Literature DB >> 3579262

Bowel flora changes in humans receiving cefixime (CL 284,635) or cefaclor.

S M Finegold, L Ingram-Drake, R Gee, J Reinhardt, M A Edelstein, K MacDonald, H Wexler.   

Abstract

Twelve healthy young male subjects received either cefixime, a new oral cephalosporin (CL 284,635), or cefaclor (six subjects on each drug) orally for 2 weeks. In the case of cefixime, single daily doses of 400 mg were taken; with cefaclor, the dosage was 250 mg three times daily. Modest changes in the fecal flora were noted in both drug groups, but the changes were of different types. In the case of cefixime, there was more of an impact on the indigenous flora, and in the case of cefaclor, there was more ingrowth of new flora. With cefixime, Enterobacteriaceae were usually decreased (the decrease in Escherichia coli count was statistically significant), as were counts of clostridia and sometimes Bifidobacterium spp.; the Bacteroides fragilis group was eliminated in one subject. Coincident with these decreases, four subjects had increases in counts of group D streptococci of 3 logs or more. There was new appearance of Clostridium difficile in four subjects and of Staphylococcus aureus in one; four new strains of Enterobacteriaceae appeared. With cefaclor, there was no decrease of E. coli counts; two subjects had elimination of Bifidobacterium spp. There was little change in counts of group D streptococci. On the other hand, there were 13 new strains of Enterobacteriaceae, two of S. aureus, and three of C. difficile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3579262      PMCID: PMC174748          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.31.3.443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  7 in total

1.  A double-blind comparison of two different treatments for acute enteritis in adults.

Authors:  E Camarri; A Belvisi; G Guidoni; G Marini; G Frigerio
Journal:  Chemotherapy       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.544

2.  Biochemical characterization and biologic actions of two toxins (D-1 and D-2) from Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Y Banno; T Kobayashi; H Kono; K Watanabe; K Ueno; Y Nozawa
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr

3.  Inhibition of Clostridium difficile by faecal streptococci.

Authors:  H Malamou-Ladas; S Tabaqchali
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.472

4.  In vitro and in vivo antibacterial properties of FK 027, a new orally active cephem antibiotic.

Authors:  T Kamimura; H Kojo; Y Matsumoto; Y Mine; S Goto; S Kuwahara
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Alterations in human fecal flora, including ingrowth of Clostridium difficile, related to cefoxitin therapy.

Authors:  M E Mulligan; D Citron; E Gabay; B D Kirby; W L George; S M Finegold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Bacterial interference between Clostridium difficile and normal fecal flora.

Authors:  R D Rolfe; S Helebian; S M Finegold
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Streptococcus faecium M 74 in control of diarrhoea induced by a human enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli strain in an infant rabbit model.

Authors:  T Wadström
Journal:  Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A       Date:  1984-08
  7 in total
  7 in total

1.  Clinical isolation and resistance patterns of and superinfection with 10 nosocomial pathogens after treatment with ceftriaxone versus ampicillin-sulbactam.

Authors:  Y Carmeli; J Castro; G M Eliopoulos; M H Samore
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Treatment of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection with ceftibuten.

Authors:  G E Stein; S Christensen; N Mummaw
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 3.  Ceftibuten pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Focus on paediatric use.

Authors:  G L Kearns; R A Young
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Cefixime. A review of its antibacterial activity. Pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  R N Brogden; D M Campoli-Richards
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Presence of Clostridium difficile and antibiotic and beta-lactamase activities in feces of volunteers treated with oral cefixime, oral cefpodoxime proxetil, or placebo.

Authors:  E Chachaty; C Depitre; N Mario; C Bourneix; P Saulnier; G Corthier; A Andremont
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Effect of a single dose of cefotaxime or ceftriaxone on human faecal flora. A double-blind study.

Authors:  M Michéa-Hamzehpour; R Auckenthaler; J Kunz; J C Pechère
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Evaluation of an oral suspension of VP20621, spores of nontoxigenic Clostridium difficile strain M3, in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Stephen A Villano; Michael Seiberling; Walter Tatarowicz; Elizabeth Monnot-Chase; Dale N Gerding
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 5.191

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.