 0.003; OST + Mel 10nM vs. OST + Mel 10nM + MT1 Ab 1 μg/mL: P = 0.027; Con vs. OST + Mel 10nM + MT1 Ab 1 μg/mL: 0.016; OST + Mel 10nM vs. OST + Mel 10nM + MT1 Ab 2 μg/mL: P = 0.012; Con vs. OST + Mel 10nM + MT1 Ab 2 μg/mL. P = 0.007. OST, osteogenic medium; Mel, melatonin; MT1, Melatonin receptor 1. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005.
Figure 6NF-κB-binding activity on the promoter region of Runx2 was determined by a ChIP assay (A) Schematic of the PCR amplification site of Runx2 promoter regions (B) Representative PCR products and summary data after ChIP assay (n = 4). We retained 1% of total DNA as the input control DNA. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. OST, osteogenic medium; Mel, melatonin. ** P < 0.01.
Figure 7Schematic of the potential mechanisms for the therapeutic effects of melatonin on osteogenesis in VICs. The melatonin/MT1 axis may downregulate Runx2 expression through inactivation of NF-κB/CREB signaling in OST medium-treated VICs. Conversely, activation of the NF-κB/CREB complex may bind to the Runx2 promoter to increase Runx2 gene transcription through VIC osteogenesis.