| Literature DB >> 35795333 |
Xisi Guan1, Zhe Wang1, Qiuming He1, Junjian Lv1, Jiakang Yu1, Wei Zhong1.
Abstract
Background: Delayed diagnosis and inaccurate judgment of the severity of the disease may be the principal reasons for the poor prognosis associated with neonatal midgut volvulus. We aimed to develop a nomogram model that timely assesses the risks of intestinal ischemia and necrosis in the neonate with midgut volvulus. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: intestinal ischemia and necrosis; midgut volvulus; neonate; nomogram; risk factors
Year: 2022 PMID: 35795333 PMCID: PMC9251320 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.888594
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pediatr ISSN: 2296-2360 Impact factor: 3.569
FIGURE 1A flowchart displaying the process of building the nomogram.
Analyses of clinical and laboratory parameters in midgut volvulus.
| Variables | Intestinal | Non-intestinal |
|
|
| |||
| Male sex, | 13 (61.90%) | 67 (77.01%) | 0.156 |
| Preterm births (< 37 weeks), | 4 (19.05%) | 5 (5.75%) | 0.07 |
| Cesarean sections, | 8 (38.10%) | 23 (26.44%) | 0.289 |
| Gestational weight (kg)* | 2.96 (2.45,3.16) | 3.03 (2.8,3.35) | 0.050 |
| Age at admission (d)* | 4 (2,6) | 8 (5,11) | 0.003 |
| Age at onset (d)* | 1 (1,4) | 2 (1,5) | 0.182 |
|
| |||
| Bilious vomiting | 15 (71.43%) | 85 (97.70%) |
|
| Hematochezia | 2 (9.52%) | 2 (2.30%) | 0.169 |
| Abdominal distention | 2 (9.52%) | 0 (0.00%) |
|
|
| |||
| Heart rate* | 153 (140,164) | 140 (130,146) |
|
| MAP (mmHg)* | 62 (58.67,70.67) | 54 (50.67,60.33) |
|
| RR* | 45 (41,48) | 44 (40,46) | 0.346 |
|
| |||
| Lactic acid (mmol/L)* | 4.00 (2.80,4.70) | 3.50 (2.50,4.90) | 0.41 |
| HGB (g/L)** | 115.71 ± 30.21 | 146.79 ± 25.37 |
|
| Leukocyte (109/L)* | 15.80 (10.60,20.70) | 10.70 (8.80,13.50) |
|
| CRP (mg/L)* | 57.05 (10,84.80) | 1.34 (0.51,4.59) |
|
| Glucose (mmol/L)* | 6.00 (5.20,7.30) | 4.87 (4.12,5.90) |
|
| Albumin (g/L)* | 34.70 (31.30,36.20) | 38.80 (35.90,42.10) |
|
| K(mmol/L)** | 4.80 ± 0.80 | 3.92 ± 0.54 |
|
| Na (mmol/L)** | 134.20 ± 3.40 | 136.53 ± 4.19 |
|
| PH** | 7.37 ± 0.11 | 7.46 ± 0.07 |
|
| BE (mmol/L)** | −4.14 ± 5.21 | −1.05 ± 4.34 |
|
|
| 2 (9.52%) | 0 (0.00%) |
|
|
| |||
| Days from symptoms to operation (d)* | 1.00 (0.75,3.00) | 7.00 (4.00,12.00) |
|
*Median (P25, P75) ** Mean (SD). BE, base excess; CRP, C-reactive protein; HGB, Hemoglobin; MAP, mean arterial pressure; RR, respiratory rate. Significant p values (p < 0.05) are bolded.
Multivariate logistic regression model of intestinal necrosis.
| Variables | B | SE |
| OR (95%CI) |
| Intercept | 132.79 | 54.389 | 0.015 | – |
| HR, time/min | 0.116 | 0.054 | 0.032 | 1.123 (1.010–1.249) |
| MAP, mmHg | 0.116 | 0.059 | 0.050 | 1.123 (1.000–1.261) |
| CRP, mg/L | 0.076 | 0.025 | 0.003 | 1.079 (1.027–1.134) |
| Na, mmol/L | –0.435 | 0.199 | 0.029 | 0.647 (0.438–0.956) |
| ALB, g/L | –0.342 | 0.14 | 0.014 | 0.710 (0.540–0.933) |
| pH value × 10–1 | –1.317 | 0.636 | 0.038 | 0.268 (0.077–0.931) |
ALB, albumin; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C-reactive protein; MAP, mean arterial pressure; OR, odds ratio.
FIGURE 2A receiver operating characteristic curve of the logistic regression model for predicting intestinal ischemia and necrosis caused by midgut volvulus.
FIGURE 3A nomogram model for predicting intestinal ischemia and necrosis in neonates with midgut volvulus.
FIGURE 4The correction curve for the nomogram model.