Will K M Kieffer1, Angus Don2, Antony Field3, Peter A Robertson2. 1. Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Canada Avenue, Redhill, RH1 5RH, Surrey, UK. will.kieffer@nhs.net. 2. Auckland City Hospital, 2 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand. 3. Auckland City Hospital and Starship Hospital, 2 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To establish whether common degenerative lumbar spine conditions have a predictable sagittal profile and associated range of lordosis. The spinopelvic balance of a normal population and normal ranges are well described in the literature. There is also evidence that certain degenerative conditions can lead to a preponderance of loss of lordosis at specific spinal levels. There is limited literature on the range and magnitude of loss of lordosis for known degenerative lumbar spine pathologies. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively obtained radiographs from a dual surgeon database was performed and imaging analysed for spinopelvic parameters. Degenerative conditions studied were; Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (L3/4 and L4/5 analysed separately), L5/S1 degenerative disc disease, L5/S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis. Pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, segmental and global lumbar lordosis, vertebral lordosis and lumbar vertical axis were measured. RESULTS: The range of change in segmental lordosis was normally distributed for all studied degenerative spinal conditions except L5/S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis. L5/S1 degenerative disc disease affected younger adults (mean age 37), whilst degenerative spondylolisthesis at L3/4 and L4/5 affected older adults (mean ages 69.5 and 68.9 respectively). Removing an outlying high-grade L5/S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis made the data distribution approach a normal distribution. CONCLUSION: Most degenerative spinal pathologies cause a normally distributed spectrum of deformity which should be addressed and corrected with a tailored, individualised surgical plan for each patient. Universal treatment recommendations should be interpreted with caution.
PURPOSE: To establish whether common degenerative lumbar spine conditions have a predictable sagittal profile and associated range of lordosis. The spinopelvic balance of a normal population and normal ranges are well described in the literature. There is also evidence that certain degenerative conditions can lead to a preponderance of loss of lordosis at specific spinal levels. There is limited literature on the range and magnitude of loss of lordosis for known degenerative lumbar spine pathologies. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively obtained radiographs from a dual surgeon database was performed and imaging analysed for spinopelvic parameters. Degenerative conditions studied were; Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (L3/4 and L4/5 analysed separately), L5/S1 degenerative disc disease, L5/S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis. Pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, segmental and global lumbar lordosis, vertebral lordosis and lumbar vertical axis were measured. RESULTS: The range of change in segmental lordosis was normally distributed for all studied degenerative spinal conditions except L5/S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis. L5/S1 degenerative disc disease affected younger adults (mean age 37), whilst degenerative spondylolisthesis at L3/4 and L4/5 affected older adults (mean ages 69.5 and 68.9 respectively). Removing an outlying high-grade L5/S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis made the data distribution approach a normal distribution. CONCLUSION: Most degenerative spinal pathologies cause a normally distributed spectrum of deformity which should be addressed and corrected with a tailored, individualised surgical plan for each patient. Universal treatment recommendations should be interpreted with caution.
Authors: W Brinjikji; F E Diehn; J G Jarvik; C M Carr; D F Kallmes; M H Murad; P H Luetmer Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-09-10 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Yamaan S Saadeh; Jacob R Joseph; Brandon W Smith; Michael J Kirsch; Amr M Sabbagh; Paul Park Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2019-03-20 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Sebastien Pesenti; Renaud Lafage; Daniel Stein; Jonathan C Elysee; Lawrence G Lenke; Frank J Schwab; Han Jo Kim; Virginie Lafage Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Mohamed Elmekaty; Yoshihisa Kotani; Emad El Mehy; Yohan Robinson; Ahmed El Tantawy; Ivan Sekiguchi; Ryo Fujita Journal: Asian Spine J Date: 2018-09-10
Authors: Kelvin J Murray; Michael R Le Grande; Arantxa Ortega de Mues; Michael F Azari Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 2.362