Bartłomiej Szewczyk1, Marko Konschake2, Michał Podgórski3, Nicol Zielinska1, Maja Markanicz1, Andrzej Borowski4, Łukasz Olewnik5. 1. Department of Anatomical Dissection and Donation, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland. 2. Institute of Clinical and Functional Anatomy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. 3. Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland. 4. Orthopaedics and Paediatric Orthopaedics Department, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland. 5. Department of Anatomical Dissection and Donation, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland. lukasz.olewnik@umed.lodz.pl.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The anterior compartment of the arm consists of three muscles: the biceps brachii, brachialis and coracobrachialis. The aim of the present study was to characterize possible variations in the morphology of the proximal attachments of the long head of the biceps brachii and to propose an accurate classification of the area which can be useful for planning surgical procedures and planning rehabilitation in the region. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty (40 left and 40 right, 40 female, 40 male) upper limbs fixed in 10% formalin solution were examined. RESULTS: The main tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii demonstrated three types of attachment. The most common type, Type I (53.75%), was characterized by a single attachment only for the supraglenoid tubercle. Type III (33.75%) was characterized by a single attachment to the glenoid labrum. Type II (12.5%) was characterized by a double attachment to the glenoid labrum and the supraglenoid tubercle. Additionally, two types of the accessory tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii were identified (Type A-B). Type A (14 cases) was attached to the capsule of the humeral joint, and Type B (six cases) was attached to the greater tubercle of the humerus. CONCLUSION: The long head of the biceps brachii is characterized by high morphological variability. The new classification proposes three types of proximal attachment (I-III), with two types of accessory long head of the biceps brachii (A-B) tendon. A thorough understanding of the morphological variability of the long head of the biceps brachii is necessary when planning arthroscopic procedures or even planning rehabilitation procedures.
INTRODUCTION: The anterior compartment of the arm consists of three muscles: the biceps brachii, brachialis and coracobrachialis. The aim of the present study was to characterize possible variations in the morphology of the proximal attachments of the long head of the biceps brachii and to propose an accurate classification of the area which can be useful for planning surgical procedures and planning rehabilitation in the region. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty (40 left and 40 right, 40 female, 40 male) upper limbs fixed in 10% formalin solution were examined. RESULTS: The main tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii demonstrated three types of attachment. The most common type, Type I (53.75%), was characterized by a single attachment only for the supraglenoid tubercle. Type III (33.75%) was characterized by a single attachment to the glenoid labrum. Type II (12.5%) was characterized by a double attachment to the glenoid labrum and the supraglenoid tubercle. Additionally, two types of the accessory tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii were identified (Type A-B). Type A (14 cases) was attached to the capsule of the humeral joint, and Type B (six cases) was attached to the greater tubercle of the humerus. CONCLUSION: The long head of the biceps brachii is characterized by high morphological variability. The new classification proposes three types of proximal attachment (I-III), with two types of accessory long head of the biceps brachii (A-B) tendon. A thorough understanding of the morphological variability of the long head of the biceps brachii is necessary when planning arthroscopic procedures or even planning rehabilitation procedures.
Authors: Nicol Zielinska; R Shane Tubbs; Andrzej Borowski; Michał Podgórski; Łukasz Olewnik Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2021-12-11 Impact factor: 3.411