Literature DB >> 35785688

Adjuvant Denosumab therapy following curettage and external fixator for a giant cell tumor of the distal radius presenting with a pathological fracture: A case report.

Arulanantham Arulprashanth1, Aadil Faleel1, Chamikara Palkumbura1, Umesh Jayarajah2, Rukshan Sooriyarachchi1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Denosumab is used as a neoadjuvant therapy for giant cell tumours (GCT) prior to surgery to improve surgical clearance and reduce the rate of recurrence. However, the use of denosumab as adjuvant therapy following an external fixator for GCT of the distal radius has not been commonly described. We describe the use of adjuvant denosumab following curettage and external fixation in a patient with GCT of the distal radius presenting with a pathological fracture. CASE
PRESENTATION: A 23-year-old male presented with a right distal radius fracture. Imaging was suggestive of a Campanacci grade 3 GCT at the distal radius with a pathological fracture. His chest X-ray was normal. He was managed with a dorsal open distal radius curettage and stabilization of the fracture with an external minifixator. Histology confirmed a GCT and adjuvant denosumab therapy was given. The response was satisfactory and the external fixator was removed at 5 months. At 42 months post-treatment, he had satisfactory function with no evidence of recurrence. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: The extensive involvement of the distal radius and local invasion precluded the use of internal fixation after thorough curettage. Therefore, an external minifixator was applied to stabilize the fracture and started on denosumab following oncology opinion.
CONCLUSION: External fixation and adjuvant denosumab may be considered as an option in patients who are not suitable for internal fixation. However, cohort studies with long term follow up is necessary before it can be recommended in routine practice.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Case report; Denosumab; Distal radius fracture; External fixator; Giant cell tumor; Pathological fracture

Year:  2022        PMID: 35785688      PMCID: PMC9284045          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep        ISSN: 2210-2612


Introduction

Giant cell tumor (GCT) is a bone neoplasm that grows from clusters of neoplastic, mononuclear cells amongst uniformly distributed large osteoclast-like giant cells. It is generally benign in nature with a tendency for local infiltration and rarely metastasize to lungs [1]. Furthermore, it has a recurrence rate of 15–45 % [2]. This osteolytic lesion results from activated osteoclast-mediated bone resorption via the RANK/RANKL pathway [3]. Distal radius is the third commonest site for GCT following knee joint and proximal humerus [4]. Surgery is the main stay of treatment however, the location of the tumor may preclude radical resection due to the functional demand of the involved site. Denosumab is used as a neoadjuvant therapy for GCT prior to surgery to improve surgical clearance and reduce the rate of recurrence. However, the use of denosumab as adjuvant therapy following an external fixator for GCT of the distal radius has not been described. We describe the use of adjuvant denosumab following curettage and external fixation in a 23-year-old male patient with a Campanacci grade 3 GCT of the distal radius presenting after 3 months following a pathological fracture. The work has been reported based on the SCARE 2020 criteria [5].

Case presentation

A previously healthy, 23-year-old, right hand dominant Sri Lankan male presented with pain along the radial side of the right wrist for 3 months following a fall on the outstretched hand. He had no significant drug or allergy history, family history or psychosocial history. Clinical examination was unremarkable except mild swelling and tenderness over the distal radius. X-ray films showed an osteolytic lesion at the distal radius with a pathological fracture (Fig. 1). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a probable Campanacci grade 3 GCT at the distal radius with a pathological fracture. The lesion was expansile with extension into the pronator quadratus and showed intense heterogeneous enhancement following intravenous contrast (Fig. 2). His chest X-ray was normal.
Fig. 1

A: R-ray film showing an osteolytic lesion at the distal radius with a pathological fracture; B: after application of an external fixator; C: 3 months after surgery; D: 6 months post-treatment.

Fig. 2

MRI scan of the distal radius showing a Campanacci grade 3 GCT at the distal radius with a pathological fracture.

A: R-ray film showing an osteolytic lesion at the distal radius with a pathological fracture; B: after application of an external fixator; C: 3 months after surgery; D: 6 months post-treatment. MRI scan of the distal radius showing a Campanacci grade 3 GCT at the distal radius with a pathological fracture. He was managed with a dorsal open distal radius curettage and stabilization of the fracture with an external minifixator. An articulating external fixator was used to allow early range of motion (Fig. 3). The surgery was performed by a senior orthopedic surgeon in a tertiary care hospital. Histology confirmed the diagnosis of a GCT. He was referred to the oncologist and was started on denosumab 120 mg every 4 weekly for a total duration of 5 months as an adjuvant therapy. The dental status was checked and there was no evidence of osteonecrosis. There was a good response to treatment and the external fixator was removed after clinical and radiological confirmation of union at 5 months (Fig. 1). He was started on hand physiotherapy and occupational therapy. At 42 months post-treatment, he had satisfactory hand function with no evidence of recurrence (Fig. 4). His wrist flexion and extension was 60° while radial and ulna deviation were 15 and 20° respectively. He underwent an MRI at 1 year after completion of treatment followed by serial 6 monthly X-rays which did not reveal any recurrence. He is currently on regular surveillance to monitor for recurrence.
Fig. 3

External fixator applied to the distal forearm.

Fig. 4

X-rays at 42 months of follow up.

External fixator applied to the distal forearm. X-rays at 42 months of follow up.

Discussion

GCT of the distal radius is a benign bone tumor however, higher incidence of local invasion and recurrence rate has been reported. Preservation of structural and functional integrity while achieving adequate surgical resection is essential in the management. Therefore, in patients with GCT of the wrist, optimized balance between oncological cure and functional outcome should be achieved [6]. Extra cortical involvement and soft tissue expansion is thought to be common which complicates primary resection of the tumor. In high grade tumours, despite extensive curettage and bone cementing, local recurrence has been reported as high as 88 % [3]. En bloc resection may achieve better local control however, may compromise adequate reconstruction and long term function. Therefore, extensive resection may not be suitable as a standard method of treatment for GCT of the distal radius [6]. Furthermore, some form of reconstruction is necessary after resection of the primary tumor. There are several options available for reconstruction such as osteoarticular allograft, allograft arthrodesis and vascularized or non-vascularized fibular autograft with or without arthrodesis [7]. In cases of pathological factures, some form of fixation is necessary for stabilization. Successful treatment with open reduction and internal fixation has been described in few cases [8], [9]. However due to its rarity, there are no long term data on reconstruction techniques and outcomes of pathological fractures of the distal radius with GCT including sufficient number of patients. Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody was approved for the treatment of unresectable GCT or where surgical resection is likely to result in severe morbidity [10]. A systematic review by Jamshidi K et al., elaborated the use of denosumab a as neoadjuvant therapy in grade 2 and 3 lesions in order to improve resectability [2]. Recently studies have shown benefits of denosumab as neoadjuvant therapy for GCT in terms of pain reduction and tumor suppression. However, the use of denosumab in patients with GCT in the distal radius is controversial [6]. That is because recent studies have shown that, although it helps in tumor regression, it had no benefits of improving recurrence free survival [2], [6]. Cell culture studies have shown that denosumab was able to clear the giant cells, however, the effect on neoplastic stromal cells were minimal and were continuously proliferating [6]. However, our patient was recurrence free after 42 months of treatment completion. Overall experience of the patient was satisfactory with good functional outcomes. Our patient presented late with a pathological fracture of the distal radius with GCT. The extensive involvement of the distal radius and local invasion precluded the use of internal fixation after thorough curettage. Therefore, we used an external minifixator to stabilize the fracture and started on denosumab following oncology opinion. Although there are reports of successful use of internal fixation, the successful use of external fixator is not commonly described [8], [9]. Our case report suggests the possibility of the usage of external fixator and adjuvant denosumab for selected patients with GCT who are not suitable for internal fixation. The external fixator was removed after satisfactory union was achieved. At 42 months of follow-up, there was no evidence of recurrence and the functional outcome was satisfactory. However, the patient requires close long term surveillance to monitor for recurrence.

Conclusion

We described the use of adjuvant denosumab following curettage and external fixator for a late presentation of pathological fracture of the distal radius with GCT. The extensive involvement of the distal radius and local invasion precluded the use of internal fixation after thorough curettage. External fixation with adjuvant therapy may be considered an option in patients who require extensive curettage and who are not suitable for internal fixation. However, cohort studies with long term follow up is necessary before it can be recommended in routine practice.

Abbreviations

giant cell tumor magnetic resonance imaging

Sources of funding

None declared.

Ethical approval

Our institution does not require ethical clearance for case reports.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal on request.

Author contributions

Author AA, CP, AF, UJ and RS contributed to collection of information and writing of the manuscript. Authors UJ and RS contributed to the final approval of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version for publication.

Research registration

Not applicable.

Guarantor

Rukshan Sooriyarachchi.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
  10 in total

1.  The SCARE 2020 Guideline: Updating Consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) Guidelines.

Authors:  Riaz A Agha; Thomas Franchi; Catrin Sohrabi; Ginimol Mathew; Ahmed Kerwan
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 2.  Denosumab in Patients with Giant Cell Tumor and Its Recurrence: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Khodamorad Jamshidi; Mohamad Gharehdaghi; Sami Sam Hajialiloo; Masoud Mirkazemi; Kamran Ghaffarzadehgan; Azra Izanloo
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2018-07

3.  Giant cell tumor - distal end radius: Do we know the answer?

Authors:  Yogesh Panchwagh; Ajay Puri; Manish Agarwal; Chetan Anchan; Mandip Shah
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.251

4.  Management of the giant-cell tumours of the distal radius.

Authors:  M T Khan; J M Gray; S R Carter; R J Grimer; R M Tillman
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  [Surgical treatment for long bone giant cell tumor of extremity with pathologic fracture].

Authors:  Xiao Li; Wei Guo; Yi Yang; Ran Wei; Zhi-Ye DU
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2013-10-18

Review 6.  Giant cell tumour of bone: new treatments in development.

Authors:  A López-Pousa; J Martín Broto; T Garrido; J Vázquez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Giant Cell Tumor of Distal Radius After Open Reduction Internal Fixation for Distal Radius Fracture.

Authors:  Danielle C Marshall; Roger J Bartolotta; Roberto A Garcia; Meera Hameed; Dean G Lorich; Edward A Athanasian; Duretti T Fufa
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2017-10-17

Review 8.  Biology of RANK, RANKL, and osteoprotegerin.

Authors:  Brendan F Boyce; Lianping Xing
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.156

9.  Clinical outcome of en-block resection and reconstruction with nonvascularized fibular autograft for the treatment of giant cell tumor of distal radius.

Authors:  Mohammad H Taraz-Jamshidi; Mohammad Gharadaghi; Seyed Mahdi Mazloumi; Mohammad Hallaj-Moghaddam; Mohammad H Ebrahimzadeh
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.852

10.  Managements of giant cell tumor within the distal radius: A retrospective study of 58 cases from a single center.

Authors:  Changye Zou; Tiao Lin; Bo Wang; Zhiqiang Zhao; Bin Li; Xianbiao Xie; Gang Huang; Junqiang Yin; Jingnan Shen
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 4.072

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.