| Literature DB >> 35791366 |
Chao Zheng1, Xiaofei Yang1, Zhiqiang Liu2, Kexing Liu3, Yongxiang Huang4.
Abstract
It is of great significance to promote the quantitative research of soil science and the implementation of precision agriculture. On this basis, taking Xuwen County as the research object, this paper comprehensively analyzed the soil characteristics of cultivated land in Xuwen County and clarify the soil nutrient content and spatial distribution characteristics of cultivated land in Xuwen County, this paper comprehensively applied the methods of geostatistics, geographic information system (GIS) and fuzzy mathematics, and referred to the cultivated land quality grade standard (GB/T 33469-2016), to analyze the soil characteristics and evaluate the soil fertility of this region. The results show that the optimal interpolation model of soil pH and available phosphorus (AP) is a Gaussian model, and the optimal interpolation model of soil organic matter (SOM), available nitrogen (AN) and available potassium (AK) is a J-Bessel model. In addition, the spatial correlation of AK is weak, whereas pH, SOM, AN and AP show moderate spatial correlation. The proportion of excellent, good, average, medium and poor comprehensive fertility index are 26.00%, 32.67%, 19.33%, 19.00% and 3.00%, respectively. The overall level of soil fertility in Xuwen County is above the average, and the fertility quality presents an obvious trend of high in the South and low in the North. Areas that above average fertility are mainly distributed in Maichen Town, Qujie Town, Nanshan Town and Chengbei Town. The results can provide theoretical basis for improving the utilization rate of chemical fertilizer, fine management of cultivated land and ecological environment in this region, which can help in decision-making of precision fertilization. ©2022 Zheng et al.Entities:
Keywords: Soil fertility; Geostatistics; Soil nutrients; Spatial variability
Year: 2022 PMID: 35791366 PMCID: PMC9250764 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13239
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 3.061
Figure 1Sampling sites in the study area.
Turning point values of soil fertility indexes.
| Index | Turning point | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| pH | 4.5 | 5.5 |
| SOM/g kg−1 | 5 | 20 |
| AN/mg kg−1 | 30 | 120 |
| AP/mg kg−1 | 20 | 90 |
| AK/m g kg−1 | 60 | 150 |
Notes.
SOM, soil organic matter; AN, alkali-hydrolyzable N; AP, available P; AK, available K.
Figure 2Membership function model and empirical formula.
X is the measured value of the evaluation index, X1 is the lower limit of the evaluation index and X2 is the upper limit of the evaluation index.
Statistical parameters of the factors.
| Index | Data transformation | Mean | SD | Kurtosis | Skewness | Frequency distribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | LOG | 0.74 | 0.22 | −0.8009 | 0.1735 | Normal distribution |
| SOM /g kg−1 | SQRT | 5.32 | 1.42 | −0.1249 | −0.1123 | Normal distribution |
| AN /mg kg−1 | LOG | 2.11 | 0.18 | 0.4997 | −0.3926 | Normal distribution |
| AP /mg kg−1 | SQRT | 9.03 | 3.34 | −0.4300 | 0.3361 | Normal distribution |
| AK /mg kg−1 | SQRT | 13.90 | 4.89 | −0.7209 | 0.0334 | Normal distribution |
Notes.
SOM, soil organic matter; AN, alkali-hydrolyzable N; AP, available P; AK, available K.
Statistical characteristic values of soil nutrients.
| Indexes | Sample sites | Min. | Max. | Mean |
| C.V./% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 300 | 3.69 | 8.35 | 5.56 | 1.03 | 18.57 |
| SOM/g kg−1 | 300 | 0.53 | 74.11 | 30.33 | 15.10 | 49.77 |
| AN/mg kg−1 | 300 | 34.80 | 306.43 | 140.70 | 55.15 | 39.19 |
| AP/mg kg−1 | 300 | 5.47 | 288.69 | 92.63 | 65.23 | 70.42 |
| AK /mg kg−1 | 300 | 10.96 | 634.85 | 217.08 | 139.02 | 64.04 |
Notes.
SOM, soil organic matter; AN, alkali-hydrolyzable N; AP, available P; AK, available K; C.V., coefficient of valiation.
Semi-variance function theory model and parameters of soil nutrients.
| Index | Model | Main variation/km | Variation /km | ARC | Azimuth | C0 | C0+C | C0/(C0+C) | MSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | Gaussian | 0.1390 | 0.0886 | 1.5689 | 136.5820 | 0.0225 | 0.0301 | 74.75% | −0.0211 |
| SOM/g kg−1 | J-Bessel | 0.0100 | 0.0168 | 1.6884 | 85.4297 | 5.7297 | 10.5931 | 54.09% | −0.0054 |
| AN/mg kg−1 | J-Bessel | 0.0138 | 0.0155 | 1.1198 | 169.2773 | 0.1031 | 0.1625 | 63.46% | −0.0308 |
| AP /mg kg−1 | Gaussian | 0.0056 | 0.0034 | 1.6486 | 159.2578 | 28.9266 | 46.4726 | 62.24% | 0.0031 |
| AK /mg kg−1 | J-Bessel | 0.0615 | 0.0397 | 1.5476 | 78.9258 | 61.9723 | 76.1515 | 81.38% | −0.0168 |
Notes.
ARC, anisotropy ratio coefficient; C0, the nugget; C0+C, abutment value; MSE, normalized mean error.
Figure 3Distribution of (A) pH, (B) SOM, (C) AN, (D) AP and (E) AK.
Figure 4Spatial distribution of comprehensive soil fertility index in Xuwen County.
The theoretical model of IFI semi-variance function and its parameters.
| Index | Model | Variation | ARC | Azimuth | C0 | C0+C | C0/(C0+C) | MSE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main variation | Variation | ||||||||
| IFI | Spherical model | 0.0158 | 0.0104 | 1.5166 | 149.4141 | 0.0166 | 0.0448 | 37.13% | 0.0196 |
Notes.
ARC, anisotropy ratio coefficient; C0, the nugget; C0+C, abutment value; MSE, normalized mean error.
Weights of soil fertility indexes.
| Indexes | pH | SOM/g kg−1 | AN /mg kg−1 | AP /mg kg−1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight | 0.1460 | 0.2919 | 0.2257 | 0.1682 | 0.1682 |
Notes.
SOM, soil organic matter; AN, alkali-hydrolyzable N; AP, available P; AK, available K.