| Literature DB >> 35789863 |
Jose Andres Areiza-Padilla1, Tatiana Galindo-Becerra1.
Abstract
The quarantines caused by the Covid-19, generated that thousands of university students had to abruptly abandon their classroom classes, and receive them in a virtual way. This sudden change caused a break in the daily life of thousands of university students, who were forced to use a teaching method that, although not new, was unusual at that time. This, initially generated a situation of rejection, stress and a perception of low quality classes that were received in a virtual way. However, with the passage of time, there was a need to know the perception of students about the quality of their virtual classes, but once the mandatory quarantine ended, because the literature has been focused only during the quarantine period. On the other hand, most studies on this topic have focused on developed countries, so there is little literature on the perception of virtual classes, taken by students from South America, whose countries have economic, social and technological characteristics, very different from developed countries. Based on the above, this study analyzes the perceptions of 867 students from 12 private business schools in the city of Bogota, Colombia. The data processed through PLS, allows us to observe that students have changed their negative perception towards virtual classes, and that, at present, these classes are considered of quality. Similarly, we can see that satisfaction, the willingness to continue using this methodology in the future, and the good performance of the university brand, are direct results of the quality of virtual classes.Entities:
Keywords: Business school; Digital teaching; Quality; University brand; Virtual classes
Year: 2022 PMID: 35789863 PMCID: PMC9249828 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09774
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Research model. Source: Author's own compilation.
Sample distribution.
| N | % | |
|---|---|---|
| Men | 400 | 46,1% |
| Women | 467 | 53,9% |
| 18–25 | 551 | 63,6% |
| 26–35 | 297 | 34,3% |
| 36–45 | 19 | 2,2% |
| Business/Administration | 317 | 36,6% |
| Tourism | 78 | 9,0% |
| International trade | 45 | 5,2% |
| Marketing/Sales/Advertising | 263 | 30,3% |
| Finance/Accounting | 140 | 16,1% |
| Other related. | 24 | 2,8% |
| Colombia | 719 | 82,9% |
| Foreign students in Colombia (From South America) | 148 | 17,1% |
Source: Author's own compilation.
Sources of measured items.
| Study variable | Author(s) | Item(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual classes quality | 4 | |
| Student satisfaction regarding virtual classes | 4 | |
| Intent to continue using virtual classes | 5 | |
| University brand performance | 8 |
Source: Author's own compilation.
Measurement model evaluation results.
| Variables/Items | Mean | St. Dev | Loadings Factor |
|---|---|---|---|
| The web site for virtual classes seems to be up to date | 4.33 | 1.78 | 0.837∗ |
| The web site for virtual classes works well | 4.28 | 1.74 | 0.787∗ |
| The web site for virtual classes has clear instruction. | 4.17 | 1.63 | 0.768∗ |
| Your perception of the overall quality of the education you get through virtual classes is excellent | 4.29 | 1.63 | 0.789∗ |
| I am satisfied with my decision to enroll in the online classes | 5.18 | 1.88 | 0.723∗ |
| My choice to enroll in online classes was a wise one | 4.87 | 1.46 | 0.799∗ |
| I think I did the right thing when I paid for online learning service | 4.09 | 1.65 | 0.834∗ |
| I feel that my experience with online learning has been enjoyable | 5.22 | 1.74 | 0.778∗ |
| If there is a need to learn in the future. I will use virtual classes to learn. | 4.49 | 1.71 | 0.818∗ |
| Besides using the university website to learn. I will also use other virtual classes tools more frequently and actively. | 4.83 | 1.87 | 0.967∗ |
| I will suggest others to use virtual classes to learn. | 5.45 | 1.99 | 0.776∗ |
| I know I get good service for the fee I paid for online distance learning | 5.02 | 1.63 | 0.702∗ |
| I would likely do another degree program online | 5.89 | 1.84 | 0.943∗ |
| This university as a brand is reliable | 4.76 | 1.92 | 0.878∗ |
| A degree from this university is worthy | 4.88 | 1.74 | 0.784∗ |
| This university performs well | 4.78 | 1.79 | 0.869∗ |
| I found that this university has a good reputation | 4.33 | 1.94 | 0.801∗ |
| I am proud to be a student of this university | 4.23 | 1.77 | 0.794∗ |
| A degree from this university enhances employability | 4.76 | 1.54 | 0.904∗ |
| The graduates of this university receive a good salary | 4.87 | 1.63 | 0.731∗ |
| Employers prefer graduates from this university | 4.84 | 1.62 | 0.776∗ |
α = Cronbach's Alpha; CR = Composite reliability; AVE = Average Variance Extracted; ∗p < 0.01.
Source: Author's own compilation.
Analysis for discriminant validity.
| Virtual classes quality | Student satisfaction | Intent to continue using | University brand performance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual classes quality | 0.289 | 0.238 | 0.279 | |
| Student satisfaction regarding virtual classes | 0.278 | 0.183 | 0.428 | |
| Intent to continue using virtual classes in the future | 0.309 | 0.129 | 0.164 | |
| University brand performance | 0.178 | 0.430 | 0.238 |
Note: On the diagonal: square root of the AVE values. Below the diagonal: correlations. Above the diagonal: HTMT values.
Source: Author's own compilation.
Results of the structural equations model.
| Hypothesis | Relationship | β | t | p-Value | Contrast |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | F1 –F2 | 0,343 | 3,679 | 0,015 | Supported |
| H2 | F2–F3 | 0,265 | 3,125 | 0,000 | Supported |
| H3 | F1–F3 | 0,283 | 2,878 | 0,025 | Supported |
| H4 | F1–F4 | 0,317 | 2,980 | 0,008 | Supported |
| H5 | F4–F5 | 0,278 | 3,677 | 0,000 | Supported |
Note: R2 (F2) = 0.189; R2 (F3) = 0.256; R2 (F4) = 0.487; Q2 (F2) = 0.298; Q2 (F3) = 0.256; Q2 (F4) = 0.172.
Source: Author's own compilation.