Literature DB >> 35794229

Clinical impact of and microbiological risk factors for qacA/B positivity in ICU-acquired ST5-methicillin-resistant SCCmec type II Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Haein Kim1, Sunghee Park1, Hyeonji Seo1, Hyemin Chung1, Eun Sil Kim1,2, Heungsup Sung3, Mi-Na Kim3, Seongman Bae1, Jiwon Jung1, Min Jae Kim1, Sung-Han Kim1, Sang-Oh Lee1, Sang-Ho Choi1, Yang Soo Kim1, Yong Pil Chong4.   

Abstract

Concern about resistance to chlorhexidine has increased due to the wide use of the latter. The impact of the qacA/B and smr chlorhexidine tolerance genes on the outcome of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections is unclear. We evaluated the prevalence and clinical impact of, and microbiological risk factors for, qacA/B tolerance in MRSA bacteremia. MRSA bacteremia that occurred more than two days after intensive care unit admission between January 2009 and December 2018 was identified from a prospective cohort of S. aureus bacteremia in a tertiary-care hospital from South Korea. A total of 183 MRSA blood isolates was identified, and the major genotype found was ST5-MRSA-II (87.4%). The prevalences of qacA/B and smr were 67.2% and 3.8%, respectively. qacA/B-positive isolates were predominantly ST5-MRSA-II (96.7% [119/123]), the dominant hospital clone. In a homogenous ST5-MRSA-II background, qacA/B positivity was independently associated with septic shock (aOR, 4.85), gentamicin resistance (aOR, 74.43), and non-t002 spa type (aOR, 74.12). qacA/B positivity was found to have decreased significantly in ST5-MRSA-II in association with a decline in qacA/B-positive t2460, despite the increasing use of chlorhexidine since 2010 (P < 0.001 for trend). Continuous surveillance of the qac genes, and molecular characterization of their plasmids, are needed to understand their role in MRSA epidemiology.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35794229      PMCID: PMC9259651          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-15546-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.996


Introduction

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the most common causes of healthcare-associated infection. It leads to increased morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs). In the United States, the rate of hospital-acquired Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia was 31% and had decreased by 1.9% annually from 1995 to 2015. However, the frequency of metastatic complications of S. aureus bacteremia has increased by 0.9% per year, and the overall mortality rate is still high at 26.5%[1]. In South Korea, the hospital-acquired S. aureus bacteremia rate was 56% and had decreased by 2.4% annually from 2008 to 2018, and the 90-day mortality rate was 27% in 2018. The proportion of MRSA in S. aureus bacteremia was 52%, with a decrease of 1.6% annually[2]. Infection control strategies to minimize MRSA infection include education about hand washing, various MRSA bundles, and chlorhexidine bathing with or without topical nasal mupirocin application[3,4]. Chlorhexidine bathing is estimated to reduce MRSA colonization and bacteremia in the ICU by 41% and 36%, respectively[5]. While there is benefit from chlorhexidine bathing and nasal mupirocin application, concern persists about the potential emergence of increased resistance due to antiseptic exposure. The qacA and qacB genes encode multidrug efflux pumps associated with chlorhexidine tolerance[6,7]. Several studies have shown an increase in the proportion of these genes after the widespread use of chlorhexidine in hospitals[8-10]. In addition, the presence of the qacA or qacB (qacA/B) gene has been linked to resistance to gentamicin, clindamycin, and penicillin, as well as to a high vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC)[11-13]. Previous studies have shown an association between qacA/B positivity and specific MRSA genotypes, including ST5- and ST239-MRSA[6,7,14]. ST5-MRSA is a major hospital MRSA clone in South Korea, while ST72-MRSA is a community-associated MRSA[2]. Because ST5-MRSA is associated with higher mortality and more accessory gene regulator (agr) dysfunctional than ST72-MRSA[15,16], clinical and microbiological risk factors for qacA/B positivity might be affected by the characteristics of specific genotypes. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and clinical impact of, and microbiological risk factors for, qacA/B positivity in MRSA bacteremia in a homogenous genotype background after the implementation of chlorhexidine use in a tertiary hospital from South Korea.

Methods

Study population and design

A retrospective analysis of a prospective observational cohort of patients with S. aureus bacteremia was conducted at the Asan Medical Center, a 2700-bed tertiary care hospital with 118 adult ICU beds, in Seoul, South Korea. All consecutive adult patients (≥ 16 years old) who had MRSA bacteremia that developed more than two days after ICU admission between January 2009 and December 2018 were identified, and only patients whose MRSA isolates were collected and available for laboratory tests were included in the study[17]. Only the initial episode of MRSA bacteremia in any given patient was included. Recurrence of S. aureus bacteremia more than three months from the first bacteremia episode was regarded as a new episode and included in the analysis. To evaluate the clinical impact of qacA/B positivity in a single genotypic background, multilocus sequence typing (MLST) of the MRSA isolates was performed. The clinical, microbiological, and genotypic characteristics of qacA/B-positive MRSA isolates, and risk factors for qacA/B positivity, were analyzed. Treatment outcome of bacteremia was evaluated based on 14-day, 30-day, and 12-week all-cause mortality. This study was approved by the Asan Medical Center Institutional Review Board (IRB number: 2008-0274). The requirement for written informed consent was waived by the Asan Medical Center Institutional Review Board, given the observational nature of the study. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Study definitions

The prognosis for the underlying disease was classified according to the system of McCabe and Jackson as rapidly fatal (when death was expected within a few months), ultimately fatal (when death was expected within 4 years), and nonfatal (when life expectancy was > 4 years)[18]. Charlson’s comorbidity index was used to measure comorbid burden[19]. The severity of bacteremia was measured by the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score and the Pitt bacteremia score[20]. Sites of infection causing MRSA bacteremia were defined according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria[21]. Catheter-related infection was defined according to the Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines[22].

Microbiological data and determination of genotypes

All S. aureus isolates were identified by standard methods. Antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined with a MicroScan (Dade Behring, West Sacramento, CA, USA) and the standard criteria of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)[23]. Methicillin resistance was confirmed by detection of the mecA gene by PCR. Vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by the vancomycin E-test (AB Biodisk, Piscataway, NJ, USA) on Mueller–Hinton agar. Heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA) was detected by population analysis profiling, as previously described[24]. Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec (SCCmec) type, MLST, and Staphylococcus protein A (spa) typing, as well as agr genotyping, were performed as described elsewhere[25-28]. MLST allele numbers and sequence types (STs) are available in the MLST database (http://www.mlst.net). agr dysfunction was detected by δ-hemolysin production[29]. Chlorhexidine MIC was determined by the broth microdilution test described by CLSI[30]. Chlorhexidine digluconate 20% aqueous solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was used as the starting material. The bacterial inocula (5 × 105 colony-forming unit/mL) were seeded to wells containing chlorhexidine from 0.125 to 128 mg/L and incubated at 35 ℃ for 18 h. S. aureus ATCC 29213 was used as a quality control strain in susceptibility testing. Mupirocin resistance (low and high level) was detected by the disk diffusion method[31], and high-level mupirocin resistance was confirmed by PCR detection of the mupA gene. The qacA/ qacB, smr, and mupA genes were detected by PCR using primers described elsewhere[32].

Infection control measures

From January 2010, our ICUs implemented a central venous catheter bundle including skin cleaning with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% alcohol. Once-daily chlorhexidine bathing was performed on patients with MRSA infections or colonizations in the surgical ICU from August 2011 and in the medical ICU from April 2013. Chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated film dressing was used in 2016. All ICUs performed chlorhexidine bathing from August 2018. Topical nasal mupirocin has not usually been used for decolonization in ICU patients.

Statistical analysis

We analyzed categorical variables using the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test, and continuous variables using Student’s t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test. A univariate analysis of the risk factors for qacA/B-positive MRSA was performed. All variables with P values < 0.1 in the univariate analysis were included in a multiple logistic regression model to identify independent risk factors. These variables were examined for correlations before inclusion in the multivariate analysis. Categorical variables were analyzed by the chi-square test, and continuous variables over time were analyzed by linear regression for trend. All tests of significance were two-tailed, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS, version 24.0 K for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) and MedCalc software (Mariakerke, Belgium).

Results

Prevalence of qacA/B in MRSA blood isolates

During the study period, 238 episodes of ICU-acquired MRSA bacteremia were identified. When the 183 episodes with available MRSA isolates were analyzed, the two major genotypes were ST5-MRSA-II-agr group II (87.4%), the hospital MRSA clone, and ST72-MRSA-IV-agr group I (7.1%), the community-associated MRSA clone in South Korea. Major spa types in ST5-MRSA-II were t2460 (59.4%), t9353 (14.4%), and t002 (8.1%), and those in ST72-MRSA-IV were t148 (23.7%), t664 (23.7%), and t324 (15.4%). The prevalences of the qacA/B and smr genes were 67.2% (123/183) and 3.8% (7/183), respectively. The qacA/B-positive MRSA isolates were predominantly ST5-MRSA-II (96.7% [119/123]), and all ST72-MRSA-IV isolates were qacA/B-negative. Because the clinical and microbiological characteristics of ST5- and ST72-MRSA are known to differ[15], the impact of qacA/B positivity was analyzed in ST5-MRSA-II isolates only, to exclude any effect of clonal heterogeneity on qacA/B negativity.

Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with qacA/B-positive ST5-MRSA-II bacteremia

Of the 160 ST5-MRSA-II isolates, 119 (74.4%) were qacA/B-positive. The clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of the 160 patients with ST5-MRSA-II bacteremia according to the presence of the qacA/B gene are presented in Table 1. Median age was 64 (interquartile range [IQR], 53 to 72 years), and 133 of the patients (70.6%) were male. While there were no significant differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes between the two groups, patients with qacA/B-positive ST5-MRSA-II had a tendency to have bacteremia earlier, to have undergone recent surgery, and suffer septic shock more than those with qacA/B-negative ST5-MRSA-II.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with ST5-MRSA-II bacteremia according to qacA/B status.

Characteristic/outcomeST5-qacA/B (+)(n = 119)ST5-qacA/B (−)(n = 41)All ST5 isolates(n = 160)P value
Median age, years (IQR)64 (53–72)67 (57–73)64 (53–72)0.13
Male gender82 (68.9)31 (75.6)113 (70.6)0.42
MRSA colonization within 1 year before bacteremia90/101 (89.1)27/35 (77.1)117/136 (86.0)0.09
Prior antimicrobial use within 1 month115 (96.6)38 (92.7)153 (95.6)0.37
Site of acquisition
 Nosocomial119 (100)41 (100)160 (100) > 0.99
 Length of hospital stay before bacteremia, days (IQR)22 (12–42)24 (14–80)23 (12–44)0.08
 Length of ICU stay before bacteremia, days (IQR)11 (5–25)16 (7–56)11 (5–28)0.07
Underlying disease/condition
 Solid tumor44 (37.0)15 (36.6)59 (36.9)0.96
 Hematologic malignancy1 (0.8)01 (0.6) > 0.99
 Diabetes mellitus31 (26.1)7 (17.1)38 (23.8)0.24
 Hemodialysis dependence10 (8.4)7 (17.1)17 (10.6)0.14
 Liver cirrhosis25 (21.0)11 (26.8)36 (22.5)0.44
 Solid organ transplantation20 (16.8)10 (24.4)30 (18.8)0.28
 Neutropenia2 (1.7)1 (2.4)3 (1.9) > 0.99
Immunosuppressive treatmenta55 (46.2)18 (43.9)73 (45.6)0.80
 Recent chemotherapy3 (2.5)1 (2.4)4 (2.5) > 0.99
 Recent surgery within 3 months65 (54.6)15 (36.6)80 (50.0)0.05
McCabe and Jackson criteria
 Ultimately or rapidly fatal disease65 (54.6)20 (48.8)85 (53.1)0.52
Charlson comorbidity index, median (IQR)3 (2–5)3 (2–5)3 (2–5)0.45
APACHE II score, median (IQR)21 (16–27)22 (18–29)21 (17–28)0.26
Pitt bacteremia score, median (IQR)4 (2–6)4 (2–5)4 (2–5)0.16
Septic shock34 (28.6)6 (14.6)40 (25.0)0.08
Central venous catheter113 (95.0)38 (92.7)151 (94.4)0.70
Prosthetic deviceb17 (14.3)3 (7.3)20 (12.5)0.25
Site of infection
 Catheter-related bacteremia72 (60.5)23 (56.1)95 (59.4)0.62
 Pneumonia22 (18.5)10 (24.4)32 (20.0)0.42
 Infective endocarditis1 (0.8)01 (0.6) > 0.99
 Postoperative wound infection11 (9.2)4 (9.8)15 (9.4) > 0.99
 Primary bacteremia11 (9.2)3 (7.3)14 (8.8) > 0.99
 Others2 (1.7)1 (2.4)3 (1.9) > 0.99
Eradicable focus77 (64.7)26 (63.4)103 (64.4)0.88
 Removal of eradicable focus/eradicable focus72/77 (93.5)25/26 (96.2)97/103 (94.2) > 0.99
Persistent bacteremia (≥ 3 days)35 (29.4)16 (39.0)51 (31.9)0.26
Persistent bacteremia (≥ 7 days)15 (12.6)8 (19.5)23 (14.4)0.28
Recurrence within 3 months9 (7.6)3 (7.3)12 (7.5) > 0.99
14-day mortality19 (16.0)7 (17.1)26 (16.3)0.84
30-day mortality43 (36.1)16 (39.0)59 (36.9)0.74
12-week mortality58 (48.7)20 (48.8)78 (48.8)0.99

Data are no. (%) of patients, unless otherwise indicated.

ICU intensive care unit, IQR interquartile range, MRSA methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, NA not applicable, SD standard deviation.

aImmunosuppressive treatment includes immunosuppressant use (≥ 7 days), steroid use (≥ 14 days), or radiation therapy (within 1 month).

bProsthetic devices include pacemaker, ICD defibrillator, prosthetic heart valves, vascular grafts, orthopedic devices, and major artery stent.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with ST5-MRSA-II bacteremia according to qacA/B status. Data are no. (%) of patients, unless otherwise indicated. ICU intensive care unit, IQR interquartile range, MRSA methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, NA not applicable, SD standard deviation. aImmunosuppressive treatment includes immunosuppressant use (≥ 7 days), steroid use (≥ 14 days), or radiation therapy (within 1 month). bProsthetic devices include pacemaker, ICD defibrillator, prosthetic heart valves, vascular grafts, orthopedic devices, and major artery stent.

Microbiological and genotypic characteristics of the qacA/B-positive ST5-MRSA-II isolates

The most common spa type of ST5-MRSA-II was t2460 (59.4%), followed by t9353 (14.4%) and t002 (8.1%). As shown in Table 2, t9353 was significantly associated with qacA/B positivity (18.5% vs 2.4%, P = 0.01), and t002 with qacA/B negativity (1.7% vs. 26.8%, P < 0.001). The qacA/B-positive isolates were more often resistant to fusidic acid (93.3% vs. 73.2%, P = 0.001) and gentamicin (95.8% vs. 43.9%, P < 0.001) than were the qacA/B-negative isolates. The association of gentamicin resistance with qacA/B positivity was pronounced in the t2460 isolates (100% [74/74] vs. 33.3% [7/21], P < 0.001). In addition, the qacA/B-positive isolates had significantly higher chlorhexidine MICs than the negative ones (P < 0.001) (Table 2 and Supplemental Fig. S1). The chlorhexidine MIC50 and MIC90 values were 4 mg/L and 4 mg/L in qacA/B-positive isolates, whereas those were 1 mg/L and 2 mg/L, respectively, in qacA/B-negative isolates. However, mupirocin resistance and presence of the mupA gene were not associated with qacA/B positivity. Presence of the smr gene, another chlorhexidine tolerance gene, was significantly associated with qacA/B negativity (P = 0.04).
Table 2

Microbiological and genotypic characteristics of ST5-MRSA-II blood isolates according to qacA/B status.

CharacteristicST5-qacA/B (+)(n = 119)ST5-qacA/B (−)(n = 41)All ST5 isolates(n = 160)P value
Vancomycin MIC (E test)
 MIC, mediana (range), mg/L1.5 (1–2)1.5 (1–2)1.5 (1–2)0.43
 MIC90, mg/L222NA
 ≤ 1 mg/L35 (29.4)13 (31.7)48 (30.0)0.78
 1.5 mg/L50 (42.0)15 (36.6)65 (40.6)0.54
 ≥ 2 mg/L34 (28.6)13 (31.7)47 (29.4)0.70
 hVISA phenotype46 (38.7)15 (36.6)61 (38.1)0.81
spa type
 t246074 (62.2)21 (51.2)95 (59.4)0.22
 t935322 (18.5)1 (2.4)23 (14.4)0.01
 t0022 (1.7)11 (26.8)13 (8.1) < 0.001
 t1481 (0.8)0 (0)1 (0.6) > 0.99
 t2643 (2.5)1 (2.4)4 (2.5) > 0.99
 t93633 (2.5)1 (2.4)4 (2.5) > 0.99
 Others14 (11.8)6 (14.6)20 (12.5)0.63
 agr dysfunction118 (99.2)37 (90.2)155 (96.9)0.02
Antimicrobial resistance
 Clindamycin117 (98.3)41 (100)158 (98.8) > 0.99
 Ciprofloxacin118 (99.2)41 (100)159 (99.4) > 0.99
 Erythromycin119 (100)40 (97.6)159 (99.4)0.26
 Fusidic acid111 (93.3)30 (73.2)141 (88.1)0.001
 Gentamicin114 (95.8)18 (43.9)132 (82.5) < 0.001
 Rifampin16 (13.4)4 (9.8)20 (12.5)0.84
 Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole2 (1.7)1 (2.4)3 (1.9) > 0.99
 Tetracycline103 (86.6)33 (80.5)136 (85.0)0.35
Chlorhexidine MIC
 MIC, mediana (range), mg/L4 (2–4)1 (1–2)3 (2–4) < 0.001
 MIC90, mg/L424NA
 1 mg/L2 (1.7)21 (51.2)23 (14.4) < 0.001
 2 mg/L39 (32.8)18 (43.9)57 (35.6)0.20
 4 mg/L78 (65.5)2 (4.9)80 (50.0) < 0.001
Mupirocin resistance
 Low-level resistance41 (34.5)14 (34.1)55 (34.4)0.97
 High-level resistance4 (3.4)3 (7.3)7 (4.4)0.37
Presence of resistance gene
 smr2 (1.7)4 (9.8)6 (3.8)0.04
 mupA4 (3.4)4 (9.8)8 (5.0)0.21

Data are no. (%) of patients, unless otherwise indicated.

hVISA heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus, MIC minimal inhibitory concentration, MRSA methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, NA not applicable, SD standard deviation.

aMedian MIC means MIC50.

Microbiological and genotypic characteristics of ST5-MRSA-II blood isolates according to qacA/B status. Data are no. (%) of patients, unless otherwise indicated. hVISA heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus, MIC minimal inhibitory concentration, MRSA methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, NA not applicable, SD standard deviation. aMedian MIC means MIC50. Changes in microbiological and genotypic characteristics of ST5-MRSA-II blood isolates. (a) The proportion of qacA/B-positive isolates in ST5-MRSA-II and geometric means of chlorhexidine (CHX) MICs decreased over time (P < 0.001 for trend for both). (b) Changes in spa types. The proportion of qacA/B-positivity in t2460 decreased over time (P < 0.001 for trend). The proportion of qacA/B-positive isolates decreased from 88.1 to 50% over time (P < 0.001 for trend) (Fig. 1a), mainly due to the lowered qacA/B-positive rate in t2460 (P < 0.001 for trend) (Fig. 1b).
Figure 1

Changes in microbiological and genotypic characteristics of ST5-MRSA-II blood isolates. (a) The proportion of qacA/B-positive isolates in ST5-MRSA-II and geometric means of chlorhexidine (CHX) MICs decreased over time (P < 0.001 for trend for both). (b) Changes in spa types. The proportion of qacA/B-positivity in t2460 decreased over time (P < 0.001 for trend).

Risk factors for qacA/B-positive ST5-MRSA-II isolates

Univariate variables with P values of less than 0.1 in Tables 1 and 2 were included in a logistic regression model to identify independent risk factors for qacA/B-positive MRSA. Because the t9353 spa type and fusidic acid resistance were highly correlated with gentamicin resistance, we retained gentamicin resistance only. Also, we included length of ICU stay before bacteremia rather than length of hospital stay before bacteremia because the former is a more clinically meaningful variable in ICU-acquired MRSA bacteremia. Thus, included in the multivariate regression modeling were length of ICU stay before bacteremia (per 10 days), recent surgery, septic shock, gentamicin resistance, non-t002 spa type, and agr dysfunction. The independent risk factors associated with qacA/B positivity were found to be septic shock (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09 to 21.51), gentamicin resistance (aOR, 74.43; 95% CI, 19.19 to 288.67), and non-t002 spa type (aOR, 74.12; 95% CI, 10.99 to 499.60) (Table 3).
Table 3

Univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for presence of qacA/B in ST5-MRSA-II blood isolates.

VariableUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysisa
OR (95% CI)P valueaOR (95% CI)P value
Length of ICU stay before bacteremia, per 10 days0.94 (0.87–1.01)0.10
Recent surgery within 3 months2.09 (1.01–4.33)0.05
Septic shock2.33 (0.90–6.05)0.084.85 (1.09–21.51)0.04
Gentamicin resistance29.13 (9.82–86.43)< 0.00174.43 (19.19–288.67)< 0.001
non-t002 spa type21.45 (4.51–101.97)< 0.00174.12 (10.99–499.60)< 0.001
agr dysfunction12.76 (1.38–117.72)0.03

Data are no. (%) of patients, unless otherwise indicated.

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval.

aThis model fits the data well in terms of discrimination (C-statistic = 0.91) and calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic = 8.62; P = 0.28).

Univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for presence of qacA/B in ST5-MRSA-II blood isolates. Data are no. (%) of patients, unless otherwise indicated. OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval. aThis model fits the data well in terms of discrimination (C-statistic = 0.91) and calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic = 8.62; P = 0.28).

Discussion

In this study we found that the chlorhexidine tolerance genes qacA/B and smr were mainly present in the specific hospital MRSA clone, ST5-MRSA-II, after the implementation of chlorhexidine use in a tertiary hospital from South Korea. The qacA/B gene was independently associated with septic shock, gentamicin resistance, and non-t002 spa type (especially spa type t9353) in a homogenous ST5-MRSA-II background. This implies that the qacA/B coexists well with the t9353 spa type but not the t002 spa type. During the study period, qacA/B positivity decreased significantly in ST5-MRSA-II mainly due to a reduction in qacA/B-positive t2460 isolates despite the increasing use of chlorhexidine in this hospital since 2010. Previous clinical and microbiological studies of qacA/B and smr had been performed on strains with heterogeneous genotypic and clinical backgrounds, including both community and healthcare S. aureus strains[6,13,33,34]. Therefore, the proportion of qacA/B-positive isolates in the present study, which included only ICU-acquired ST5-MRSA-II bacteremia, was higher (74.4%) than in previous studies. Interestingly, the proportion of smr-positive isolates was very low (3.8%), in contrast with previous studies[13,33,34]. In another study conducted in South Korea[6], the proportion of smr-positive MRSA was also low (2.8%), and qacA/B positivity was closely associated with ST5-MRSA, the dominant and generally agr dysfunctional hospital clone[16]. ST72-MRSA, a community-associated MRSA clone in South Korea that is usually agr functional[16], was also significantly associated with qacA/B negativity in that study. Therefore, factors that were found to be independently associated with qacA/B positivity in that study, such as agr dysfunction, nosocomial infection, and previous antibiotic use, could have been reflections of the characteristics of the specific MLST, ST5-MRSA, because all MRSA genotypes were included. The clonal association of qacA/B with hospital MRSA clones such as ST239, ST5, and ST241 have been found in Asia[14,35]. Therefore, the clonal association between qacA/B and ST5-MRSA-II isolates in present study could be influenced by the dominant regional hospital MRSA clone in South Korea. In contrast to other studies that showed the increased proportion of qacA/B positivity after the widespread use of chlorhexidine in hospitals[8-10], the present study revealed that qacA/B positivity in ST5-MRSA-II decreased over time. This finding could be influenced by the decreased proportion of qacA/B-positive rate in t2460, which was main spa type in ST5-MRSA-II. Several studies have shown that healthcare exposure and underlying medical condition are independently associated with qacA/B positivity in S. aureus isolates[6,13,34]. In the present study, we found that septic shock, gentamicin resistance, and fusidic acid resistance were also closely associated with qacA/B positivity in nosocomial ST5-MRSA-II blood isolates in a homogenous MRSA genotypic background. The qacA/B genes are usually carried by large plasmids that encode efflux pumps, and some of these plasmids contain other antibiotic resistance genes[11,12,36]. This fact should influence the likelihood of co-resistance to other antimicrobials such as gentamicin and fusidic acid. In addition, the presence of virulence genes on certain qac plasmids could affect the severity of the illness of patients with qacA/B-positive MRSA bacteremia[37]. Further detailed analysis of our qac plasmids would clarify these associations. Interestingly, the non-t002 spa type was significantly associated with qacA/B positivity in ST5-MRSA-II isolates. t2460 and t9353 are the major spa types of MRSA in South Korea[6,38]. While a previous study showed that t2460 was associated with the qacA/B genes in MRSA strains as a whole[6], we found that only t9353 was strongly associated with qacA/B positivity in a homogenous ST5-MRSA-II background. As shown in Fig. 1b, there has been no outbreak of qacA/B-positive t9353, and the proportion of qacA/B-positivity in t2460 strains has decreased over time (P < 0.001 for trend). Potential hypotheses for such findings are that t9353 spa type might maintain the qacA/B gene efficiently, and t2460 may have a tendency to lose a plasmid carrying qacA/B. This study has several limitations. First, it was conducted in a single tertiary-care hospital and included exclusively MRSA bacteremia occurring in ICUs. Hence, further studies are needed to confirm our results in other hospital settings. Second, because almost all the patients had a recent history of antibiotic use, it was difficult to determine whether antibiotic use exerts selective pressure for chlorhexidine tolerance. Third, despite the proportion of available MRSA blood isolates tested was high (183/238, 77%), these results may not reflect the true prevalence of the genotypes found. Therefore, caution is needed in generalizing the results to other situations. In conclusion, the qacA/B and smr antiseptic tolerance genes were mainly encountered in ST5-MRSA-II, the dominant hospital MRSA clone, after the implementation of chlorhexidine use in a tertiary hospital from South Korea since 2010. Septic shock, gentamicin resistance, and non-t002 spa type were independent predictors of the presence of qacA/B in ST5-MRSA-II blood isolates. Continuous surveillance for the qac genes and molecular characterization of the corresponding plasmids are needed to understand the role of these genes in MRSA epidemiology. Supplementary Information.
  35 in total

1.  Community-associated MRSA strain ST72-SCCmecIV causing bloodstream infections: clinical outcomes and bacterial virulence factors.

Authors:  Ki-Ho Park; Yong Pil Chong; Sung-Han Kim; Sang-Oh Lee; Sang-Ho Choi; Mi Suk Lee; Jin-Yong Jeong; Jun Hee Woo; Yang Soo Kim
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Decolonization to Reduce Postdischarge Infection Risk among MRSA Carriers.

Authors:  Susan S Huang; Raveena Singh; James A McKinnell; Steven Park; Adrijana Gombosev; Samantha J Eells; Daniel L Gillen; Diane Kim; Syma Rashid; Raul Macias-Gil; Michael A Bolaris; Thomas Tjoa; Chenghua Cao; Suzie S Hong; Jennifer Lequieu; Eric Cui; Justin Chang; Jiayi He; Kaye Evans; Ellena Peterson; Gail Simpson; Philip Robinson; Chester Choi; Charles C Bailey; James D Leo; Alpesh Amin; Donald Goldmann; John A Jernigan; Richard Platt; Edward Septimus; Robert A Weinstein; Mary K Hayden; Loren G Miller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Multicenter study to determine disk diffusion and broth microdilution criteria for prediction of high- and low-level mupirocin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Jana M Swenson; Betty Wong; Andrew E Simor; Richard B Thomson; Mary Jane Ferraro; Dwight J Hardy; Janet Hindler; James Jorgensen; L Barth Reller; Maria Traczewski; Linda K McDougal; Jean B Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Veterans Affairs initiative to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Authors:  Rajiv Jain; Stephen M Kralovic; Martin E Evans; Meredith Ambrose; Loretta A Simbartl; D Scott Obrosky; Marta L Render; Ron W Freyberg; John A Jernigan; Robert R Muder; LaToya J Miller; Gary A Roselle
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

6.  Staphylococcus aureus infections in pediatric oncology patients: high rates of antimicrobial resistance, antiseptic tolerance and complications.

Authors:  J Chase McNeil; Kristina G Hulten; Sheldon L Kaplan; Donald H Mahoney; Edward O Mason
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Evaluation of protein A gene polymorphic region DNA sequencing for typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains.

Authors:  B Shopsin; M Gomez; S O Montgomery; D H Smith; M Waddington; D E Dodge; D A Bost; M Riehman; S Naidich; B N Kreiswirth
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988.

Authors:  J S Garner; W R Jarvis; T G Emori; T C Horan; J M Hughes
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.918

9.  Epidemiology and susceptibilities of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Taiwan: emphasis on chlorhexidine susceptibility.

Authors:  Wang-Huei Sheng; Jann-Tay Wang; Tsai-Ling Lauderdale; Chia-Ming Weng; Duckling Chen; Shan-Chwen Chang
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.803

10.  Decreased Incidence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia in Intensive Care Units: a 10-Year Clinical, Microbiological, and Genotypic Analysis in a Tertiary Hospital.

Authors:  Haein Kim; Eun Sil Kim; Seung Cheol Lee; Eunmi Yang; Hee Sueng Kim; Heungsup Sung; Mi-Na Kim; Jiwon Jung; Min Jae Kim; Sung-Han Kim; Sang-Oh Lee; Sang-Ho Choi; Jun Hee Woo; Yang Soo Kim; Yong Pil Chong
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.