Literature DB >> 35785388

ECG characteristics of COVID-19 patient with arrhythmias: Referral hospitals data from Indonesia.

Yoga Yuniadi1, Dony Yugo1, Muhammad Fajri2, Budi Ario Tejo3, Diah Retno Widowati3, Dicky Armen Hanafy1, Sunu Budhi Raharjo1.   

Abstract

Background: Arrhythmia is a significant clinical modifier in COVID-19 patient outcomes. Currently, data on arrhythmia and ECG characteristics in COVID-19 from lower middle-income countries are limited.
Methods: COVID-19 was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction testing of a nasopharyngeal sample. All clinical records were systematically evaluated to obtain demographic characteristics and medical comorbidities. The ECG was recorded on admission, in-hospital, and at discharge.
Results: Total documented arrhythmia events account for 22% of patients, comprising 6% of new-onset arrhythmia and 16% of existing arrhythmia. Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia. The ECG changes were a decrease in heart rate (91 ± 22 vs. 83 ± 20, p < .001) and an increase in the QT interval (354.7 ± 53.70 vs. 371.4 ± 59.48 msec, p < .001) from hospital admission to hospital discharge, respectively. The in-hospital HR of 85 bpm or higher increases the risk of death (OR = 2.69, p = .019).
Conclusion: The incidence of arrhythmias in COVID-19 patients at COVID-19 referral hospitals in Indonesia is 22%. Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in COVID-19 patients. Prolongation of QRS duration from admission to discharge was related to the occurrence of new-onset arrhythmia. The in-hospital HR of 85 bpm or higher increased the risk of death.
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Covid‐19; ECG; arrhythmia; heart rate

Year:  2022        PMID: 35785388      PMCID: PMC9237289          DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arrhythm        ISSN: 1880-4276


INTRODUCTION

The Covid‐19 pandemic lasted for almost 2 years since the first case in December 2019 at Wuhan. Although the main symptoms of Covid‐19 are related to the respiratory system, heart involvement, especially arrhythmias, has been previously identified. Initial work by Wang et al. revealed that arrhythmia occurrence was about 17% among hospitalized Covid‐19 patients. Currently, only limited data on arrhythmia characteristics in Covid‐19 patients have been published, and most of them come from developed countries equipped with sophisticated medical facilities. This study aims to elaborate on arrhythmia and ECG characteristics of Covid‐19 patients hospitalized in a lower middle‐income country with fewer medical facilities and budgets.

METHODS

Study population

A total of 200 confirmed Covid‐19 patients by polymerase chain reaction testing of a nasopharyngeal sample participated in this study. A retrospective cohort was done in Covid‐19 referral hospitals of Pertamina Jaya Hospital, Fatmawati General Hospital, and National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita. The study received approval from the Institutional Review Board at National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita, Jakarta.

Clinical variables

All clinical records were systematically evaluated to obtain demographic characteristics and medical comorbidities. All the comorbidities were based on the final diagnosis recorded in medical records made by the physicians at discharge. The ECGs were recorded on admission and at discharge. If any arrhythmias occurred during hospitalization, additional ECG was recorded. Subjects with arrhythmia events were divided into new‐onset and preexisting arrhythmia groups. Patients with normal sinus rhythm during admission who had arrhythmia events during hospitalization were classified as new‐onset arrhythmia group. Meanwhile, patients who had arrhythmias during admission were classified into the preexisting arrhythmia group. The outcomes of this study were mechanical ventilation requirement, ICU admission, hospital length of stay, and mortality. In addition, the outcomes were analyzed in relation to the patient's grouping.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, version 25. We compared the clinical and ECG characteristics of patients with and without arrhythmias. The proportion of arrhythmias was calculated against the total number of patients who participated during the study period. The ECG characteristics and type of arrhythmia were analyzed using Pearson regression for correlation with clinical outcome. The categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi‐square test, while an independent sample t test/Mann–Whitney U test was used for continuous data. Nominal variables will be displayed as means and standard deviations. Various confounding variables will be tested by bivariate followed by multivariate. Statistical significance was considered significant if the p value was <.05.

RESULTS

Clinical characteristics

The majority of cases are male and relatively young. Hypertension and cerebrovascular disease (CVD) are the predominant comorbidities. Table 1 shows demographic and comorbid proportions. All patients took azithromycin 500 mg QD for the initial 5 days of hospitalization, but none took hydrochloroquine. Other medications were antiviral (favipiravir or remdesivir), additional intravenous antibiotic if needed, 1 g vitamin C injection, oral vitamin D 5000 IU, and oral Zinc sulfate. Actemra was rarely given due to undersupply and high cost .
TABLE 1

Clinical characteristics

ParametersDescription
Age52 ± 14
Gender
Male134 (67%)
Female66 (33%)
Comorbidities
Hypertension88 (44%)
CAD5 (2.5%)
DM68 (34%)
Chronic respiratory disease19 (9.5%)
CKD23 (11.5%)
CVD104 (52%)
Obesity5 (2.5%)
LOS (days)17 ± 11

Abbreviations: CAD, coronary artery disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CVD, cerebrovascular disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; LOS, length of stay.

Clinical characteristics Abbreviations: CAD, coronary artery disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CVD, cerebrovascular disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; LOS, length of stay.

Rhythm characteristics

Total documented arrhythmia events account for 22% of patients, comprising 6% of new‐onset arrhythmia and 16% of preexisting arrhythmia. Atrial fibrillation was the commonest arrhythmia encountered in our subjects, but there was no documented ventricular arrhythmia event. During the average hospital length of stay of 17.50 ± 11.02 days proportion of most arrhythmias decreases significantly from admission to discharge (Table 2). Total AV block occurred in 1 patient and persisted until 14 days, warrants permanent pacemaker implantation (Figure 1).
TABLE 2

The arrhythmia types and ECG parameters during admission and discharge

Rhythm and ECGRecording time p value
Admission (n = 200)Discharge (n = 200)
Rhythm types
Sinus rhythm171 (85.5%)176 (88%)<.001
Atrial fibrillation21 (10.5%)18 (9%)<.001
Atrial flutter2 (1%)1 (0.5%).01
Junctional rhythm1 (0.5%)1 (0.5%)1.00
Pacing rhythm1 (0.5%)2 (1%).01
AV block4 (2%)2 (1%).04
ECG parameters
Heart rate (bpm)91 ± 2283 ± 20<.001
QRS duration (ms)88.7 ± 18.590.3 ± 21.1.224
QT interval (ms)354.7 ± 53.7371.4 ± 59.5<.001
QTc interval (ms)431.4 ± 81.7430.9 ± 56.5.229
ST‐T changes (%)3536.695
FIGURE 1

Complete heart block happened at ninth days of hospitalization in one patient

The arrhythmia types and ECG parameters during admission and discharge Complete heart block happened at ninth days of hospitalization in one patient

ECG parameters

Three cardiology fellows manually calculated basic ECG parameters with intra‐ and interobserver agreement of 0.80 and 0.89, respectively. There was a total of 400 ECGs on admission and discharge. The mean heart rate was decreased, whereas the QT interval was slightly increased from admission to discharge (Table 2). The QRS duration, QT corrected (QTc) interval, and ST‐T changes were not statistically different. Subgroup analysis based on arrhythmia onset showed that in patients with normal sinus rhythm, heart rate was significantly decreased from admission to discharge. On the contrary, the QT interval was increased. Patients in the new‐onset arrhythmia group had a significant increase in QRS duration from admission to discharge. The preexisting arrhythmia group showed no significant differences in all measured ECG parameters (Table 3).
TABLE 3

The ECG parameters on normal rhythm and arrhythmia

VariableNormal rhythm p valueNew‐onset arrhythmia p valueExisting arrhythmia p value
AdmissionDischargeAdmissionDischargeAdmissionDischarge
Heart Rate (bpm)90 ± 19.783 ± 17.3<.00184 ± 14.0271 ± 28.09.080100 ± 31.988 ± 26.1.072
QRS Duration (msec)87.5 ± 18.188.1 ± 19.4.58386.3 ± 16.693.5 ± 23.6.04195 ± 20.299.7 ± 25.7.181
QT interval (msec)352.3 ± 46.8368.7 ± 56.9.001375.5 ± 42.8407.5 ± 70.7.155357.7 ± 81.9371.5 ± 64.9.372
QTc interval (msec)426.3 ± 53.8430.3 ± 52.3.324441.4 ± 50.4422.5 ± 65.9.318452.9 ± 163.6437 ± 72.2.608
ST‐T changes (%)32.735.3.37341.733.3.33943.840.6.662
The ECG parameters on normal rhythm and arrhythmia The in‐hospital and discharge/last recorded heart rate (HR) were significantly higher in patients who required ICU or died (Table 4). The in‐hospital and discharge/last ECG HR of >85 bpm had an increased risk of death (OR = 2.69, p = .019 and OR = 2.47, p = .035, respectively) (Table 5).
TABLE 4

The ECG parameters and clinical outcomes

Survive (n = 169)Death (n = 31) p Non‐ICU (132)ICU (n = 67) p
HR 190.2 ± 22.496.8 ± 19.6.12891.4 ± 22.691.2 ± 21.3.958
HR 279.9 ± 17.288.2 ± 16.3.02879.3 ± 17.084.9 ± 17.1.059
HR 380.4 ± 16.297.5 ± 30.3.00180.9 ± 17.086.9 ± 24.4.046
QRS Dur 188.9 ± 18.887.5 ± 16.7.70988.8 ± 19.288.5 ± 17.3.89
QRS Dur 290.1 ± 20.789.5 ± 18.89791.7 ± 2289 ± 16.1.175
QRS Dur 390.2 ± 21.490.1 ± 19.9.94391.2 ± 22.388.8 ± 18.6.446
QT 1356.8 ± 56.1343.582 ± 36.8.207359.3 ± 58.1345.6 ± 43.3.09
QT 2379.2 ± 57.3364.5 ± 41.6.217383.4 ± 59.2364.8 ± 44.1.051
QT 3373.8 ± 59.4358.3 ± 59.182378.8 ± 62.5357.7 ± 50.7.017
QTc 1432.8 ± 86.8423.9 ± 44.3.576437.1 ± 92.4420.7 ± 54.4.181
QTc 2433.0 ± 51.4432.0 ± 58.5.932436.7 ± 53.7425.6 ± 50.3.223
QTc 3429.5 ± 54.2439 ± 67.9.389434.8 ± 55.4423.4 ± 58.6.18

Note: 1 = admission, 2 = in‐hospital, 3 = discharge or last ECG.

Abbreviations: HR, heart rate; QRS Dur, QRS duration.

TABLE 5

Logistic regression test of heart rate for the outcomes

HR cutoffHR2HR3
Deathn (%)Surviven (%) p ORDeathn (%)Surviven (%) p OR
≥ 8516 (51.6)48 (28.4).0132.6919 (61.3)66 (39.1).0242.47
< 8515 (48.4)121 (71.6)12 (38.7)103 (60.9)
Total31 (100)169 (100)31 (100)169 (100)

Abbreviations: HR2, in‐hospital heart rate; HR3, discharge/last ECG heart rate; OR, odds ratio.

The ECG parameters and clinical outcomes Note: 1 = admission, 2 = in‐hospital, 3 = discharge or last ECG. Abbreviations: HR, heart rate; QRS Dur, QRS duration. Logistic regression test of heart rate for the outcomes Abbreviations: HR2, in‐hospital heart rate; HR3, discharge/last ECG heart rate; OR, odds ratio.

Arrhythmia outcomes

In patients with sinus rhythm, 20% required a ventilator, 34.8% required ICU care, and 14.7% died during an average of 18 ± 11 days length of stay. Neither existing nor new‐onset arrhythmias changed outcomes in terms of mechanical ventilation requirement, ICU stay, hospital length of stay, and mortality (Table 6).
TABLE 6

Association of arrhythmia types with clinical outcomes

Rhythm at admissionVentilator requirement p valueICU admission p valueDeath p value
Sinus rhythmRefRefRef
Atrial fibrillation4 (19%)1.006 (28.6%).854 (19%).53
Atrial flutter0 (0%)1.002 (100%).120 (0%)1.00
Junctional rhythm0 (0%)1.000 (0%)1.000 (0%)1.00
Pacing rhythm1 (100%).211 (100%).341 (100%).15
AV block1 (25%)1.001 (25%)1.001 (25%).48
Association of arrhythmia types with clinical outcomes Atrial fibrillation was not associated with the need for a ventilator, ICU hospitalization, and death. Other documented arrhythmias were not influenced the clinical outcomes as well (Supporting Information Table S1).

Inflammation markers

In 60 subjects, who had complete laboratory data, we analyzed the relationship of inflammatory markers to the changes in ECG parameters. The admission CRP level showed a significant and moderate correlation with an increase in QRS duration (r = .35, p = .03) and QTc intervals (r = .36, p = .03) at discharge (Table 7). The admission CRP level did not differ between normal rhythm and arrhythmia subjects (33.2 ± 41.4 vs. 28.9 ± 38.1, p = .759, respectively). In addition, the ESR is moderately correlated with discharge QT interval (r = .36, p = .03). However, there is no significant association between inflammation markers and AF in our subset.
TABLE 7

Pearson correlation between inflammatory markers and ECG parameters (n = 60)

Inflammatory markersQRS durationQT intervalQTc interval
AdmissionDischargeAdmissionDischargeAdmissionDischarge
r p value r p value r p value r p value r p value r p value
ESR.07.67.08.62−.13.41.34.03−.16.29.20.21
WBC.06.70−.14.36.06.72−.06.72.02.91−.54.73
CRP.22.19.35.03−.22.19.31.06−.11.52.36.03
Pearson correlation between inflammatory markers and ECG parameters (n = 60)

DISCUSSION

Our study found that the prevalence of arrhythmia events in Covid‐19 patients was 22% in total. The arrhythmias occurred in 18% of patients during admission and remained found in 15% of patients at discharge. Previous work reported the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias in COVID‐19 patients was about 17%. However, we found no difference in clinical outcome between patients who developed arrhythmias during hospitalization and patients who already had arrhythmias on admission compared with patients without arrhythmias. This happened because the Covid‐19 mortality in our series was high (15.5%), which was higher than in previous reports. Patients with existing arrhythmias tend to have a higher mortality rate. Wang et al. found more frequent ICU admission in arrhythmia patients than in patients with a normal rhythm. We found that atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia during Covid‐19 hospitalization among documented arrhythmia events. However, there is no correlation between atrial fibrillation and clinical outcomes of Covid‐19 patients in our series. As an emerging disease, data on clinical factors associated with Covid‐19 are evolving and conflicting. Bhatla et al. found a 25% incidence of atrial fibrillation, the most common arrhythmia in their cohort. Their data showed atrial fibrillation was associated with mortality but was not an independent factor in multivariate analysis. In recent publications from developed countries, Paris et al. and Mountantonakis et al. reported that AF was found in 15%–17.6% of Covid‐19 cases and significantly had higher hospital mortality compared with patients without atrial fibrillation. , In‐hospital death occurred in 38.7% of the patients with a history for AF vs. 20.8% of those without. The association between AF and mortality remained significant after adjustment for variables associated with COVID‐19 severity, such as comorbidities, previous anticoagulant use, oxygen saturation, red blood cells count, hemoglobin, CRP, plasma troponin, and HF history. Of note, the mean age of patients in this study was 67.4 ± 13.2 years old and even older in AF patients (75.8 ± 10.9 and 73.1 ± 13.5 years old, respectively). , They did not adjust to the age, even though age is a prominent risk factor of AF. Our patients were younger (51.9 ± 13.7 years old) with lower AF incidence (10.5%). Furthermore, in our study, arrhythmia documentation was based on the 12‐lead ECG of patients treated in a regular ward and witnessed ECG monitoring during ICU treatment. This method potentially underestimates actual AF events. However, it generally shows the importance of routine ECG screening to avoid undetectable AF events. Our study found significant ECG changes in Covid‐19 patients: a decrease in heart rate and an increase in the QT interval from hospital admission to hospital discharge. Fever and inflammation due to moderate to severe Covid‐19 infection may cause an increase in heart rate at admission, which gradually normalized at discharge. A recent publication by Thakore et al. found that the admission QTc interval in 828 Covid‐19 patients was prolonged compared with discharged patients (450.1 ± 30.2 ms vs. 423.4 ± 21.7 ms, p < .0001). Our study found that the QTc interval did not differ from admission to discharge. On the contrary, the discharge QT interval in our study was longer than its admission value. As the QTc was calculated using Bazett's formula, it depends mainly on changes in RR intervals or HR, affecting the QTc values. In addition, smaller sample size in our study might also influence the results. Furthermore, the QT interval is influenced by several factors. A population‐based survey, which was conducted on 11,209 participants over the age of 35 in China, found that older age, abdominal obesity, hypertension, diabetes, hypokalemia, and any medicine used in the past 2 weeks were associated independently with increased risk for prolonged QTc interval (all p < .05 in the fully adjusted logistic regression model). The younger subjects in our study population might cause a different pattern of QTc interval change. Our study showed that in‐hospital HR of >85 bpm significantly increased the risk of death (OR = 2.47, p = .035). Patients with high HR throughout hospitalization might be associated with prolonged and severe inflammation. In the ICU setting, high HR has been associated with increased mortality. In the general population, a meta‐analysis revealed that higher resting HR was independently associated with increased risks of all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality in the general population. This indicates that resting HR is a predictor of all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality. In this study, an increase in the inflammatory marker CRP was significantly associated with lengthening of QRS duration and QTc intervals. Electrocardiographic changes are related to myocardial injury and higher inflammatory biomarkers in Covid‐19. Inflammation has also been recognized as a pivotal factor in QT interval prolongation. Several studies showed that persistent high‐grade systemic inflammation of rheumatoid arthritis was associated with QTc prolongation , , , , , and increased arrhythmias incidence. , A meta‐analysis of population‐based studies showed the risk of AF in rheumatoid arthritis patients was significantly increased. Earlier reports of QT interval prolongation in Covid‐19 patients were associated with drugs that prolong QT intervals, such as hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine and azithromycin. , , This should encourage clinicians to always pay attention to the side effects of medications that can prolong QT intervals and not underestimate the inflammatory influence on changes in QT intervals and arrhythmia events.

Limitation

This study has some limitations, such as different hospital discharge times resulting in different discharge ECG recording times. The changes in ECG parameters associated with inflammation might differ regarding recovery time. In addition, we only checked limited ECG parameters. Further studies in this younger age group by adding other ECG parameters such as QTd and QRS diminution may describe changes in the ECG pattern more completely.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of arrhythmias in Covid‐19 patients at Covid‐19 referral hospitals in Indonesia is 22%, consisting of 16% at admission and 15% at discharge. Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in Covid‐19 patients. Prolongation of QRS duration from admission to discharge was related to the occurrence of new‐onset arrhythmia. The in‐hospital HR of 85 bpm or higher increases the risk of death.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declared that they have NO affiliation with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or nonfinancial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. Table S1 Click here for additional data file.
  22 in total

1.  Increased risk of arrhythmia in patients with psoriatic disease: A nationwide population-based matched cohort study.

Authors:  Hsien-Yi Chiu; Wei-Lun Chang; Weng-Foung Huang; Yu-Wen Wen; Yi-Wen Tsai; Tsen-Fang Tsai
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  Antiarrhythmic potential of anticytokine therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: tocilizumab reduces corrected QT interval by controlling systemic inflammation.

Authors:  Pietro Enea Lazzerini; Maurizio Acampa; Pier Leopoldo Capecchi; Irene Fineschi; Enrico Selvi; Valentina Moscadelli; Stefania Zimbone; Daniela Gentile; Mauro Galeazzi; Franco Laghi-Pasini
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Dawei Wang; Bo Hu; Chang Hu; Fangfang Zhu; Xing Liu; Jing Zhang; Binbin Wang; Hui Xiang; Zhenshun Cheng; Yong Xiong; Yan Zhao; Yirong Li; Xinghuan Wang; Zhiyong Peng
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Association between corrected QT interval and inflammatory cytokines in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Ahmed M Adlan; Vasileios F Panoulas; Jacqueline P Smith; James P Fisher; George D Kitas
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  Prolonged QTc interval predicts all-cause mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an association driven by high inflammatory burden.

Authors:  Vasileios F Panoulas; Tracey E Toms; Karen M J Douglas; Aamer Sandoo; George S Metsios; Antonios Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou; George D Kitas
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 7.580

6.  Association between high sensitivity C-reactive protein, heart rate variability and corrected QT interval in patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis.

Authors:  Pietro Enea Lazzerini; Maurizio Acampa; Pier Leopoldo Capecchi; Mohamed Hammoud; Silvia Maffei; Stefania Bisogno; Cristiana Barreca; Mauro Galeazzi; Franco Laghi-Pasini
Journal:  Eur J Intern Med       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 4.487

7.  Increased heart rate on first day in Intensive Care Unit is associated with increased mortality.

Authors:  Duygu Kara; Seda Banu Akinci; Gulcin Babaoglu; Ulku Aypar
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

8.  QT interval prolongation and torsade de pointes in patients with COVID-19 treated with hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin.

Authors:  Ehud Chorin; Lalit Wadhwani; Silvia Magnani; Matthew Dai; Eric Shulman; Charles Nadeau-Routhier; Robert Knotts; Roi Bar-Cohen; Edward Kogan; Chirag Barbhaiya; Anthony Aizer; Douglas Holmes; Scott Bernstein; Michael Spinelli; David S Park; Carugo Stefano; Larry A Chinitz; Lior Jankelson
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 6.343

9.  QT interval and arrhythmic safety of hydroxychloroquine monotherapy in coronavirus disease 2019.

Authors:  Arun R Sridhar; Neal A Chatterjee; Basil Saour; Dan Nguyen; Elizabeth A Starnes; Christine Johnston; Margaret L Green; Gregory A Roth; Jeanne E Poole
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2020-06-11

10.  Prevalence and risk factors of prolonged corrected QT interval in general Chinese population.

Authors:  Qun Ma; Zhao Li; Xiaofan Guo; Liang Guo; Shasha Yu; Hongmei Yang; Lu Zou; Liqiang Zheng; Guowei Pan; Yonghong Zhang; Yingxian Sun
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.