Literature DB >> 35791332

An Islamic Bioethics Framework to Justify the At-risk Adolescents' Regulations on Access to Key Reproductive Health Services.

Forouzan Akrami1, Alireza Zali2, Mahmoud Abbasi1.   

Abstract

Adolescent sexuality is one of the most important reproductive health issues that confronts healthcare professionals with moral dilemmas and legal issues. In this study, we aim to justify the at-risk adolescents' regulations on access to key reproductive health services (KRHSs) based on principles of Islamic biomedical ethics and jurisprudence. Despite the illegitimacy and prohibition of sexuality for both girls and boys in Islamic communities, in this study, using 5 principles or universal rules of purpose; certainty, no-harm; necessity; and custom, we argue that first, applying these principles in the context of the no-harm principle can provide the best interests of at-risk adolescents; second, it is permissible to provide KRHSs to these adolescents with their own assent, as long as necessary, only with the intention of preventing or reducing harm. In this framework, while preventing harm, it tries to provide the best interests of at-risk adolescent. Thus, the principle of no-harm requires that the government, by designating the responsibility to healthcare professionals, protects at-risk adolescents from harm, and obliges these professionals to choose and implement the option that best suits adolescents' interests. © National University of Singapore and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent; Best interests; Harm; Islamic Bioethics; Islamic jurisprudence; Reproductive ethics; Reproductive health

Year:  2022        PMID: 35791332      PMCID: PMC9250575          DOI: 10.1007/s41649-021-00200-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev        ISSN: 1793-9453


  17 in total

1.  The best interest standard: both guide and limit to medical decision making on behalf of incapacitated patients.

Authors:  Thaddeus Mason Pope
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  2011

2.  Revisiting the best interest standard: uses and misuses.

Authors:  Douglas S Diekema
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  2011

3.  HIV testing and counseling among adolescents attending family planning clinics.

Authors:  P B Smith; R S Buzi; M L Weinman
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2005-05

4.  Committee Opinion No 699: Adolescent Pregnancy, Contraception, and Sexual Activity.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 5.  Ethics in child and adolescent psychiatric care: An international perspective.

Authors:  Michael Koelch; Joerg M Fegert
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2010

6.  The Harm Principle Cannot Replace the Best Interest Standard: Problems With Using the Harm Principle for Medical Decision Making for Children.

Authors:  Johan Christiaan Bester
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 7.  The Best Interest Standard Is the Best We Have: Why the Harm Principle and Constrained Parental Autonomy Cannot Replace the Best Interest Standard in Pediatric Ethics.

Authors:  Johan C Bester
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  2019

Review 8.  Parental refusals of medical treatment: the harm principle as threshold for state intervention.

Authors:  Douglas S Diekema
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2004

9.  Issues in Islamic biomedical ethics: a primer for the pediatrician.

Authors:  K M Hedayat; R Pirzadeh
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Harm is all you need? Best interests and disputes about parental decision-making.

Authors:  Giles Birchley
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.903

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.