| Literature DB >> 35789807 |
Alessandro Rossi1,2, Martijn G S Rutten3, Theo H van Dijk4, Barbara M Bakker3, Dirk-Jan Reijngoud3, Maaike H Oosterveer3, Terry G J Derks1.
Abstract
Hypoglycemia results from an imbalance between glucose entering the blood compartment and glucose demand, caused by a defect in the mechanisms regulating postprandial glucose homeostasis. Hypoglycemia represents one of the most common metabolic emergencies in childhood, potentially leading to serious neurologic sequelae, including death. Therefore, appropriate investigation of its specific etiology is paramount to provide adequate diagnosis, specific therapy and prevent its recurrence. In the absence of critical samples for biochemical studies, etiological assessment of children with hypoglycemia may include dynamic methods, such as in vivo functional tests, and continuous glucose monitoring. By providing detailed information on actual glucose fluxes in vivo, proof-of-concept studies have illustrated the potential (clinical) application of dynamic stable isotope techniques to define biochemical and clinical phenotypes of inherited metabolic diseases associated with hypoglycemia. According to the textbooks, individuals with glycogen storage disease type I (GSD I) display the most severe hypoglycemia/fasting intolerance. In this review, three dynamic methods are discussed which may be considered during both diagnostic work-up and monitoring of children with hypoglycemia: 1) functional in vivo tests; 2) in vivo metabolic profiling by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM); 3) stable isotope techniques. Future applications and benefits of dynamic methods in children with hypoglycemia are also discussed.Entities:
Keywords: children; continuous glucose monitoring; fasting challenge; functional tests; hepatic glycogen storage diseases; hypoglycemia; stable isotopes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35789807 PMCID: PMC9249565 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.858832
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 6.055
Relationship between age, blood glucose pool and endogenous glucose production (EGP).
| A | Age (years) | 1 | 3 | 5 | 10 | 15 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | Body weight (kg) | 13 | 18 | 23 | 35 | 48 | |
| C | Blood volume (ml) | 1,000 | 1,400 | 1,800 | 2,800 | 3,800 | |
| D | Blood pool of glucose (mg) | 721 | 1,009 | 1,297 | 2,018 | 2,738 | |
| E | EGP |
| 8.2 | 6.1 | 5.1 | 3.5 | 2.7 |
|
| 34 | 35 | 37 | 40 | 41 | ||
, based on ‘the APLS formula’ BW = [Age(years) + 4] x 2.5;
, based on ‘the APLS formula’ BV = 80 ml/kg x BW(kg);
, based on (19);
, based on (20).
Main in vivo functional tests used in children with hypoglycemia. Historical indications are shown.
| Functional | Historical indications |
|---|---|
| Explorative controlled fasting test | Assessment of fasting tolerance in situations of childhood hypoglycemia or fasting intolerance, before performing an extended controlled fasting test |
| Extended controlled fasting test | Clarification of hypoglycemia in FAOD, disorders of ketogenesis/ketolysis and some endocrinopathies |
| Intravenous glucagon test | Differentiation of hypoglycemia |
| Oral glucose loading test | Hypoglycemia or moderate/intermittent hyperlactatemia of unknown origin (e.g., hepatic GSDs, disorders of gluconeogenesis, PDH deficiency, hyperinsulinemia, mitochondrial disorders, SGLT1 deficiency) |
| Oral galactose loading test | SGLT1 deficiency |
| Oral fructose loading test | Hereditary fructose intolerance |
| Intravenous fructose loading test | Hereditary fructose intolerance |
| Oral protein/leucine tolerance test | Hyperinsulinism |
| Fat loading test | FAOD |
| Phenylpropionate loading test | Medium-chain acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase deficiency |
FAOD, fatty acid oxidation disorders; GSDs, glycogen storage diseases; PDH, pyruvate dehydrogenase complex.
Previous studies using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in hepatic GSD patients.
| Reference | Device | Country | Population (n. of patients) | Age (range in years) | GSD subtype |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hershkovitz ea. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2001 ( | MiniMed (Medtronic) | Israel | 4 | 2-15 | Ia |
| Maran ea. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2004 ( | Glucoday® (Menarini) | Italy | 4 | 14-47 | Ia |
| 1 | 22 | Ib | |||
| 1 | 10 | III | |||
| White ea. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2011 ( | iPro™ (Medtronic) | UK | 1 | 6 | 0 |
| 6 | 0-13 | Ia | |||
| 2 | 0-3 | Ib | |||
| 7 | 4-20 | III | |||
| 4 | 5-16 | IX | |||
| 2 | 2-24 | XI | |||
| Kasapkara ea. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014 ( | MiniMed (Medtronic) | Turkey | 15 | 2-18 | Ia |
| 1 | Ib | ||||
| Herbert ea. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2018 ( | Dexcom G4 Platinum | USA | 7 | 2-56 | Ia |
| 2 | 9-17 | Ib | |||
| 6 | 6-44 | III | |||
| 5 | 7-17 | IX | |||
| Kaiser ea. Mol Gen Metab. 2019 ( | iPRO2® (Medtronic) | Switzerland | 12 | 11-49 | Ia |
| Peeks ea. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2021 ( | Dexcom G6 (Dexcom) | Netherlands | 1 | 9 | Ia |
| 12 | 2-22 | Ia, III, IX | |||
| 3 | 2-11 | Ib |
Previous studies assessing ketones and glucose concentrations after prolonged fasting in healthy children.
| Reference | Study population (n) | Age (years) | Duration of fasting (hours) | Descriptive statistics | Glucose concentrations (mmol/L) | Ketone body concentrations1 (mmol/L) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chaussain ea. J Pediatr. 1977 ( | 28 | 2 - 17 | 24 | - Range | 1.7 - 4.3 Blood sugar significantly correlated to age | Ketonuria ranging from 0 to +++ The extent of ketonuria seemed to decrease with age | |
| Wolfsdorf ea. Eur. J. Pediatr. 1982 ( | 23 | 1.9 - 16.7 | 24 | - Mean and SD- 95% C.I. for BHB at various ages | 3.3 ± 0.7 | BHB: 2.8 ± 1.3; ACA: 0.4 ± 0.1 95% C.I. BHB.: - 3 years: 2.5-5.5 - 6 years: 2.0-5.0 - 9 years: 1.0-4.0 -12 years: 0.3-3.5 Negative correlation between plasma ketone bodies and age. | |
| Haymond ea. Metabolism. 1982 ( | 15 | 6.1 ± 0.8 | 30 | - Mean and SD | 2.9 ± 0.2 | BHB: 3.7 ± 0.4; ACA: 1.3 ± 0.1 Negative correlation between plasma ketone bodies and blood glucose concentrations. | |
| Lamers ea. Clin Chim Acta.1985a ( | 72 | 3 - 15 | 14 (overnight) | - Mean and SD - p2.5-p97.5 | 4.34 ± 0.343.72-5.05 | BHB: 0.22 ± 0.23; ACA: 0.10 ± 0.05 BHB: 0.07-1.58; ACA: 0.06-0.30 Negative correlation between plasma ketone bodies and age. | |
| Lamers ea. Clin Chim Acta.1985b ( | 13 | 3 - 5 | 24 | - Median | 3.5 | BHB: 2.07; ACA: 0.55 | |
| 58 | 6-15 | 40 | - Mean and SD - p2.5-p97.5 | 3.44 ± 0.442.64-4.41 | BHB: - 6-11 years: 3.15 ± 1.38; p2.5: 1.36; p97.5: 8.90 - 12 years: p2.5: 1.01; p97.5: 6.58 - 15 years: p2.5: 0.49; p97.5: 3.18 ACA: - 6-11 years: 0.66 ± 0.25; p2.5: 0.33; p97.5: 1.52 - 12 years: p2.5:0.28; p97.5:1.27 - 15 years: p2.5: 0.18; p97.5: 1.81 Negative correlation between plasma ketone bodies and age. | ||
| Bonnefont ea. Eur. J. Pediatr.1990 ( | 12 | < 1 | 15 | - p10- p90 | 3.9 - 5.3 | BHB: 0.1 - 1.0 | |
| 20 | 3.5 - 4.6 | BHB: 0.5 - 2.3 | |||||
| 24 | 2.7 - 4.5 | BHB: 1.1 - 2.8 | |||||
| 27 | 1 - 7 | 15 | 3.5 - 4.8 | BHB: <0.1 - 0.9 | |||
| 20 | 2.8 - 4.3 | BHB: 0.8 - 2.6 | |||||
| 24 | 2.8 - 3.8 | BHB: 1.7 - 3.2 | |||||
| 9 | 7 - 15 | 15 | 4.4 - 4.9 | BHB: <0.1 - 0.3 | |||
| 20 | 3.8 - 4.9 | BHB: <0.1 - 0.8 | |||||
| 24 | 3.0 - 4.3 | BHB: 0.5 - 1.3 | |||||
| van Veen ea. Pediatrics. 2011 ( | 49 | 0 - 2 | 15 | - Median - p10-p90 | 4.13.1 - 4.8 | BHB: 1.00 0.22-2.34 | ACA: 0.42 0.10-0.87 |
| 20 | 3.32.8 - 3.9 | BHB: 2.23 0.91-3.31 | ACA: 0.42 | ||||
| 79 | 2 - 7 | 15 | 4.63.8 - 5.3 | BHB: 0.30 0.03-1.26 | ACA: 0.16 <0.05-0.43 | ||
| 20 | 4.03.0 - 4.8 | BHB: 1.19 0.36-2.56 | ACA: 0.46 0.13-0.91 | ||||
| 24 | 3.83.0 - 4.8 | BHB: 2.01 0.81-3.54 | ACA: 0.710.27-1.14 | ||||
| 39 | 7 - 18 | 15 | 4.94.1 - 5.3 | BHB: 0.19 <0.02-1.27 | ACA: 0.12 <0.05-0.46 | ||
| 20 | 4.23.3 - 5.2 | BHB: 0.62 0.09-2.18 | ACA: 0.29 0.09-0.81 | ||||
| 24 | 4.13.5 - 4.9 | BHB: 1.31 0.32-2.46 | ACA: 0.500.22-0.96 | ||||
| Parmar ea. JIMD Rep. 2021 ( | 94 | 0.5-18.7 | Overnight | Range | 3.9-6.7 | BHB: 0.0 - 1.2 | |
1Assessed in plasma or serum if not otherwise stated.
2For each age and fasting duration group median values (top line) and p10-p90 range (bottom line) for BHB (left subcolumn) and ACA (right subcolumn) are shown.
ACA, acetoacetate; BHB, beta-hydroxybutyrate; p2.5, 2.5th percentile; p10, 10th percentile; p90, 90th percentile; p97.5, 97.5th percentile; SD, standard deviation; 95% C.I., 95% confidence intervals.
Metabolic profiling in two children with hepatic GSDs.
| Case | Sample (time) | CGM Glucose (mmol/l) | Lactate (mmol/l) | BHB (mmol/l) | ALT (U/l) | AST (U/l) | Cholesterol (mmol/l) | Triglycerides (mmol/l) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference value: – | Reference value: < 2.2 | Reference value: < 0.42 | Reference value: < 35 | Reference value: < 45 | Reference value: < 5.2 | Reference value: < 2.0 | ||
| 1 | A (14:09h) | 5.1 | 5.4 | 0.06 | 1,220 | 1,503 | 2.9 | 7.54 |
| B (16:25h) | 4.8 | 3.7 | 0.08 | – | – | 2.8 | 5.85 | |
| 2 | C (14:19h) | 5.6 | 4.2 | 0.17 | 217 | 236 | 6.8 | 9.10 |
| D (06:30h) | 4.2 | – | 0.2 | – | – | – | – | |
| E (08:43h) | 4.0 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 337 | 578 | 6.6 | 9.05 | |
| F (11:00h) | 3.9 | – | 1.3 | – | – | – | – | |
| G (14:00h) | 3.3 | 1.3 | 1.8 | – | – | 6.7 | 3.95 |
Case 1 was referred by the general pediatrician and seen at the metabolic outpatient clinic at the age of eight months with failure to thrive and suspicion of hepatomegaly. Sample A was randomly obtained two hours after the last meal and sample B was obtained pre-prandially. Subsequently, he was admitted at the ward and dietary management was titrated, guided by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and point-of-care (POCT) beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) measurements. Homozygosity for the c.4529dupA, p.Tyr1510* AGL variant confirmed the diagnosis GSD IIIa. Case 2 was referred by the general pediatrician and seen at the metabolic outpatient clinic on a Friday afternoon at the age of 3.3 years with protruding abdomen, hepatomegaly, and abnormal transaminase values. The initial history did neither indicate severe metabolic decompensations, nor fasting intolerance. Sample C was randomly collected, and the boy went home with his parents, while a food diary, CGM and POCT BHB measurements were started at home over the weekend. When he returned on Monday, the food diary documented that the patient drank milk and ate meals at night times (02:10h; 03:02h) and early in the morning (05:50h). At home, his POCT glucose and BHB concentrations were 3.7 mmol/l and 1.8 mmol/l respectively, after a pause 7h47min at night. At the ward after breakfast (sample D), during real-time monitoring with an alarming CGM and glucose/BHB POCT measurements (samples E and F), sample G was obtained pre-prandially. Subsequently, dietary management was titrated and homozygosity for the c.2126T>C, p.Leu709Pro PYGL variant confirmed the diagnosis GSD VI.–, not available.