Literature DB >> 35790553

The Potential Economic Benefits of an Alarm Service in Order Communication Systems in Korea: a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Less-Intensive Fracture Liaison Services Based on a Prospective Cohort Study.

Suhyun Jang1, Young-Kyun Lee2, Yong-Chan Ha3, Sunmee Jang4.   

Abstract

An alarm service in an order communication system (OCS) was found to be effective at increasing the rate of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing and treatment in South Korea, but its cost-effectiveness remains unknown. We used a Markov model to determine the cost-effectiveness of the alarm service in the OCS compared to no alarm service for the post-fracture management of subjects aged 50 years and older with fragility fractures. DXA testing and treatment data were collected from a prospective cohort study. The prevalence of osteoporotic fractures, the subsequent risk of hip fracture, and healthcare costs were obtained using Korea National Health Insurance claims data. The lifetime cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained were estimated from a healthcare perspective. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to examine the uncertainty of the results. The alarm service increased treatment by 125 per 1000 patients and prevented 3 hip fractures per 1000 patients. The alarm service cost an additional 249,393 KRW and resulted in an increase of 0.008 QALYs per patient compared to no alarm service. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 31,174,125 KRW (26,843 USD) per QALY gained. The alarm service was cost-effective than no alarm service if the willingness to pay setting as 1GDP per capita (29,288 USD) per QALY gained. This study shows that less-intensive fracture liaison services, such as an alarm service, are cost-effective for patients aged 50 years and older with osteoporotic fractures in Korea. An intensive model, including enhanced identification and education, could further prevent the risk of refracture and improve cost-effectiveness.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alarm service; Cost-effectiveness; Less-intensive fracture liaison service; Order communication system; Post-fracture management; South Korea

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35790553     DOI: 10.1007/s00223-022-01000-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.000


  39 in total

1.  Orthopaedic surgeons and fragility fractures. A survey by the Bone and Joint Decade and the International Osteoporosis Foundation.

Authors:  K E Dreinhöfer; J M Féron; A Herrera; R Hube; O Johnell; L Lidgren; K Miles; L Panarella; H Simpson; W A Wallace
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-09

2.  Lifetime and five-year age-specific risks of first and subsequent osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  D A Doherty; K M Sanders; M A Kotowicz; R L Prince
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Economic Burden of Osteoporosis in South Korea: Claim Data of the National Health Insurance Service from 2008 to 2011.

Authors:  Yong-Chan Ha; Ha-Young Kim; Sunmee Jang; Young-Kyun Lee; Tae-Young Kim
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 4.  Epidemiology of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Elaine Dennison; Maysam Abdin Mohamed; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.670

5.  Making the first fracture the last fracture: ASBMR task force report on secondary fracture prevention.

Authors:  John A Eisman; Earl R Bogoch; Rick Dell; J Timothy Harrington; Ross E McKinney; Alastair McLellan; Paul J Mitchell; Stuart Silverman; Rick Singleton; Ethel Siris
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Current trends and future projections of hip fracture in South Korea using nationwide claims data.

Authors:  Y-C Ha; T-Y Kim; A Lee; Y-K Lee; H-Y Kim; J-H Kim; C-M Park; S Jang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Fracture risk following an osteoporotic fracture.

Authors:  O Johnell; J A Kanis; A Odén; I Sernbo; I Redlund-Johnell; C Petterson; C De Laet; B Jönsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-12-23       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Future life expectancy in 35 industrialised countries: projections with a Bayesian model ensemble.

Authors:  Vasilis Kontis; James E Bennett; Colin D Mathers; Guangquan Li; Kyle Foreman; Majid Ezzati
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  For the first fracture to be the last.

Authors:  Bernardo Stolnicki; Lindomar Guimarães Oliveira
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2016-02-01

Review 10.  Trend in the Age-Adjusted Incidence of Hip Fractures in South Korea: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Lee; Jin Woo Kim; Myung Ho Lee; Kyung Ho Moon; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-11-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.