| Literature DB >> 35795220 |
Yong Wang1,2,3, Jie Yang1,2,3, Zhiwei Wang1,2,3, Xiaofei Kong1,2,3, Xiangyu Sun4, Jingjing Tian1,2, Xiushuo Zhang1,2,3, Xiaolong Zhao1,2, Yanping Liu1,2,3, Hongsheng Li1,2,3, Yuqing Su1,2,3, Xiaorui Hao1,2, Jing Xu1,2.
Abstract
Micro-Nano optics is one of the most active frontiers in the current development of optics. It combines the cutting-edge achievements of photonics and nanotechnology, which can realize many brand-new functions on the basis of local electromagnetic interactions and become an indispensable key science and technology of the 21st century. Micro-Nano optics is also an important development direction of the new optoelectronics industry at present. It plays an irreplaceable role in optical communication, optical interconnection, optical storage, sensing imaging, sensing measurement, display, solid-state lighting, biomedicine, security, green energy, and other fields. In this paper, we will summarize the research status of micro-nano optics, and analyze it from four aspects: micro-nano luminescent materials and devices, micro-nano optical waveguide materials and devices, micro-nano photoelectric detection materials and devices, and micro-nano optical structures and devices. Finally, the future development of micro-nano optics will be prospected.Entities:
Keywords: luminescent materials; micro-nano optics; optical waveguides; photoelectric detection; review; structures
Year: 2022 PMID: 35795220 PMCID: PMC9251314 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.916553
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.545
FIGURE 1(A) Excitation and emission spectra. 1) 1 mol% Ce3+ doped, 2) 1 mol% Ce3+ and 0.5 mol% Tb3+ doped, 3) 1 mol% Ce3+ doped and 0.5 mol% Tb3+ coated Na(Y1.5Na0.5)F6 nanocrystals. (B) Energy level diagram for electronic transitions and energy transfer process of Na(Y1.5Na0.5)F6:Ce:Tb (Ghosh et al., 2010).
FIGURE 2Morphology of Na(Y1.5Na0.5)F6:Ce. (A) Low magnification TEM images of 75 C dried Na(Y1.5Na0.5)F6:Ce (1) doped nanorods, (B) 75 C dried sonicated Na(Y1.5Na0.5)F6:Ce (1) doped nanoparticles, (C) core-shell NaYF4:Ce (1)/Tb nanoparticles. (D) Schematic diagram of morphology change (Ghosh et al., 2010).
FIGURE 3Excitation spectra (A) and emission spectra (B) of LaF3:Eu3+ with different Eu3+-doping concentration (Gulina et al., 2017).
FIGURE 4Emission spectra of β-NaLaF4:Eu3+, Gd3+ red nanomaterials with different Gd3+-doping concentration (Nie et al., 2017).
FIGURE 5(A) Schematic illustration of the configuration, (B) PL spectra (Inset shows a photograph of the device) and (C) CIE color coordinate of the CsPbBr3/SiO2 based WLED (Li et al., 2015).
FIGURE 6(A) Schematic diagram of energy transfer in NaYF4:Yb3+, Nb3+, and Tm3+NPs, (B) the core/shell structure of NaYF4:Yb3+, Nb3+@CaF2NPs, (C) optical and NIR images of C57BL/6 mice and NaYF4:Yb3+, Nb3+@CaF2 (George et al., 2013).
FIGURE 7Emission spectra of LMOF-241 with the incremental addition of aflatoxin (Tan et al., 2018).
FIGURE 8(A) MGM photodector with heterogeneous metal interdigital electrode (Mueller et al., 2010); (B) BP mid infrared detector integrated interdigital electrode (Guo et al., 2016). (Neto et al., 2007)
FIGURE 9(A) Photodetector based on ferroelectric polymer and MoS2 (Wang et al., 2015b). (B) Photodetector based on ferroelectric polymer and MoTe2 (Huang et al., 2016b). (C) Plasmonic microcavity integrated graphene photodetector (Wang et al., 2020). (D) Cross-sectional schematic of the graphene photodetector with split gates and a nano disk (Wang et al., 2020).
FIGURE 10(A) 2D-PC thin film point defect structure; (B) Relationship between transmittance and pressure (Zhao, 2015).
FIGURE 11(A) Schematic of a 2D-PC sensor formed by polymerizing a PNIPAAm hydrogel onto a single-layer microsphere array. The PNIPAAm hydrogel swells after binding to the surfactant molecule, and the ball spacing increases, resulting in diffraction red-shift; (B) The normalized diffraction spectrum of the 2D-PC PNIPAAm sensor in aqueous solution of sodium dodecylsulfonate (SDS) at different concentrations; (C) The diffraction wavelength to the SDS concentration response and corresponding color change (Zhang et al., 2012).
FIGURE 122D-PC material with invisible markings: (A) colorless and transparent when dehydrated; (B) PC film with blue and green when rehydrated; (C) colorless and transparent when dehydrated; (D) The PC film turned green while the printed part showed red (Chen et al., 2017b).