Literature DB >> 35791198

Unmasking Hansen's disease through an ophthalmologist's eye.

Navjot Singh Ahluwalia1, Priyanka Choudhary1, Rakesh Shakya1, Aishwari Revankar2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corneal hypoesthesia; Hansen's disease; Iris pearls; Lagophthalmos; Madarosis

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35791198      PMCID: PMC9426167          DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2157_21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0301-4738            Impact factor:   2.969


× No keyword cloud information.
Leprosy or Hansen’s disease (HD) is a chronic granulomatous inflammatory disease caused by intracellular, rod-shaped, acid-fast bacillus, Mycobacterium leprae (ML). The ML commonly affects cooler parts of the body like the skin, peripheral nerves, earlobes, mucosa of upper respiratory tract, testis, and eyes. Within the eye, it usually affects the anterior segment, which has a relatively lower temperature and rarely involves the posterior pole. Ocular damage in leprosy occurs in four ways: (1) direct bacterial invasion, (2) facial and trigeminal nerve involvement, (3) hypersensitivity reactions, and (4) secondary infection.[1] Ocular manifestations include lagophthalmos, ectropion, entropion, trichiasis, dacryoadenitis, dacryocystitis, episcleritis, scleritis, punctate/avascular/interstitial keratitis, corneal anaesthesia/nerve beading/ulceration/opacity, iridocyclitis, iris atrophy, and nerve paralysis.[2] A 56-year-old male presented to us with complaint of bilateral gradual painless progressive diminution of vision. He was covering his forehead with a cloth and was wearing a mask for protection from coronavirus. He was on oral methyl prednisolone 8 mg/day since 1 year for allergic skin disorder. On examination his best-corrected visual acuity was 1/60 and 2/60 in the right eye (RE) and left eye (LE) resp. Examination revealed papules and plaques on upper/lower lid skin with loss of lateral two-third eye lashes in both eyes (BE). There was lagophthalmos in LE with a lid gap of ~4 mm on gentle closure, no gap on forced closure, and a good bell’s phenomenon [Fig. 1b]. BE had superior corneal pannus [Fig. 2], decreased corneal sensations, absent exposure keratitis, and a quiet anterior chamber (AC). The iris had a normal pattern, absent posterior synechiae (PS) with multiple tiny round creamy white opaque spheres known as iris pearls (IP) scattered all over its surface bilaterally [Fig. 3]. Round, small sluggishly reacting to light pupils (SSRLP) having a poor dilatation with mydriatics were present in BE. Nuclear sclerosis grade 2 with posterior subcapsular cataract and peripheral cortical cataract was present bilaterally with IP over anterior lens capsule in RE [Fig. 3a]. On fundus examination, only faint red glow was seen. On removing the cloth and mask, loss of lateral two-third eyebrows, erythrematous patch on cheeks, and a depressed nasal bridge were appreciable [Fig. 1a, b]. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was 08 mm Hg in BE. Gonioscopy revealed open angles up to the scleral spur with multiple IP scattered in the angles in BE [Fig. 4a-d]. A pattern resembling a necklace or beads of a rosary was seen in the superior angle in RE [Fig. 4a]. BE nasolacrimal duct syringing was patent. The patient was diagnosed as HD and was referred to a dermatologist. On systemic examination, multiple macules and hypoesthetic skin lesions [Fig. 1d], ear nodules [Fig. 1c], and thickened ulnar nerves were present. A positive slit skin smear (SSS) for acid fast bacilli (AFB) confirmed lepromatous leprosy (LL) and multidrug therapy for HD was started. Phacoemulsification (PE) with intraocular lens implantation with iris hooks was advised for RE followed by LE. AC paracentesis (ACP) performed before PE in RE was AFB negative. Post op fundus examination was normal in RE. For the LE, blinking exercises, lubricant eye drops with ointment at night time were prescribed.
Figure 1

a: Photograph of face showing bilateral erythrematous patch on cheeks and a depressed nasal bridge. b: Photograph of face showing madarosis, papules, and plaques on upper/lower lid skin in BE with a lagophthalmos in LE. c: Photograph of face showing ear nodules. d: Photograph showing hyperpigmentation of skin of legs with involvement of toe

Figure 2

Slit-lamp photograph showing superior corneal pannus. a: Slit-lamp photograph (diffuse illumination) of RE. b Slit-lamp photograph (diffuse illumination) of LE. c: Slit-lamp photograph (slit illumination) of RE. d: Slit-lamp photograph (slit illumination) of LE

Figure 3

Slit-lamp photograph (diffuse illumination) showing iris pearls (IP) (black arrows). a: Slit-lamp photograph of RE showing IP on the anterior iris surface and anterior lens capsule. b: Slit-lamp photograph of LE showing IP on the anterior iris surface

Figure 4

Goniophotographs showing Iris pearl(s).(a) Inferior goniophotograph showing superior angle of RE. (b) Inferior goniophotograph showing superior angle of LE. (c) Nasal goniophotograph showing temporal angle of RE. (d) Superior goniophotograph showing inferior angle of LE

a: Photograph of face showing bilateral erythrematous patch on cheeks and a depressed nasal bridge. b: Photograph of face showing madarosis, papules, and plaques on upper/lower lid skin in BE with a lagophthalmos in LE. c: Photograph of face showing ear nodules. d: Photograph showing hyperpigmentation of skin of legs with involvement of toe Slit-lamp photograph showing superior corneal pannus. a: Slit-lamp photograph (diffuse illumination) of RE. b Slit-lamp photograph (diffuse illumination) of LE. c: Slit-lamp photograph (slit illumination) of RE. d: Slit-lamp photograph (slit illumination) of LE Slit-lamp photograph (diffuse illumination) showing iris pearls (IP) (black arrows). a: Slit-lamp photograph of RE showing IP on the anterior iris surface and anterior lens capsule. b: Slit-lamp photograph of LE showing IP on the anterior iris surface Goniophotographs showing Iris pearl(s).(a) Inferior goniophotograph showing superior angle of RE. (b) Inferior goniophotograph showing superior angle of LE. (c) Nasal goniophotograph showing temporal angle of RE. (d) Superior goniophotograph showing inferior angle of LE

Discussion

Loss of hair follicles of eyebrows and eyelashes (madarosis) is a common sign of HD. It usually starts temporally and progresses nasally as was in our case. Another sign, corneal hypoesthesia was present bilaterally with lagophthalmos and good bells phenomenon (LE) but without any corneal exposure and hence was managed conservatively. IP are the diagnostic uveal manifestation of HD and pathognomonic of LL. They have been recognized in none among 250 patients,[3] 1/890 patients,[4] 2.02%,[1] and 4.8%[5] of leprosy patients in various studies. They are usually discovered mainly at the pupil portion around the collarette, in a pattern described as resembling a necklace or the beads of a rosary.[1] However, such a pattern was instead seen in the superior angle of RE on gonioscopy [Fig. 4a], which to the best of our knowledge is the first ever to be reported. They may occur in a clinically uninflamed eye[6] as seen in our case too. In HD, pupils may be miotic, irregular, distorted, eccentric, with or without PS, and may have a sluggish or absent reaction.[2] Our case had small, round pupils without any PS with a diminished reaction. Lewallen et al.[7] reported low IOP in a Hansen’s population as compared to controls. Low IOP is caused by a reduced aqueous production due to destruction and late atrophy of the ciliary body.[8] Our case too had an IOP in single digits despite being on oral steroids. Confirmation of the systemic disease is by the detection of bacilli on SSS or skin tissue biopsy. The diagnosis of lepromatous uveitis (LU) through skin, aqueous humor, and iris biopsy has been reported by Messmer EM et al.[9] Michelson JB et al.[6] and Campos et al.[10] also reported the diagnosis of ML through ACP in bilateral LU. The diagnosis in our patient too was ultimately established by an AFB positive SSS, while the RE ACP was AFB negative. HD is not frequently encountered by ophthalmologists in their clinics nowadays. A delay in diagnosis leads to more complications and sometimes blindness. Hence, ophthalmologists should be aware and have a strong index of suspicion of HD in the presence of above ophthalmic features, including unexplained SSRLP/low IOP along with skin lesions/anesthesia, neurological involvement or nasal stuffiness.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  10 in total

1.  PATTERN OF EYE DISEASES IN LEPROSY PATIENTS OF NORTHERN GHANA.

Authors:  S CHATTERJEE; D S CHAUDHURY
Journal:  Int J Lepr       Date:  1964 Jan-Mar

2.  Intraocular pressure and iris denervation in Hansen's disease.

Authors:  S Lewallen; N Hussein; P Courtright; H B Ostler; R H Gelber
Journal:  Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis       Date:  1990-03

3.  Bilateral iridocyclitis caused by Mycobacterium leprae diagnosed through paracentesis.

Authors:  W R Campos; F Oréfice; M A Sucena; C A Rodrigues
Journal:  Indian J Lepr       Date:  1998 Jan-Mar

4.  Ocular complications of leprosy in Cameroon.

Authors:  C E Mvogo; A L Bella-Hiag; A Ellong; J H Achu; P F Nkeng
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2001-02

5.  Ocular leprosy in Uganda.

Authors:  V P Emiru
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 6.  Ocular leprosy.

Authors:  Andrzej Grzybowski; Małgorzata Nita; Marcos Virmond
Journal:  Clin Dermatol       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.541

7.  Ocular autonomic dysfunction and intraocular pressure in leprosy.

Authors:  S Lewallen; P Courtright; H S Lee
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Lepromatous iridocyclitis diagnosed by anterior chamber paracentesis.

Authors:  J B Michelson; A M Roth; G O Waring
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Lepromatous uveitis diagnosed by iris biopsy.

Authors:  E M Messmer; M B Raizman; C S Foster
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Role of iris changes as a cause of blindness in lepromatous leprosy.

Authors:  T J Ffytche
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 4.638

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Commentary: Ocular lesions in leprosy - Should we forget?

Authors:  Jyotirmay Biswas; Arkaprava Pradhan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.969

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.